Tuesday, April 23, 2024
More
    Home Blog Page 1960

    Grassroot Perspective – March 11, 2003-Hit Them Where They Ain't; School Choice Works – The Case of Sweden

    0

    “Dick Rowland Image”

    ”Shoots (News, Views and Quotes)”

    – Hit Them Where They Ain’t

    Reports that Al Qaeda wants to hijack planes and crash them into ships and subs at Pearl Harbor is — once the shock of the sheer audacity wears off — actually very good news. If accurate, the reports would indicate that Al Qaeda responds predictably to changes in conditions. And predictability is the first step to being caught.

    One of the key intelligence failures leading up to 9/11 was missing the role domestic flights could play in acts of terror. Security around domestic flights and at airports in the U.S. was, on balance, much less stringent than that found elsewhere in the world. Anyone looking to hijack planes would eventually come to the conclusion that the best odds were with domestic U.S. flights.

    Now that security around U.S. flights and airports has been ramped up, including all manner of bogus approaches that do little to actually improve security, those looking to hijack flights have to reassess. Domestic flights are no longer the low-hanging fruit. Today it is likely that overseas flights originating in the bustling airports of Asia provide the best opportunity for hijacking. Add in the fact that Al Qaeda operatives appear adept at moving in and out of places like the Philippines, and using Asian flights for terror becomes even more likely.

    So if your best bet at gaining control of a plane lies somewhere in
    Asia, what can you do with it? You want a uniquely U.S. target,
    preferably on U.S. soil. That points you to Hawaii and once Hawaii
    becomes a goal, Pearl Harbor is the obvious target.

    This kind of target selection process shows that terrorists are
    opportunists. Instead of fixating on single target or means of attack, they adapt and try to give themselves the best chance at success. Counter-terrorist planners in Washington need to recognize this and realize that there is limited utility to making any single means of attack impossible. That is Maginot Line thinking and just as easy to route around.

    A better approach would be to make the most vulnerable avenues of attack incrementally harder to breach. With luck, the changes would trip up terrorist cells before they have a chance to move and cause them to make mistakes that will expose them.

    https://www.washtimes.com/national/20030303-104.htm

    https://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/1491/

    Above is quoted from Reason Express reasonexpress@reason.com 3/4/03

    – School Choice Works – The Case of Sweden

    Historically Socialist Sweden Advances Milton Friedman’s Voucher Vision Leaving behind centralized control of schools, for-profit independent schools flourish

    Jan. 6, 2003, Indianapolis, IN–The Indianapolis-based Milton and
    Rose D. Friedman Foundation, a leading national group that advocates
    school choice, has released a study of Sweden’s ten-year-old school
    financing reforms, finding that they have dramatically advanced parental freedom and improved education in Sweden. Sweden’s government is predominantly based on socialist structures, with high taxation and publicly financed medical care and retirement.

    School Choice Works: The Case of Sweden, written by prominent Swedish public policy researchers Fredrik Bergstrom and Mikael Sandstrom, reveals that independent school funding reform passed in 1992 has resulted in the number of independent schools available to parents quintupling, and enrollment in independent schools quadrupling.

    Meanwhile, government schools have not suffered, but have improved. Swedish law since 1992 mandates that the government separate the financing of schools from the administration of schools, as Nobel laureate economist Milton Friedman proposed in 1955. Sweden’s independent schools are now financed on par with municipal schools, so long as they are approved. Since the reform, Sweden has shown the following advances:

    *Competition created by this new supply of schools has increased performance in Sweden’s municipal (government-run) schools.

    *Most independent schools in Sweden are run by for-profit educational companies, with no detrimental effects.

    *There is absolutely no evidence that the new “voucher system” has created a scenario where the rich are supplemented in their private choices. In fact, poorer Swedes choose independent schools at higher rates than do wealthy families.

    *Teachers’ unions in Sweden support the reform measures and indicate that they prefer to work in independent schools, where working conditions are better.

    In Sweden now, as in many northern European countries, parents are given a large range of educational options, public and private, parochial and secular. The researchers concluded that: “The main lesson to be learned from the Swedish reforms is that school choice works.{T}he Swedish example can indicate what would happen if a country, for example the USA, introduced more freedom of choice for students and parents and thus more competition between schools.”

    The Milton and Rose D. Friedman Foundation is a non-profit organization promoting public understanding of the need for major reform in K-12 education and of the role that competition through educational choice can play in achieving that reform.

    Above article is quoted from The newsletter of the Milton & Rose D.
    Friedman Foundation The School Choice January 2003
    www.friedmanfoundation.org

    ”Roots (Food for Thought)”

    A story posted on WorldNetDaily.com on Tuesday of this week says the leadership of the National Education Association, the national affiliate of the Florida Education Association, the state’s teachers union, “is so far removed from ordinary classroom environments they can no longer relate to the tasks facing working-class teachers.”

    The story quotes Carl Gibson, a spokesman for the Olympia-based
    Evergreen Freedom Foundation, who said, “The new leaders of the National Education Association tout themselves as classroom teachers on leave to represent their colleagues.”

    Gibson went on to say, “We did a little digging around to see what kind of classroom experience they have. Turns out none of them have worked in a classroom during the last decade. For some, it’s been far longer.”

    This got me wondering about the leadership of Florida’s teachers union. FEA’s current president, Maureen Dinnen, hasn’t been in a K-12 classroom since the 1970s. She taught at Broward Community College for some time after that, but according to that school’s
    personnel records office, she has not taught there since 1997. Her
    predecessor at the helm in the union is Pat Tornillo, who served as FEA president from the late 1970s to 2000, and is currently the local teacher union president in Miami-Dade County. He has been out of the classroom for more than 25 years. The union’s vice president for
    financial affairs, Bob Lee, has also been out of the classroom for more than 25 years and the first vice president, Andy Ford, who is in line to become the next FEA president, has not taught in about a decade.

    The WorldNetDaily report also looked at compensation of NEA’s top
    executives. The NEA’s incoming president, Reg Weaver, is being paid more than $231,000 and his pay will rise to more than $237,900 next year, according to the story. Additionally, it states, “Each of the
    three executive officers gets an additional 20 percent of salary as a
    cash ‘living allowance,’ plus another 20 percent of salary for
    benefits.” That should total another $92,000.

    In Florida, FEA president Dinnen was paid 112,014, plus an additional $60,309 in expenses and benefits according to the union’s 1998 report to the IRS. The following year, her salary jumped remarkably to $158,548-a pay increase of $46,534-more than
    40 percent.

    Consider that a $46,500 single-year pay increase is about $10,000 more than the average annual pay for a teacher in Florida. The union has since refused requests for salary information covering years 2000 and 2001. During that time, the two state unions merged and one must wonder-if this merger effectively doubled the size of the now-combined union, did Dinnen’s salary jump again?

    The state president is a higher level position than a local union
    president. It would seem odd if the state president were not paid more than the highest paid local union president.

    According to documents on file with the Public Employees Relations
    Commission, the agency to which unions are required to file financial disclosures, Tornillo is the highest paid local union president. The financial disclosure forms report that Tornillo was paid more than $225,429 in salary last year, with an additional $17,700 in expenses. If the state president were paid more than any local president, that could place this salary and benefits in excess of $243,000.

    This all strikes me as hypocritical. These same union bureaucrats moan about the low pay of teachers. But at the same time, they create these outrageous financial perks for themselves at the expense of the same teachers for whom they claim to be advocates. How can these union leaders sleep at night, knowing they force union teachers to pay as much as $830 a year in dues so that they, the union bureaucrats, can grant themselves financial perks that add up to as much as eight times more than the average annual salary of the teachers from whom they are taking?

    No wonder union membership has been plummeting. In some counties in Florida, only 3 percent of the teachers are now union members. Perhaps they were once blind but now they see.

    Gary Landry is a policy analyst at The James Madison Institute and may be contacted via email at glandry@jamesmadison.org

    Above article is quoted from The James Madison Institute, Point of View Aug. 23, 2002. See www.jamesmadison.org.

    ”Evergreen (Today’s Quote)”

    “The danger of minding people’s business is twofold. First, there is the danger that a man may leave his business unattended to; and, second, there is the danger of an impertinent interference with another’s affairs. The “friend of humanity” almost always run into both dangers.” — William Graham Sumner

    ”’Edited by Richard O. Rowland, president of Grassroot Institute of Hawaii. He can be reached at (808) 487-4959 or by email at:”’ mailto:grassroot@hawaii.rr.com ”’For more information, see its Web site at:”’ https://www.grassrootinstitute.org/

    Grassroot Perspective – March 11, 2003-Hit Them Where They Ain’t; School Choice Works – The Case of Sweden

    0

    “Dick Rowland Image”

    ”Shoots (News, Views and Quotes)”

    – Hit Them Where They Ain’t

    Reports that Al Qaeda wants to hijack planes and crash them into ships and subs at Pearl Harbor is — once the shock of the sheer audacity wears off — actually very good news. If accurate, the reports would indicate that Al Qaeda responds predictably to changes in conditions. And predictability is the first step to being caught.

    One of the key intelligence failures leading up to 9/11 was missing the role domestic flights could play in acts of terror. Security around domestic flights and at airports in the U.S. was, on balance, much less stringent than that found elsewhere in the world. Anyone looking to hijack planes would eventually come to the conclusion that the best odds were with domestic U.S. flights.

    Now that security around U.S. flights and airports has been ramped up, including all manner of bogus approaches that do little to actually improve security, those looking to hijack flights have to reassess. Domestic flights are no longer the low-hanging fruit. Today it is likely that overseas flights originating in the bustling airports of Asia provide the best opportunity for hijacking. Add in the fact that Al Qaeda operatives appear adept at moving in and out of places like the Philippines, and using Asian flights for terror becomes even more likely.

    So if your best bet at gaining control of a plane lies somewhere in
    Asia, what can you do with it? You want a uniquely U.S. target,
    preferably on U.S. soil. That points you to Hawaii and once Hawaii
    becomes a goal, Pearl Harbor is the obvious target.

    This kind of target selection process shows that terrorists are
    opportunists. Instead of fixating on single target or means of attack, they adapt and try to give themselves the best chance at success. Counter-terrorist planners in Washington need to recognize this and realize that there is limited utility to making any single means of attack impossible. That is Maginot Line thinking and just as easy to route around.

    A better approach would be to make the most vulnerable avenues of attack incrementally harder to breach. With luck, the changes would trip up terrorist cells before they have a chance to move and cause them to make mistakes that will expose them.

    https://www.washtimes.com/national/20030303-104.htm

    https://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/1491/

    Above is quoted from Reason Express reasonexpress@reason.com 3/4/03

    – School Choice Works – The Case of Sweden

    Historically Socialist Sweden Advances Milton Friedman’s Voucher Vision Leaving behind centralized control of schools, for-profit independent schools flourish

    Jan. 6, 2003, Indianapolis, IN–The Indianapolis-based Milton and
    Rose D. Friedman Foundation, a leading national group that advocates
    school choice, has released a study of Sweden’s ten-year-old school
    financing reforms, finding that they have dramatically advanced parental freedom and improved education in Sweden. Sweden’s government is predominantly based on socialist structures, with high taxation and publicly financed medical care and retirement.

    School Choice Works: The Case of Sweden, written by prominent Swedish public policy researchers Fredrik Bergstrom and Mikael Sandstrom, reveals that independent school funding reform passed in 1992 has resulted in the number of independent schools available to parents quintupling, and enrollment in independent schools quadrupling.

    Meanwhile, government schools have not suffered, but have improved. Swedish law since 1992 mandates that the government separate the financing of schools from the administration of schools, as Nobel laureate economist Milton Friedman proposed in 1955. Sweden’s independent schools are now financed on par with municipal schools, so long as they are approved. Since the reform, Sweden has shown the following advances:

    *Competition created by this new supply of schools has increased performance in Sweden’s municipal (government-run) schools.

    *Most independent schools in Sweden are run by for-profit educational companies, with no detrimental effects.

    *There is absolutely no evidence that the new “voucher system” has created a scenario where the rich are supplemented in their private choices. In fact, poorer Swedes choose independent schools at higher rates than do wealthy families.

    *Teachers’ unions in Sweden support the reform measures and indicate that they prefer to work in independent schools, where working conditions are better.

    In Sweden now, as in many northern European countries, parents are given a large range of educational options, public and private, parochial and secular. The researchers concluded that: “The main lesson to be learned from the Swedish reforms is that school choice works.{T}he Swedish example can indicate what would happen if a country, for example the USA, introduced more freedom of choice for students and parents and thus more competition between schools.”

    The Milton and Rose D. Friedman Foundation is a non-profit organization promoting public understanding of the need for major reform in K-12 education and of the role that competition through educational choice can play in achieving that reform.

    Above article is quoted from The newsletter of the Milton & Rose D.
    Friedman Foundation The School Choice January 2003
    www.friedmanfoundation.org

    ”Roots (Food for Thought)”

    A story posted on WorldNetDaily.com on Tuesday of this week says the leadership of the National Education Association, the national affiliate of the Florida Education Association, the state’s teachers union, “is so far removed from ordinary classroom environments they can no longer relate to the tasks facing working-class teachers.”

    The story quotes Carl Gibson, a spokesman for the Olympia-based
    Evergreen Freedom Foundation, who said, “The new leaders of the National Education Association tout themselves as classroom teachers on leave to represent their colleagues.”

    Gibson went on to say, “We did a little digging around to see what kind of classroom experience they have. Turns out none of them have worked in a classroom during the last decade. For some, it’s been far longer.”

    This got me wondering about the leadership of Florida’s teachers union. FEA’s current president, Maureen Dinnen, hasn’t been in a K-12 classroom since the 1970s. She taught at Broward Community College for some time after that, but according to that school’s
    personnel records office, she has not taught there since 1997. Her
    predecessor at the helm in the union is Pat Tornillo, who served as FEA president from the late 1970s to 2000, and is currently the local teacher union president in Miami-Dade County. He has been out of the classroom for more than 25 years. The union’s vice president for
    financial affairs, Bob Lee, has also been out of the classroom for more than 25 years and the first vice president, Andy Ford, who is in line to become the next FEA president, has not taught in about a decade.

    The WorldNetDaily report also looked at compensation of NEA’s top
    executives. The NEA’s incoming president, Reg Weaver, is being paid more than $231,000 and his pay will rise to more than $237,900 next year, according to the story. Additionally, it states, “Each of the
    three executive officers gets an additional 20 percent of salary as a
    cash ‘living allowance,’ plus another 20 percent of salary for
    benefits.” That should total another $92,000.

    In Florida, FEA president Dinnen was paid 112,014, plus an additional $60,309 in expenses and benefits according to the union’s 1998 report to the IRS. The following year, her salary jumped remarkably to $158,548-a pay increase of $46,534-more than
    40 percent.

    Consider that a $46,500 single-year pay increase is about $10,000 more than the average annual pay for a teacher in Florida. The union has since refused requests for salary information covering years 2000 and 2001. During that time, the two state unions merged and one must wonder-if this merger effectively doubled the size of the now-combined union, did Dinnen’s salary jump again?

    The state president is a higher level position than a local union
    president. It would seem odd if the state president were not paid more than the highest paid local union president.

    According to documents on file with the Public Employees Relations
    Commission, the agency to which unions are required to file financial disclosures, Tornillo is the highest paid local union president. The financial disclosure forms report that Tornillo was paid more than $225,429 in salary last year, with an additional $17,700 in expenses. If the state president were paid more than any local president, that could place this salary and benefits in excess of $243,000.

    This all strikes me as hypocritical. These same union bureaucrats moan about the low pay of teachers. But at the same time, they create these outrageous financial perks for themselves at the expense of the same teachers for whom they claim to be advocates. How can these union leaders sleep at night, knowing they force union teachers to pay as much as $830 a year in dues so that they, the union bureaucrats, can grant themselves financial perks that add up to as much as eight times more than the average annual salary of the teachers from whom they are taking?

    No wonder union membership has been plummeting. In some counties in Florida, only 3 percent of the teachers are now union members. Perhaps they were once blind but now they see.

    Gary Landry is a policy analyst at The James Madison Institute and may be contacted via email at glandry@jamesmadison.org

    Above article is quoted from The James Madison Institute, Point of View Aug. 23, 2002. See www.jamesmadison.org.

    ”Evergreen (Today’s Quote)”

    “The danger of minding people’s business is twofold. First, there is the danger that a man may leave his business unattended to; and, second, there is the danger of an impertinent interference with another’s affairs. The “friend of humanity” almost always run into both dangers.” — William Graham Sumner

    ”’Edited by Richard O. Rowland, president of Grassroot Institute of Hawaii. He can be reached at (808) 487-4959 or by email at:”’ mailto:grassroot@hawaii.rr.com ”’For more information, see its Web site at:”’ https://www.grassrootinstitute.org/

    Biotech Money Faces Rough Ride

    0

    SINGAPORE, March 8 (UPI) — As a sign of the concern over biotechnology investments, about $3 billion of worldwide mutual fund investments left the biotech sector last year in favor of other investments.

    The industry is expected to face further investor skepticism this year, which may lead to a financing crunch. Manish Jain, a pharmaceutical and biotechnology analyst for Merrill Lynch, estimated that in January alone $250 million exited from the sector.

    Biotechnology is based on biology, bringing together many sciences and engineering discipline. Its application range from healthcare (therapeutic drugs and vaccine, regenerative medicine) to agriculture (crop plants production and protection).

    This industry has been expanding rapidly growing from a market capitalization of about $45 billion in 1994 to over $200 billion last year. The industry is forecast to be worth $1 trillion by 2020.

    But at the same time, volatility in international stock markets, as well as failures of new ‘phase 3’ products (when a full fledge trial on the product is conducted), have put pressures on the sector in the last two years.

    In 2001, $500 million of U.S. mutual fund investment flew out of the industry and the trend depended in 2002. “2002 was a very difficult year for the industry. This is clearly evident by the lack of companies that could go public,” notes Ben Iversen, director of equity capital markets at Merrill Lynch.

    Alan Mendelson, an adviser at Latham & Watkins, believes this year will prove another difficult one.

    “2003 is unlikely to be a boom time for U.S. firms, but 2004 could be more appealing,” he told a small group of reporters at a presentation in Singapore.

    The legal firm of Latham & Watkins has been counsel in some of the most significant transactions in the biotechnology industry, including representing Amgen in its $16.9 billion acquisition of Immunex Corporation, the largest biotechnology merger ever.

    Merrill estimated that about 60 percent of U.S. companies in the sector had less than two years of cash available in their coffers then their burnt rate is taken into consideration. This means some companies will have to seek financing. It can take up to $500 million to develop a product.

    “There is a number of companies posed to go public that are in the ‘phase 2-3; with their products,” Iversen noted. Jain was also “cautiously optimistic” for this year, given that several ‘phase 3’ products are expected to come out.

    Mendelson said some venture-capital funds were still willing to spend huge sums in the sector. He pointed to New Enterprise Associate, which has $600 million dedicated to life science.

    Iversen argued that the financial markets are cyclical for life sciences meant companies that were considering raising funds needed to be well prepared for the upturn. “Typically rallies are measured in terms of months, and drought is terms of years. There are always a few months of frantic activity in financing, but it never last,” he said.

    “Many companies are chasing the same (financing) dream, but there is the law of supply and demand,” added Mendelson.

    In a recent report, research firm IDC estimated that $50 billion will be injected into the Asia/Pacific life science markets alone from both public and private sources over the next few years.

    South Korea is aiming to join the world’s top seven biotechnology powers by 2010; Taiwan is earmarking 3 percent of gross domestic product for life science development; and Singapore wants 20,000 scientists based there by 2005.

    Meanwhile, China is also making a concerted effort to raise the standard and profile of its local biotechnology industry.

    Iversen also pointed to India, as a country seeing a lot of activity in that sector.

    Copyright 2003 by United Press International. All rights reserved.

    From Paying Attention to Letting Go of Resentment

    0

    “Suzanne Gelb Image”

    ”Daydreaming – How Can I be More Focused?”

    Dear Dr. Gelb:

    I am a conscientious student, but sometimes when I sit in the lecture, although I try to concentrate on what the teacher says, my mind wanders and before I know it, the lecture is over and can’t remember much that was said. How can I stay on track?

    Off Track

    A: Dr. Gelb says . . .

    Dear Off Track:

    It is important to reserve fantasies and day dreaming for appropriate times during the day. I love daydreams and fantasies. Without them, life could be somewhat boring. However, I have learned to prioritize my thoughts and apply self-discipline to become involved in what is important for the moment, such as computer work and chores that need to be done. Good luck with your change.

    ”Helping Each Other – Is That a Thing of the Past?”

    Dear Dr. Gelb:

    Someone I used to look up to promised me a favor and let me down, but I try to follow the principles of my church, which says to forgive and forget. The other day I saw this person at a meeting and I still felt resentful toward them. How can I forgive and forget?

    Resentful

    A: Dr. Gelb says . . .

    Dear Resentful:

    Sometimes people develop what I call “claims” about other people’s behavior. This can be understood as having expectations about how others should behave — such as the expectation that “other people ought to bail us out when the going gets tough.” Probably most of us have been taught that when someone makes a promise, they should keep it. There is nothing wrong with this value system, but it can be problematic if we expect people to behave a certain way, because free choice is a factor.

    As for being let down, it is important to grieve the loss and then move on. This can include striving toward becoming independent and developing resources so that if one person doesn’t come through, there is a back up. The concept of helping each other, especially nowadays, is hard to come by. I like the idea of striving for independence and self-reliance, and when others do come through for me, I consider it frosting on the cake.

    ”’Suzanne J. Gelb, Ph.D., J.D. authors this daily column, Dr. Gelb Says, which answers questions about daily living and behavior issues. Dr. Gelb is a licensed psychologist in private practice in Honolulu. She holds a Ph.D. in Psychology and a Ph.D. in Human Services. Dr. Gelb is also a published author of a book on Overcoming Addictions and a book on Relationships.”’

    ”’This column is intended for entertainment use only and is not intended for the purpose of psychological diagnosis, treatment or personalized advice. For more about the column’s purpose, see”’ “An Online Intro to Dr. Gelb Says”

    ”’Email your questions to mailto:DrGelbSays@hawaiireporter.com More information on Dr. Gelb’s services and related resources available at”’ https://www.DrGelbSays.com

    Legislative Hearing Notices – March 11, 2003

    0

    The following hearing notices, which are subject to change, were sorted and taken from the Hawaii State Capitol Web site. Please check that site for updates and/or changes to the schedule at

    “Hawaii State Legislature Sidebar”

    Go there and click on the Hearing Date to view the Hearing Notice.

    Hearings notices for both House and Senate measures in all committees:

    Hearing

    ”Date Time Bill Number Measure Title Committee”

    3/11/03 8:30 AM SB773 RELATING TO UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE. LAB

    3/11/03 8:30 AM SB1070 RELATING TO EXAMINATIONS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF PERMANENT IMPAIRMENT. LAB

    3/11/03 8:30 AM SB1309 SD2 RELATING TO THE EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM. LAB

    3/11/03 8:30 AM SB1312 SD1 RELATING TO THE EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM. LAB

    3/11/03 8:30 AM SB1373 SD1 RELATING TO STAFFING FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED PROGRAMS. LAB

    ”Date Time Bill Number Measure Title Committee”

    3/11/03 9:00 AM HB851 HD1 RELATING TO TAXATION APPEALS. JHW

    3/11/03 9:00 AM HB997 HD1 RELATING TO LEGISLATIVE INFORMATION. JHW

    3/11/03 9:00 AM HB1003 HD1 RELATING TO CRIME VICTIM COMPENSATION. JHW

    3/11/03 9:00 AM HB1111 HD2 MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR CLAIMS AGAINST THE STATE, ITS OFFICERS, OR ITS EMPLOYEES. JHW

    3/11/03 9:00 AM HB1154 HD1 RELATING TO UNCLAIMED PROPERTY. JHW

    3/11/03 9:00 AM HCR36 ACKNOWLEDGING THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF HULA AND RECOGNIZING APRIL 1, 2003, TO MARCH 31, 2004, AS THE “YEAR OF THE HULA.” TAC

    3/11/03 9:00 AM HR24 ACKNOWLEDGING THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF HULA AND RECOGNIZING APRIL 1, 2003, TO MARCH 31, 2004, AS THE “YEAR OF THE HULA.” TAC

    3/11/03 9:00 AM SB1460 SD1 RELATING TO CONTRACTS ENTERED INTO BY THE HAWAII TOURISM AUTHORITY. TAC

    3/11/03 9:00 AM SB1462 RELATING TO THE HAWAII TOURISM AUTHORITY. TAC

    ”Date Time Bill Number Measure Title Committee”

    3/11/03 9:30 AM SB739 RELATING TO ANATOMICAL GIFTS. HLT

    3/11/03 9:30 AM SB740 RELATING TO HEALTH. HLT

    3/11/03 9:30 AM SB792 SD2 RELATING TO ADVANCED PRACTICE REGISTERED NURSES. HLT

    3/11/03 9:30 AM SB1469 SD1 RELATING TO PEER SUPPORT COUNSELING SESSIONS. HLT

    3/11/03 9:30 AM SB1061 SD1 RELATING TO ADULT RESIDENTIAL CARE HOMES. HLT/HSH

    3/11/03 9:30 AM SB956 SD2 RELATING TO PRESUMPTIVE MEDICAID ELIGIBILITY FOR PREGNANT WOMEN. HSH/HLT

    ”Date Time Bill Number Measure Title Committee”

    3/11/03 10:30 AM None Informational Briefing EEP-ENE

    ”Date Time Bill Number Measure Title Committee”

    3/11/03 2:45 PM HB189 HD2 RELATING TO EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTIVES FOR SEX ASSAULT SURVIVORS IN EMERGENCY ROOMS. HTH

    3/11/03 2:45 PM HB436 MAKING AN APPROPRIATION TO FUND A SECOND AMBULANCE TO SERVE THE WAIANAE COAST. HTH

    3/11/03 2:45 PM HB548 HD2 RELATING TO ANATOMICAL GIFTS. HTH

    3/11/03 2:45 PM HB645 RELATING TO SPECIAL PURPOSE REVENUE BONDS FOR ASSISTING NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS THAT PROVIDE HEALTH CARE FACILITIES TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC. HTH

    3/11/03 2:45 PM HB651 HD2 RELATING TO INFORMED CONSENT. HTH

    3/11/03 2:45 PM HB735 HD1 MAKING AN APPROPRIATION FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES. HTH

    3/11/03 2:45 PM HB1181 HD1 MAKING AN EMERGENCY APPROPRIATION FOR THE HAWAII HEALTH SYSTEMS CORPORATION. HTH

    3/11/03 2:45 PM HB1182 HD2 RELATING TO EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES. HTH

    3/11/03 2:45 PM HB1498 HD1 MAKING AN APPROPRIATION FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL AIR TRANSPORT SERVICES FOR THE COUNTY OF MAUI. HTH

    3/11/03 2:45 PM None Informational Briefing SAT

    ”’To reach legislators, see:”’ “Representatives at a Glance” and “Senators at a Glance”

    New Alliance Targets Hawaii Fugitives, Repeat Offenders

    The United States Marshals Service and the state of Hawaii Department of Public Safety have formed a Hawaii Fugitive Task Force, with the primary mission to seek out and arrest, in a joint and coordinated manner, persons who have outstanding state or federal warrants for their arrest. The intent of this joint effort will be to increase public safety through the location and apprehension of state and federal fugitives.

    Although all types of fugitives will be sought out for capture, the Task Force will primarily target fugitives having a criminal history, including, violent crimes, weapon offenses and drug offenses.

    I have always said that it is totally unacceptable to see people who have had 14 prior convictions along with 50 or 60 prior arrests still roaming our streets.

    We need to remove these individuals from the streets, so that our community, our homes and our families are safe. Therefore, the formation of this Task Force is designed toward protecting our communities from these offenders who have no problem ignoring Court-Orders.

    Our message to these fugitives is simple. If you think there are no consequences for running from the law or disobeying a court order — you are fooling yourself. We will find you and we will take you off our streets.

    And, this Task Force is already showing immediate signs of success. On Feb. 4th, Samual Paiania, a bank robbery fugitive was arrested by Task Force agents. Today, Nathan Brown, a federal fugitive was also captured by Task Force agents. Mr. Brown was arrested at a residence on the Big Island, with the assistance and support of: the DEA Air Support Unit; the Hawaii County Police Department patrol and criminal intelligence unit; the Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources Enforcement Division; and the U.S. Treasury Inspector General’s Office.

    And, I would like to thank each of these participating agencies for their assistance and co-operation in this Task Force arrest.

    In 1991, Mr. Brown was convicted of numerous counts of filing false federal tax returns. He was thereafter sentenced to approximately 6 years in prison, and he appealed. However, after losing his appeal, Mr. Brown failed to show up to begin serving his sentence. We have been looking for Mr. Brown for the last 10 years. I must add, that as a result of this case, Mr. Dennis “Bumpy” Kanahele admitted to interfering with a Deputy U.S. Marshal who was trying to arrest Mr. Brown in 1994 (3/16). On Feb. 2, 1998, U.S. District Judge Helen Gillmor sentenced Mr. Kanahele to 4-months of jail and 4-months of house arrest.

    Finally, I have assigned Assistant U.S. Attorney Larry Tong to network with this Task Force in its investigations. Mr. Tong is one of my most experienced litigators in this office and I am extremely confident in his ability to oversee these cases.

    Lingle Calls on Legislators to Allow People to Decide on Whether to Form Local School Boards -She Bashes House Education Bill, Calls it Shibai

    0

    “Laura Brown Image”

    Gov. Linda Lingle, at a March 7 press conference at Hickam Elementary School, again called on state legislators to give Hawaii citizens the right to determine whether Hawaii’s public education system should be overseen by local school boards, rather than one centralized board. She cited a 2003 OmniTrack poll that found 66 to 73 percent of Hawaii residents favor local school boards.

    However, Lingle and others wanting to decentralize to the now centralized education system, say some proposals by legislators may sound reasonable, but actually add layers of bureaucracy to the state system.

    For example, HB 289 requires the superintendent to “establish administrative units to provide administrative support to schools”; or increase Department of Education centralized government.

    Addressing HB 289, Lingle said, “The Legislature’s current proposal to create ‘advisory committees’ is shibai. The House’s proposed local school advisory committees would have no autonomy or local decision-making power because they would still report to a centralized board.”

    According to the text of this bill, parent, teacher and administrative input would be limited to merely testifying before their regional councils. A student, parent and teacher plus 4 unspecified members would form a “coordinating council.” Duties would include “informal assessments” of regional superintendents, prioritizing and “forwarding” a list of CIP projects to the statewide Board of Education and managing some grants. The rules and scope of the councils would not be established until after the law is passed.

    Governor-appointed school area committees (SACs) were abolished by the Legislature in 1998 because they did not have any authority or control any funding and therefore did not impact or improve student performance. Now, the House is trying to legislate the same useless governance model, except that members for each region would be appointed by the state Board of Education.

    During the 2001 Legislative Session, HB 2033 and SB2102 supporting 7-member elected district boards with a statewide board comprised of representative members from regional boards were approved by all members with the exception of one representative. The function of these boards was described in the bills as “fostering community partnerships” and prioritizing repair and maintenance within their districts while providing a regional monitoring function. SB 2102 SD1 HD2, died in Senate conference committee days before the end of the 2001 session.

    Lingle says she does not understand why the 2003 Legislature is now opposed to local school boards. “The only thing that I can think of that’s changed since then is there’s a new governor.”

    Ironically, while the Democrat-led House fights Lingle’s local school board proposal, SB 667 introduced by Senate Education Chair Norman Sakamoto, nearly duplicates last session’s bills. Additionally, it adds the following:

    *Creates a state board of education composed of seven members elected from seven school board districts and six members appointed by the governor with the advice and consent of the senate;

    *Creates seven regional education agencies as the primary administrative units for the delivery of educational services, to be governed by appointed boards of directors and administered by regional superintendents;

    *Delineates the roles and responsibilities of the state board of education and state superintendent and the regional education agency, its governing board, and regional superintendent;

    *Establishes school complex-based management (SCBM) within the regional education agencies.

    This bill would still require a constitutional amendment. Although the intent of the bill is to replace Department of Education district offices and personnel with these boards — at a savings estimated by some analysts to be as much as $75 million — DOE Superintendent Pat Hamamoto testified that seven regional boards may cost as much as $6 million per year to operate.

    According to a research document by William G. Ouchi, UCLA, to be published in California Policy Options 2003, the most effective education governance model is a bottom-up vs. top-down model.

    A model those favoring decentralization say Hawaii’s education leaders would do well to review before jumping into models proven not to work.

    ”’Laura Brown is the education reporter for HawaiiReporter.com and can be reached via email at”’ mailto:LauraBrown@hawaii.rr.com

    Next Stop, A Tax Hike

    0

    Well, you knew the other shoe was going to drop and it did! The Senate Ways & Means Committee pushed out a bill that will hike the general excise tax rate from 4 percent to 4.5 percent.

    To soften the blow on the poor, the Committee has also included the re-establishment of the food tax credit for those at the bottom end of the income scale. The reason? Funding for education, or so lawmakers explained. Lawmakers are relying on a poll conducted by one of the major Honolulu dailies, which quoted that readers would be willing to pay more in taxes to improve education and fix school facilities.

    Well, that excuse was quickly dispelled when the same paper noted in its editorial page that the question really focused on the point that people would be willing to pay more in taxes to improve education if policy makers and education administrators had a solution. However, at this time the paper noted, there does not appear to be a solution that either the Legislature or school administrators have that will promise improvement of public education in Hawaii. So why the tax hike? It appears that lawmakers are afraid that war will break out in the Middle East, which will have a severe impact not only on the economy but on state tax revenues. Lawmakers believe that by raising the general excise tax, the increased tax burden will be passed on to visitors as opposed to residents. But what if war breaks out and visitors stop coming to Hawaii, who then will pay the increased general excise tax?

    Of all the taxes levied in Hawaii, the general excise tax is the most regressive, taking more of a percentage out of lower income household budgets than it does from a middle or high income family budgets. As a result, any hike in the general excise tax hurts the poor, a fact that seems to have been lost on social service agencies who appeared at the hearing.

    They not only supported the hike but asked that the rate be raised another half percent to 5 percent to ensure social services are adequately funded to help the poor(?). So much for helping the poor by raising the tax that hurts the poor the most.

    To a large degree, the financial crisis facing lawmakers is a creation of their own. While lawmakers would like to blame the lack of tax revenues on a poor economy, all indicators seem to point in the other direction. In fact, one of the brighter spots in the state’s economy is construction, especially construction of new homes. As a result of lower interest rates, there is little inventory in the residential category. What it appears is that lawmakers have given away the store in recent years in the form of those darn tax credits.

    This is evidenced in the fact that general excise tax collections are increasing while net income tax collections are trailing last year’s collections. No doubt those tax incentives called tax credits have made a big dent on the state’s fiscal picture. Now lawmakers have to find other ways to pay for the state’s spending.

    Since lawmakers also don’t like cutting spending and state administrators, in particular education officials, scream every time there is another round of spending cut directives, lawmakers believe they can justify a tax increase. Saying that it is for education makes it sound even better. But the long and short of it is that all the rest of us are being asked to pick up the tab so that a few chosen taxpayers can take a free ride on the tax credits. This point was made to lawmakers when they first started down the tax credit path. But lawmakers chose to ignore that advice believing that they could stimulate the economy with these tax credits while refusing to make concurrent reductions in spending.

    So now the only alternative seems to be to raise taxes, especially if the governor is unwilling to tap the hurricane relief fund. Of course, that assumes that no more cuts will be considered by the Legislature.

    That also assumes that lawmakers don’t give away more of the store this session by handing out even more tax credits. Even one of Hawaii’s former governors has expressed alarm at how current leaders of the state spent the state’s meager resources in the form of tax credits and tax incentives.

    He notes that both liberals and conservatives have collaborated to raid the state treasury, raids that would go unnoticed if there was a lot of money but are painfully obvious when there are no resources. So it is now up to taxpayers across the state. They can agree to support the tax hike, or they can tell their lawmakers to find another alternative. In any case, it seems that lawmakers need to exercise a lot more fiscal discipline and restraint.

    ”’Lowell L. Kalapa is the president of the Tax Foundation of Hawaii, a private, non-profit educational organization. For more information, please call 536-4587 or log on to”’ https://www.tfhawaii.org

    Grassroot Perspective – March 10, 2003-Meanwhile, SUV Owners to the Rescue in the Nation's Capital; North Dakotans Tell Their Congressional Delegation to Get With the Tax Cut Program; Political Parties Take Opposing Sides in Health-care Debate

    0

    “Dick Rowland Image”

    ”Shoots (News, Views and Quotes)”

    – Meanwhile, SUV Owners to the Rescue in the Nation’s Capital

    In an ironic twist, in the same week that the Sierra Club was calling on the IRS to use its audit power to target small business SUV owners for harassment, Washington D.C. area hospitals and nursing homes hit by the 6th largest snow storm in the city’s history put out urgent appeals via local media asking 4×4 owners to help them get their emergency personnel in to work. There was no word as to whether the Sierra Club believes the IRS should consider the good Samaritans’ efforts to be tax deductible. Nor was Ariana Huffington’s legion of hybrid cars seen racing the SUV’s to the rescue.

    – North Dakotans Tell Their Congressional Delegation to Get With the Tax Cut Program

    North Dakota’s State House recently passed a resolution instructing their federally elected officials to stop stalling and get to work for North Dakota — and to pass the President’s Economic Growth Package. Tired of their U.S. Senators (Byron Dorgan and Kent Conrad) partisan, obstructionist activities, the resolution was overwhelmingly passed by voice vote in the North Dakota State House. It explains the provisions of the package, as well as instructs Dorgan, Conrad and Congressman Earl Pomeroy to support and vote to enact President Bush’s Growth and Tax Relief Plan. It now moves to the state Senate for consideration.

    Above articles are quoted from Small Business Survival Committee 2/20/03 www.membership@sbsc.org

    ”Roots (Food for Thought)”

    – Political Parties Take Opposing Sides in Health-care Debate

    Author: Robert Goldberg

    Published: The Heartland Institute 02/01/2003

    The debate between Democrats and Republicans over health-care issues in 2003 promises to be more productive than it has been in quite some time.

    Republicans may finally show some interest in a topic that is near the top of voters’ lists of concerns, though early mishaps suggest they may once again blow the chance to lead. Democrats will update their version of the Fear Factor — emitting visions of people who are sick, dying, or dead without health care coverage — and offer Americans the opportunity to get medical coverage through Medicaid, mandates, and higher taxes.

    Democrats Offer Bigger Government

    The Democrat proposal — shaped largely by its liberal wing with the help of Families USA — bumps up against the state Medicaid programs already facing large deficits and comprising the largest portion of state budgets.

    There are already 37 million adults and children served by Medicaid each year, and Democrats want to add 40 million more. The idea of having nearly half of all Americans enrolled in government-run health programs (if you include 35 million senior citizens receiving Medicare) might excite Families USA and others, but it’s highly unlikely states will want to take on the new burden. Medicaid spending is increasing at twice the rate of overall state government spending.

    The Democrats will respond to state concerns by calling for higher taxes or mandates requiring private-sector firms either to cover their employees or pay into Medicaid. The other “choice” will be “allowing” the uninsured to buy into Medicaid with their own money, federal subsidies, or some combination of the two.

    But states are already planning ways to scale back Medicaid to save money, including limits on who is eligible, cuts in fees paid to doctors, restrictions on access to new drugs, and reduced services to disabled children and the mentally ill.

    Unlike people with private health insurance, Medicaid recipients must fight with other interest groups for scarce public dollars. Indeed, over the years, health services under Medicaid have taken on a Hobbesian form: nasty, brutish, and short-lived.

    As Medicaid and the state-run CHIP program have become the insurers of first resort, they have crowded out appropriate care for the poor and disabled, placing inordinate demands on the public treasury. Now, real and ugly rationing is taking place at the very moment Democrats want to shove millions more Americans into these programs.

    The right response is to make a wide range of health care plans more affordable and available, not to prop up Medicaid or scapegoat the usual suspect, the pharmaceutical industry. But Democrats will blame Medicaid’s woes on rising drug costs, ignoring the facts that (a) prescription drugs represent only 9 percent of federal Medicaid costs and 12 percent of total Medicaid program spending and (b) drugs are far less expensive than the alternative, in many cases hospitalization.

    Republicans Send Mixed Signals

    Since battling the Clinton health plan in 1993, Republicans have been largely bereft of any real conviction about health care issues. Rather, the past Republican accomplishments — including the expansion of Medicaid and the creation of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program — can best be characterized as Ted Kennedy with half the calories.

    Today, President George W. Bush appears ready to lead congressional Republicans in a much different direction: giving Americans the money and tax breaks they need to choose their own health care and preserve their relationships with doctors and hospitals they trust.

    But poor political habits are difficult to break. Tom Scully, director of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, has all but handed the Democrats their talking points by telling hospital executives the way for states to control Medicaid spending is to take on the drug companies. “Not many states have the courage to take this on,” Scully said. “I love the drug companies, but I think it’s insane (for Medicaid) to charge a $1 to $3 co-payment to buy Celebrex and Vioxx. … Celebrex and Vioxx are no better than Motrin. It’s a joke.”

    What’s a joke is that the bleeding ulcers and stomach problems associated with long-term Motrin use used to be one of the primary reasons the elderly were admitted to the hospital, and Scully apparently doesn’t know it. It’s also a joke he doesn’t realize many of the “courageous” actions states are using to control drug spending — such as limiting access to new drugs for schizophrenia — are causing untold unnecessary suffering and driving up total Medicaid expenditures. Scully’s words and ignorance will come back to hurt Republicans as they seek to wage and win a principled fight on health care.

    Medicaid is falling apart because it is a government-run health plan — not because of prescription drug costs. The sooner Republicans and moderate Democrats find and stick to that message, the better it will be for Americans in search of better health care.

    Robert Goldberg is senior fellow and director of the Center for Medical Progress at the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.

    Above article is quoted from https://www.heartland.org Health Care News February 2003

    ”Evergreen (Today’s Quote)”

    “As a man is said to have a right to his property, he may be equally said to have a property in his rights. Where an excess of power prevails, property of no sort is duly respected. No man is sage in his opinions, his person, his faculties, or his possessions.” — James Madison, National Gazzette [1792]

    ”’Edited by Richard O. Rowland, president of Grassroot Institute of Hawaii. He can be reached at (808) 487-4959 or by email at:”’ mailto:grassroot@hawaii.rr.com ”’For more information, see its Web site at:”’ https://www.grassrootinstitute.org/

    Grassroot Perspective – March 10, 2003-Meanwhile, SUV Owners to the Rescue in the Nation’s Capital; North Dakotans Tell Their Congressional Delegation to Get With the Tax Cut Program; Political Parties Take Opposing Sides in Health-care Debate

    0

    “Dick Rowland Image”

    ”Shoots (News, Views and Quotes)”

    – Meanwhile, SUV Owners to the Rescue in the Nation’s Capital

    In an ironic twist, in the same week that the Sierra Club was calling on the IRS to use its audit power to target small business SUV owners for harassment, Washington D.C. area hospitals and nursing homes hit by the 6th largest snow storm in the city’s history put out urgent appeals via local media asking 4×4 owners to help them get their emergency personnel in to work. There was no word as to whether the Sierra Club believes the IRS should consider the good Samaritans’ efforts to be tax deductible. Nor was Ariana Huffington’s legion of hybrid cars seen racing the SUV’s to the rescue.

    – North Dakotans Tell Their Congressional Delegation to Get With the Tax Cut Program

    North Dakota’s State House recently passed a resolution instructing their federally elected officials to stop stalling and get to work for North Dakota — and to pass the President’s Economic Growth Package. Tired of their U.S. Senators (Byron Dorgan and Kent Conrad) partisan, obstructionist activities, the resolution was overwhelmingly passed by voice vote in the North Dakota State House. It explains the provisions of the package, as well as instructs Dorgan, Conrad and Congressman Earl Pomeroy to support and vote to enact President Bush’s Growth and Tax Relief Plan. It now moves to the state Senate for consideration.

    Above articles are quoted from Small Business Survival Committee 2/20/03 www.membership@sbsc.org

    ”Roots (Food for Thought)”

    – Political Parties Take Opposing Sides in Health-care Debate

    Author: Robert Goldberg

    Published: The Heartland Institute 02/01/2003

    The debate between Democrats and Republicans over health-care issues in 2003 promises to be more productive than it has been in quite some time.

    Republicans may finally show some interest in a topic that is near the top of voters’ lists of concerns, though early mishaps suggest they may once again blow the chance to lead. Democrats will update their version of the Fear Factor — emitting visions of people who are sick, dying, or dead without health care coverage — and offer Americans the opportunity to get medical coverage through Medicaid, mandates, and higher taxes.

    Democrats Offer Bigger Government

    The Democrat proposal — shaped largely by its liberal wing with the help of Families USA — bumps up against the state Medicaid programs already facing large deficits and comprising the largest portion of state budgets.

    There are already 37 million adults and children served by Medicaid each year, and Democrats want to add 40 million more. The idea of having nearly half of all Americans enrolled in government-run health programs (if you include 35 million senior citizens receiving Medicare) might excite Families USA and others, but it’s highly unlikely states will want to take on the new burden. Medicaid spending is increasing at twice the rate of overall state government spending.

    The Democrats will respond to state concerns by calling for higher taxes or mandates requiring private-sector firms either to cover their employees or pay into Medicaid. The other “choice” will be “allowing” the uninsured to buy into Medicaid with their own money, federal subsidies, or some combination of the two.

    But states are already planning ways to scale back Medicaid to save money, including limits on who is eligible, cuts in fees paid to doctors, restrictions on access to new drugs, and reduced services to disabled children and the mentally ill.

    Unlike people with private health insurance, Medicaid recipients must fight with other interest groups for scarce public dollars. Indeed, over the years, health services under Medicaid have taken on a Hobbesian form: nasty, brutish, and short-lived.

    As Medicaid and the state-run CHIP program have become the insurers of first resort, they have crowded out appropriate care for the poor and disabled, placing inordinate demands on the public treasury. Now, real and ugly rationing is taking place at the very moment Democrats want to shove millions more Americans into these programs.

    The right response is to make a wide range of health care plans more affordable and available, not to prop up Medicaid or scapegoat the usual suspect, the pharmaceutical industry. But Democrats will blame Medicaid’s woes on rising drug costs, ignoring the facts that (a) prescription drugs represent only 9 percent of federal Medicaid costs and 12 percent of total Medicaid program spending and (b) drugs are far less expensive than the alternative, in many cases hospitalization.

    Republicans Send Mixed Signals

    Since battling the Clinton health plan in 1993, Republicans have been largely bereft of any real conviction about health care issues. Rather, the past Republican accomplishments — including the expansion of Medicaid and the creation of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program — can best be characterized as Ted Kennedy with half the calories.

    Today, President George W. Bush appears ready to lead congressional Republicans in a much different direction: giving Americans the money and tax breaks they need to choose their own health care and preserve their relationships with doctors and hospitals they trust.

    But poor political habits are difficult to break. Tom Scully, director of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, has all but handed the Democrats their talking points by telling hospital executives the way for states to control Medicaid spending is to take on the drug companies. “Not many states have the courage to take this on,” Scully said. “I love the drug companies, but I think it’s insane (for Medicaid) to charge a $1 to $3 co-payment to buy Celebrex and Vioxx. … Celebrex and Vioxx are no better than Motrin. It’s a joke.”

    What’s a joke is that the bleeding ulcers and stomach problems associated with long-term Motrin use used to be one of the primary reasons the elderly were admitted to the hospital, and Scully apparently doesn’t know it. It’s also a joke he doesn’t realize many of the “courageous” actions states are using to control drug spending — such as limiting access to new drugs for schizophrenia — are causing untold unnecessary suffering and driving up total Medicaid expenditures. Scully’s words and ignorance will come back to hurt Republicans as they seek to wage and win a principled fight on health care.

    Medicaid is falling apart because it is a government-run health plan — not because of prescription drug costs. The sooner Republicans and moderate Democrats find and stick to that message, the better it will be for Americans in search of better health care.

    Robert Goldberg is senior fellow and director of the Center for Medical Progress at the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.

    Above article is quoted from https://www.heartland.org Health Care News February 2003

    ”Evergreen (Today’s Quote)”

    “As a man is said to have a right to his property, he may be equally said to have a property in his rights. Where an excess of power prevails, property of no sort is duly respected. No man is sage in his opinions, his person, his faculties, or his possessions.” — James Madison, National Gazzette [1792]

    ”’Edited by Richard O. Rowland, president of Grassroot Institute of Hawaii. He can be reached at (808) 487-4959 or by email at:”’ mailto:grassroot@hawaii.rr.com ”’For more information, see its Web site at:”’ https://www.grassrootinstitute.org/