Tuesday, April 23, 2024
More
    Home Blog Page 1962

    Legislative Hearing Notices – March 10, 2003

    0

    The following hearing notices, which are subject to change, were sorted and taken from the Hawaii State Capitol Web site. Please check that site for updates and/or changes to the schedule at

    “Hawaii State Legislature Sidebar”

    Go there and click on the Hearing Date to view the Hearing Notice.

    Hearings notices for both House and Senate measures in all committees:

    Hearing

    ”Date Time Bill Number Measure Title Committee”

    3/10/03 9:00 AM SCR33 URGING THE STATE TO PURSUE LITIGATION AGAINST CHEVRONTEXACO FOR NONPAYMENT OF TAXES. CPH

    3/10/03 9:00 AM SR21 URGING THE STATE TO PURSUE LITIGATION AGAINST CHEVRONTEXACO FOR NONPAYMENT OF TAXES. CPH

    3/10/03 9:00 AM HCR22 URGING THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY TO RELAX RESTRICTIONS ON THE GRANTING OF NONIMMIGRANT VISAS TO NATIONALS OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA FOR THE PURPOSE OF BUSINESS, TOURISM, AND STUDY IN THE UNITED STATES. INT

    3/10/03 9:00 AM HCR28 REQUESTING CONGRESS TO FULLY FUND THE MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE ACCOUNT AND INVOLVE WOMEN AS FULL AND ACTIVE PARTICIPANTS IN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS IN THEIR NATIONS. INT

    3/10/03 9:00 AM HCR29 REQUESTING CONGRESS TO END THE “GLOBAL GAG RULE” IMPOSED ON INTERNATIONAL FAMILY PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS. INT

    3/10/03 9:00 AM HCR35 SUPPORTING THE PACIFIC BASIN ECONOMIC COUNCIL AND ENCOURAGING IT TO MAINTAIN ITS HEADQUARTERS IN HAWAII. INT

    3/10/03 9:00 AM HCR50 URGING THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS TO ELIMINATE STATE AND LOCAL COST SHARE REQUIREMENTS FOR HOMELAND SECURITY GRANTS. INT

    3/10/03 9:00 AM HCR52 ESTABLISHING A SISTER STATE-PREFECTURE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE STATE OF HAWAII OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE EHIME PREFECTURE OF JAPAN. INT

    3/10/03 9:00 AM HR26 URGING THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY TO RELAX RESTRICTIONS ON THE GRANTING OF NONIMMIGRANT VISAS TO NATIONALS OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA FOR THE PURPOSE OF BUSINESS, TOURISM, AND STUDY IN THE UNITED STATES. INT

    3/10/03 9:00 AM HR33 REQUESTING CONGRESS TO FULLY FUND THE MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE ACCOUNT AND INVOLVE WOMEN AS FULL AND ACTIVE PARTICIPANTS IN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS IN THEIR NATIONS. INT

    3/10/03 9:00 AM HR34 REQUESTING CONGRESS TO END THE “GLOBAL GAG RULE” IMPOSED ON INTERNATIONAL FAMILY PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS. INT

    3/10/03 9:00 AM HR38 SUPPORTING THE PACIFIC BASIN ECONOMIC COUNCIL AND ENCOURAGING IT TO MAINTAIN ITS HEADQUARTERS IN HAWAII. INT

    3/10/03 9:00 AM HR53 URGING THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS TO ELIMINATE STATE AND LOCAL COST SHARE REQUIREMENTS FOR HOMELAND SECURITY GRANTS. INT

    3/10/03 9:00 AM HR55 ESTABLISHING A SISTER STATE-PREFECTURE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE STATE OF HAWAII OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE EHIME PREFECTURE OF JAPAN. INT

    ”Date Time Bill Number Measure Title Committee”

    3/10/03 1:00 PM None Informational Briefing EDN/EDU/SAT

    3/10/03 1:00 PM SCR5 EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR THE MILITARY AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF HAWAII IN ITS EFFORTS TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR MILITARY PERSONNEL STATIONED IN HAWAII. TMG

    3/10/03 1:00 PM SCR27 REQUESTING THE HAWAII CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION TO LOOK INTO EXPANDING THE ANTITRUST EXEMPTION TO ENABLE HAWAIIAN AIRLINES TO COORDINATE INDIVIDUAL ROUTE SCHEDULES. TMG

    3/10/03 1:00 PM SCR29 URGING THE STATE, COUNTIES, AND PARTICIPATING PRIVATE ENTITIES TO SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT AND ESTABLISHMENT OF AN OFFICIALLY RECOGNIZED URBAN SEARCH AND RESCUE TEAM IN HAWAII. TMG

    3/10/03 1:00 PM SR16 REQUESTING THE HAWAII CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION TO LOOK INTO EXPANDING THE ANTITRUST EXEMPTION TO ENABLE HAWAIIAN AIRLINES TO COORDINATE INDIVIDUAL ROUTE SCHEDULES. TMG

    3/10/03 1:00 PM SR17 URGING THE STATE, COUNTIES, AND PARTICIPATING PRIVATE ENTITIES TO SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT AND ESTABLISHMENT OF AN OFFICIALLY RECOGNIZED URBAN SEARCH AND RESCUE TEAM IN HAWAII. TMG

    ”Date Time Bill Number Measure Title Committee”

    3/10/03 1:15 PM HB29 HD1 RELATING TO MEAL BREAKS. LBR

    3/10/03 1:15 PM HB132 HD1 RELATING TO PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES. LBR

    3/10/03 1:15 PM HB287 HD3 RELATING TO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES. LBR

    3/10/03 1:15 PM HB290 HD2 RELATING TO UNEMPLOYMENT. LBR

    3/10/03 1:15 PM HB389 HD2 RELATING TO FAMILY LEAVE. LBR

    3/10/03 1:15 PM HB531 RELATING TO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES. LBR

    3/10/03 1:15 PM HB968 HD1 RELATING TO UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS. LBR

    3/10/03 1:15 PM HB986 HD2 RELATING TO DEATH BENEFITS OF SURVIVING CHILDREN OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES. LBR

    3/10/03 1:15 PM HB1373 RELATING TO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES. LBR

    ”’To reach legislators, see:”’ “Representatives at a Glance” and “Senators at a Glance”

    Taking Issue With HawaiiReporter.com's Coverage

    0

    Hello, as a center-of-the-road political person who reads the HawaiiReporter for news, I would like to point out that one of the things I find particularly distasteful are the non-factual rants I periodically see on the sight.

    Most recently it has been the carrying on about the Honolulu Advertiser’s poll, which surveyed 603 people. I am sure there is a statistical basis for the selection of approximately 603 people as a random sample. Whether the question was asked in a unbiased manner is another matter, I believe the phrasing was intended to encourage yes answers. Your act of drawing conclusions between of the Hawaii Reporter’s periodic polls, which are even worse than the Advertiser’s since your sample is not random, and the Advertiser’s is tiresome and ridiculous.

    Another example was all the comments added into the text of the mayor’s address. Text added to point out incorrect statements are a useful item, but you filled that speech with ridiculous commentary, which was as tiresome as the speech.

    Most of the news analysis, which seems accurate, though right leaning, I find interesting and well done.

    You may want to point out to readers that Gov. Lingle, whom I admire, quoted a survey of 700 people in an article on the establishment of individual school boards in Friday’s Star-Bulletin.

    ”’Jon Winsley can be reached via email at:”’ mailto:jon@winsley.us

    Taking Issue With HawaiiReporter.com’s Coverage

    0

    Hello, as a center-of-the-road political person who reads the HawaiiReporter for news, I would like to point out that one of the things I find particularly distasteful are the non-factual rants I periodically see on the sight.

    Most recently it has been the carrying on about the Honolulu Advertiser’s poll, which surveyed 603 people. I am sure there is a statistical basis for the selection of approximately 603 people as a random sample. Whether the question was asked in a unbiased manner is another matter, I believe the phrasing was intended to encourage yes answers. Your act of drawing conclusions between of the Hawaii Reporter’s periodic polls, which are even worse than the Advertiser’s since your sample is not random, and the Advertiser’s is tiresome and ridiculous.

    Another example was all the comments added into the text of the mayor’s address. Text added to point out incorrect statements are a useful item, but you filled that speech with ridiculous commentary, which was as tiresome as the speech.

    Most of the news analysis, which seems accurate, though right leaning, I find interesting and well done.

    You may want to point out to readers that Gov. Lingle, whom I admire, quoted a survey of 700 people in an article on the establishment of individual school boards in Friday’s Star-Bulletin.

    ”’Jon Winsley can be reached via email at:”’ mailto:jon@winsley.us

    HawaiiReporter.com Should Poll Readers Whether it is Heroic or Scoundrel-like

    0

    New Poll: Vote here if you think the Hawaii Reporters articles is Heroic (written in an unbias manner, not to favor one party over another) or Scoundrel-like (tabloid trash that would not even make the National Enquirer).

    ”’Stan Agnus can be reached via email at:”’ mailto:stanags@mail.com

    War Does Not Boil Down to Good Guys vs. Bad Guys

    0

    The thrust of your story seems based on the idea that one can’t support our wonderful military, and yet be against our president’s precipitous rush to war. Life is more complex than “good guys” vs. “bad guys.” One can be a patriot ”’and”’ veteran, and still be against this war. Those “party crashers” were also good Americans expressing their heartfelt opinions. Virtually every demonstration of any sort will attract counter-demonstrators; Shocking, yeah?

    ”’Mrs. Charters is a resident of Honolulu and can be reached via email at:”’ mailto:tomapril@msn.com

    Appalled by Animal Quarantine in Hawaii

    0

    I just wanted to let you know how appalled I am by the animal quarantine enforced by Hawaii. I’m very happy to hear that a Coalition is fighting to end this savage treatment for our animals.

    I am a Registered Nurse and have visited your state several times. I am planning on looking into doing some travel nursing in Hawaii in a few years when my son goes off to college. However, I just can’t see myself parting with my Golden Retriever “Shadow” or subjecting him to that kind of cruelty and abuse.

    I hope this Coalition group, which I have now joined, can get these outdated law eradicated by the time that I plan to spend there, not only for me but for everyone who wants to bring their beloved pets into the state.

    It is very shameful to me as an American that in our world of medicine and technology that the state of Hawaii has to rely on something that is outdated, ridiculous and cruel.

    ”’Cindy McClure is an R.N. in New Baltimore, MI and can be reached via email at:”’ mailto:goaliemomcm@hotmail.com

    Response to: What You Should Know About War and the Economy-Economically Speaking, Peace is Preferable to War; Wining is Expensive But Losing Costs More

    “ORENDT-Cir-Flg Image”

    Although I agree that military spending is bad for the economy, social program spending is even more so. The war on drugs is by far money worse spent.

    A lot of military spending goes toward the development of new weapons. The use of those weapons is bad economically as the broken window example illustrates.

    “What You Should Know About War and the Economy Sidebar”

    However, the development of new weapons is good economically for a few reasons. One, there are indeed beneficial scientific, engineering and commercial spin-offs from weapons programs. Two, superior weapons are a good deterrent toward war, especially when linked with an administration that puts the weapons to use when necessary as in Desert Storm. Less collateral damage results from a surgical strike with smart bombs and is indeed preferable to dropping a larger, less accurate bomb. The new unmanned, remotely controlled reconnaissance and attack aircraft are preferable to putting American pilots at risk.

    “First Airborne Laser Weapon sidebar”

    Also, currently under development is the first airborne laser weapon, which could be used to intercept Scud missiles.

    A lot of the anti-war rhetoric focuses on the war on Iraq. Let us not forget that Iraq is merely the first target of the war on terrorism. It is hoped that a swift, decisive victory in Iraq will motivate other countries, which currently sponsor terrorism, to clean their own houses. If this does not happen there will be war beyond Iraq.

    “John Orendt Bio Sidebar”

    Governor's Office to Run Out of Money in a Matter of Days-Meanwhile House Majority Plays Partisan Politics, Withholds Full Funding

    0

    The Office of the Governor will run out of money at the end of March 2003, according to Bob Awana, chief of staff for Gov. Linda Lingle, because the $1 million emergency appropriation the governor requested several weeks ago from the state Legislature has not yet been approved by the House and Senate.

    Lingle, who worked from the moment she got into office to balance the state budget with at least a $180 million shortfall, was told three days before she took office that the Legislature had axed the governor’s FY 2003 $3.4 million budget by $993,000.

    But that wasn’t the only bad news. Former Gov. Benjamin Cayetano already had spent nearly all of the $3,300,700 remaining, according to his then Chief of Staff Sam Callejo, leaving just $400,000 for Lingle to operate the governor’s office for six more months until the end of the fiscal year in June 2003.

    Though the new administration scraped together slightly more than the $400,000 to keep the office going for three months, instead of the two months the $400,000 would normally fund, the jobs of the 65 remaining personnel in the governor’s office are now in jeopardy. That is because there is simply no more money to pay them or their benefits after March 2003, Awana says. The governor needs back the $993,000, or nearly $1 million slashed from her budget before she ever took office, Awana says, and she needs it now.

    But the Democrats majority in the state House refuses to acknowledge the governor’s tenuous position, saying she has plenty of money to operate her office, in fact, according to the state Rep. Scott Saiki, the governor has $3.4 million, more than was allocated in FY 2002 or FY 2001.

    House Finance Chair Dwight Takamine attacked Lingle, saying his committee had slashed her emergency request to $590,000, because she did not need the $1 million. He said the governor imposed a 2.5 percent to 5 percent cut on all state agencies, so her budget should have to be cut too. He also said she should not have asked for $1 million, when she really just needed $993,000 to make up the difference. He then attempted to justify the further cuts, saying the governor’s office should suffer at least another 5 percent reduction for her entire executive branch operations.

    House Republicans fired back that taking $410,000 from a $1 million appropriation is considerably more than a 5 percent or 10 percent cut. House Minority Leader Galen Fox pleaded with the Democrat leadership to restore the cuts and pass the full emergency appropriation immediately. The debate went on for more than two hours.

    Democrats also began to make fun of the governor for requesting in the $1 million emergency an allocation, because a small portion of the allocation was to be used to buy furniture and recover some existing furniture for the governor’s home.

    When Lingle moved in to the new governor’s home, she learned the home had been constructed but left completely unfurnished in the end of 2002 by the prior administration, and there was no money allocated for furniture.

    State Rep. Kirk Caldwell, D- Manoa, went through Lingle’s list of furniture items requested, piece by piece, mocking the governor for requesting an armoire, comparing the governor to King Louis of France who he says was the first person to have an armoire. He went on to explain to the Legislature what an armoire was, but was stopped by Republican House members who pointed out many Democrat legislators actually have armoire, or stand-alone closets, in their offices. Cauldwell was not deterred, saying the governor should not be requesting rugs for the wood-floored house, or window coverings for the now open windows, or an entertainment center for $2,000. He pointed out the new home had been built with private funds raised by the former governor, and that Lingle should get private funds to furnish the home.

    Rep. Michael Puamamo Kahikina, D-Waianae, said Lingle should just move back into Washington Place, where the former governor and his wife lived, until the state comes into better fiscal times. “If it was good enough for the former governor and first lady, it should be good enough for her.”

    But Republicans point out Gov. Benjamin Cayetano had built the new home to keep his promise to the Hawaiian people that he’d return Washington Place, the home of former Queen Liliuokalani, to the Hawaiian people and the general public, before he left office in 2002. That was one of the few promises he kept, and they don’t want to be responsible for breaking his promise to the Hawaiian people.

    At the end of a considerable debate that went on for more than two hours, the Republicans were forced to vote with strong reservations in favor of a bill that would approve the governor’s emergency request at $590,000 instead of $1 million. That is because if they had voted no, no money would have been allocated to the governor’s office, not even the $590,000, because the bill would have died. Now the request goes to the Senate for its approval and consideration.

    Those upset with the actions of the House, say the the House played politics with the governor in order to make her job more difficult and in order to put her office operations and staff at risk. They pointed to the fact that the bill was the last of several hundred in the House, before it was passed to the Senate, a comment the Democat leadership took great offense to.

    Those upset with the House’s action point to the fact that the Legislature recently sent its budget request for funding to operate this session, a request the governor immediately signed.

    While some suggested she should hold the $1 million in funding until the Democrats approve her $1 million funding, the governor said she doesn’t want to play political games.

    Governor’s Office to Run Out of Money in a Matter of Days-Meanwhile House Majority Plays Partisan Politics, Withholds Full Funding

    0

    The Office of the Governor will run out of money at the end of March 2003, according to Bob Awana, chief of staff for Gov. Linda Lingle, because the $1 million emergency appropriation the governor requested several weeks ago from the state Legislature has not yet been approved by the House and Senate.

    Lingle, who worked from the moment she got into office to balance the state budget with at least a $180 million shortfall, was told three days before she took office that the Legislature had axed the governor’s FY 2003 $3.4 million budget by $993,000.

    But that wasn’t the only bad news. Former Gov. Benjamin Cayetano already had spent nearly all of the $3,300,700 remaining, according to his then Chief of Staff Sam Callejo, leaving just $400,000 for Lingle to operate the governor’s office for six more months until the end of the fiscal year in June 2003.

    Though the new administration scraped together slightly more than the $400,000 to keep the office going for three months, instead of the two months the $400,000 would normally fund, the jobs of the 65 remaining personnel in the governor’s office are now in jeopardy. That is because there is simply no more money to pay them or their benefits after March 2003, Awana says. The governor needs back the $993,000, or nearly $1 million slashed from her budget before she ever took office, Awana says, and she needs it now.

    But the Democrats majority in the state House refuses to acknowledge the governor’s tenuous position, saying she has plenty of money to operate her office, in fact, according to the state Rep. Scott Saiki, the governor has $3.4 million, more than was allocated in FY 2002 or FY 2001.

    House Finance Chair Dwight Takamine attacked Lingle, saying his committee had slashed her emergency request to $590,000, because she did not need the $1 million. He said the governor imposed a 2.5 percent to 5 percent cut on all state agencies, so her budget should have to be cut too. He also said she should not have asked for $1 million, when she really just needed $993,000 to make up the difference. He then attempted to justify the further cuts, saying the governor’s office should suffer at least another 5 percent reduction for her entire executive branch operations.

    House Republicans fired back that taking $410,000 from a $1 million appropriation is considerably more than a 5 percent or 10 percent cut. House Minority Leader Galen Fox pleaded with the Democrat leadership to restore the cuts and pass the full emergency appropriation immediately. The debate went on for more than two hours.

    Democrats also began to make fun of the governor for requesting in the $1 million emergency an allocation, because a small portion of the allocation was to be used to buy furniture and recover some existing furniture for the governor’s home.

    When Lingle moved in to the new governor’s home, she learned the home had been constructed but left completely unfurnished in the end of 2002 by the prior administration, and there was no money allocated for furniture.

    State Rep. Kirk Caldwell, D- Manoa, went through Lingle’s list of furniture items requested, piece by piece, mocking the governor for requesting an armoire, comparing the governor to King Louis of France who he says was the first person to have an armoire. He went on to explain to the Legislature what an armoire was, but was stopped by Republican House members who pointed out many Democrat legislators actually have armoire, or stand-alone closets, in their offices. Cauldwell was not deterred, saying the governor should not be requesting rugs for the wood-floored house, or window coverings for the now open windows, or an entertainment center for $2,000. He pointed out the new home had been built with private funds raised by the former governor, and that Lingle should get private funds to furnish the home.

    Rep. Michael Puamamo Kahikina, D-Waianae, said Lingle should just move back into Washington Place, where the former governor and his wife lived, until the state comes into better fiscal times. “If it was good enough for the former governor and first lady, it should be good enough for her.”

    But Republicans point out Gov. Benjamin Cayetano had built the new home to keep his promise to the Hawaiian people that he’d return Washington Place, the home of former Queen Liliuokalani, to the Hawaiian people and the general public, before he left office in 2002. That was one of the few promises he kept, and they don’t want to be responsible for breaking his promise to the Hawaiian people.

    At the end of a considerable debate that went on for more than two hours, the Republicans were forced to vote with strong reservations in favor of a bill that would approve the governor’s emergency request at $590,000 instead of $1 million. That is because if they had voted no, no money would have been allocated to the governor’s office, not even the $590,000, because the bill would have died. Now the request goes to the Senate for its approval and consideration.

    Those upset with the actions of the House, say the the House played politics with the governor in order to make her job more difficult and in order to put her office operations and staff at risk. They pointed to the fact that the bill was the last of several hundred in the House, before it was passed to the Senate, a comment the Democat leadership took great offense to.

    Those upset with the House’s action point to the fact that the Legislature recently sent its budget request for funding to operate this session, a request the governor immediately signed.

    While some suggested she should hold the $1 million in funding until the Democrats approve her $1 million funding, the governor said she doesn’t want to play political games.

    Raising Taxes on Every Level Not Good Government, Especially When the Nation is on the Brink of War

    The situation sounds almost surreal, beyond belief. This nation stands on the brink of war. Hawaii’s economy, a major portion of which is dependent upon tourism, will certainly decline to some extent when the war begins. The national debt is approaching 7 trillion dollars and the vast majority of state governments are awash in red ink from their profligate spending. The stock market is in the third year of decline with no end in sight. One of our primary tourist markets, Japan, is in such an extended depression that it is experiencing monetary deflation, despite all that government efforts to alleviate the situation.

    With all these potential threats to Hawaii’s economy, what is the best answer that our elected officials and representatives in this state can come up with? To raise taxes at every possible level. From the city level, to the state level, and wherever possible in between, raise taxes. Just attempting to list all the revenue increases sought by the varying levels of government is where this becomes surrealistic.

    Some want to raise gas taxes, already among the highest in the nation, to repair roads. Some want to raise the general excise tax to pay for schools. In the Advertiser this morning it was reported House Human Services Chairman Michael Kahikina, D-44th (Nanakuli, Honokai Hale), said it would be “responsible” for the state to do the same for social service and the most needy. When in doubt, the responsible thing to do is just raise taxes!

    There are proposals to tax every working adult, the largest tax increase in the state’s history, to provide very limited assistance to seniors in nursing home care. There are schemes afoot to give the hotel room taxes to the outlying counties and give Honolulu unprecedented taxing authority. As it stands now Mayor Jeremy Harris just wants to raise property taxes.

    This is just the tip of the iceberg. Frankly, the plethora of tax proposals and clearly disingenuous maneuverings, such as making the Pacific Health Center in Waipio, “exempt from all statutes, ordinances, charter provisions, and rules of any governmental agency relating to planning, zoning, construction standards for subdivisions, development and improvement of land, and the construction of units thereon,” or the stealth bill that, “will abolish the Hawaii Health Systems Corporation and puts its hospitals under the state Department of Health,” are so numerous that it is difficult to keep up with them all.

    There are increases in user fees for parks. Talk of increases in bus fares and moorage fees. All the while there isn’t the slightest consideration in reining in expensive and uncertain proposals. Controversial issues like the inner city BRT or ending the extravagant “On the Beach” functions continue as before. I worked downtown and we dreaded the “On the Beach” events because traffic dropped to next to nothing, especially during the Sunset events. One thing about government officials, they never let reality get in the way of their presuppositions. If people are eating brunch or watching a free movie on the beach, they can’t be in stores spending money. Logic always takes a back seat to ideology.

    Throughout all of this is a clear contempt on the part of the legislators and officials that propose these changes for the people of Hawaii. The dominant party in this state has a mindset that it knows what is best for the people of Hawaii, whether we can afford it or not. That every tax increase is going to damage the economy and further impoverish the people of this state is never considered. The attitude is, “If you don’t like it, leave. Get off our rock.”

    Something is happening in the land though, which began to become evident the last election. The election of the Republican governor of Hawaii is an indication. One can see it in the refusal to let the socialist mindset go unchallenged. On every front it is being called for what it is: divisive, damaging and counter productive. We simply cannot, as a state or a nation, continue to progress with the same failed ideas. Yet our legislators will not get the message, stubbornly refuse to change and continue to play the same old political games.

    The result is something I think these legislators are completely missing. That something is the people are coming to a slow boil. There is a smoldering anger building toward this cynical manipulation of the system for political reasons. The subterfuge no longer works. In this state there is an anger building at the obvious corruption that riddles all levels of government, from curbstones to hospitals. There is a deep resentment building at the idea that we all have deep pockets that governments can endlessly pluck at will for whatever the latest boondoggle happens to be.

    Linda Lingle was elected to the governorship, in part, based upon her proposals to change the education system. The quite specific proposals which she submitted have been shelved and killed by the Democrat majority for purely political reasons. She made a pledge not to raise taxes so the Democrat majority looks as if the response is to present her with a wide array of tax increases. She will either have to veto these tax increases, raid the Hurricane Fund, which she also rejected as an option, or break her word to the people. So the stage is set for confrontation after confrontation. This is cynical politics at its worst.

    None of this is lost on the electorate though, and this is where things are different, where things are changing. A growing majority of the voters aren’t being fooled by these games anymore. Instead such maneuverings are making the people fume. This is the slow simmering anger that I spoke of earlier. Lincoln said, “You can fool all of the people some of the time, some of the people all of the time, but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time.” But what Lincoln didn’t say is that those people who realize they have been fooled will get angry. Some of the people will still be fooled by the shenanigans these legislators are pulling now but in increasingly smaller numbers. The game is up.

    So much as it pains me to say this, go ahead. Raise our taxes, make us angry. Rather than cut the endless construction projects, from uprooting Waikiki for the shortsighted inner-city BRT to whatever else you may have in mind, raise our property taxes and make us even angrier. Please, raise the GET and drive grocery prices and everything else through the roof so that we will be certain to remember exactly who did this to us. Feel free to give the TAT receipts to the outlying counties and give Mayor Harris the power to add a city GET to the state tax. Make living in Honolulu next to unaffordable and increase our growing wrath.

    Finally I would like to say to Gov. Lingle, please veto each and every proposal. Please fight for everything you ran on and make them override your every veto. Make it perfectly clear who wants to pick the people’s pockets and who thinks the people have a right to keep their hard earned money. Fight and battle and make it starkly evident just who stands where in this struggle to free this state from the status quo of tax and spend, tax and spend, tax and spend. That way, come next election, we will know exactly upon whom to direct our anger when we enter the ballot box. We should be just livid by then.

    ”’Don Newman is a free-lance writer in Waikiki. He can be reached at:”’ mailto:newmand001@hawaii.rr.com