Monday, April 15, 2024
More
    Home Blog Page 1971

    Big Box Boom is Bad for Hawaii

    0

    I read with great interest and curiosity your article on how unaffected small businesses are on the Big Island by the benevolent Big Box retailers, especially in light of this morning Honolulu Advertisers factually based article referenced below, which gives a truer, darker foreshadowing of the long-term adverse economic impacts these predatory big box retailers have on local economies all over the U.S.

    See:

    https://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2003/Feb/19/ln/ln36a.html

    I suggest you study the numerous examples of how Big Box retailers have literally destroyed small-, medium-, and large-sized businesses elsewhere as well as right here in our front yards in Hawaii. Although the Wal-Marts and Borders etc. are relatively new, the damage to local stores such as Longs and supermarkets is now becoming evident. I have talked to residents in Mililani and the observation expressed is how the Mililani Town Centers’ Longs is now a ghost town. Now if this is how unaffected our businesses are, I hate to see what domino effect these Big Box retailers will have in the foreseeable future.

    How blind can you all be to the reality?

    This means while we are being promised a short-term spurt in property tax payments to our County governments, it’ll mean a long-term steep drop-off of GET payments, income tax payments, and visitor tax revenues, and the real death of small business throughout the state.

    Wake up before it’s too late.

    Political Tittle-tattle: News and Entertainment from Hawaii's Political Arena – Feb. 20, 2003-'War' Breaks Out Prior to Senate Recess; GOP Senators AWOL at Important Confirmation Hearings; Worst Anti-Business Bill Makes Its Way Through Senate; A Different Kind of War Being Fought at Lake Wilson; Second Amendment Rights Advocate Alan Gottlieb Visits; City Jumps the Gun on BRT Approval; Parties Already Recruiting; Commission Hears Complaint; Gov Makes Appointments; Community Turns to Prayer in Wartime; Know Any Amazing Women?

    0

    “Malia Lt blue top Image”

    ”’War’ Breaks Out Prior to Senate Recess”

    Moments before the state Senate was about to adjourn yesterday, and to begin its 5-day mandatory recess period, Sen. Carol Fukunaga, D-Makiki, rose on a point of personal privilege. Fukunaga, who rarely speaks on the Senate floor, said she wanted to give her colleagues and the community a message of “peace” prior to beginning the recess. Instead, she touted the contents of Senate Concurrent Resolution 21, which urges the President of the United States not to “preemptively start a war with Iraq.”

    The resolution, authored by Maui Democrat J. Kalani English, was co-signed by 16 fellow Democrat Senators, but had not yet been scheduled for floor action. The resolution, a highly partisan, one-sided attack on the United States government and President George W. Bush, was the subject of a state House debate a day earlier. Members of the Senate quickly lined up to either defend SCR 21 and its propagandized version of “peace” or to defend the president and America’s military.

    Sen. Minority Leader Fred Hemmings, R-Waimanalo, rose to rebut Fukunaga’s call for a peaceful diplomatic resolution of the Middleastern conflict built upon United Nations and International support. Hemmings told the Senate and visitors in the gallery that the United States already is at war and has been fighting terrorism, and he reminded them that more people were killed in the twin towers on Sept. 11 than at Pearl Harbor. He urged strong support for the president and the U.S. Military.

    A 45-minute debate ensued, and many other Senators espoused their views about the pending war with Iraq. Democrat Sen. Suzanne Chun-Oakland of Nuuanu gave a teary, emotional call for peace, while the resolution’s author, English, told how he stood in solidarity with the 1,000 anti-war demonstrators from Maui.

    Sen. Sam Slom, R-Hawaii Kai, said peace is important, but not peace at any price and that there are worse things than war, such as enslavement and death by dictators like Saddam Hussein. He reminded his colleagues that those in the military desire peace the most, not choosing to be in harms way or to be separated from family and friends. However, these same military personnel accept their responsibility and duty and put their lives on the line for everyone else in America. And now that Hawaii’s military men and women have been called to action, Slom said, the Legislature, at the very least, should show support for them.

    Freshman Kauai Sen. Gary Hooser said he resented Slom’s comments, implying those speaking out for peace yesterday did not support the military, though his support was for a resolution attacking the alleged injustices of this nation and its President.

    Democrat Sen. Rozalyn Baker of Maui startled many by saying “I am a Vietnam veteran” then corrected herself to say she grew up in the Vietnam era. She too spoke of the importance of peace, but chose to attack the United States, while painting Iraq and its dictatorial regime as “victims” in the current situation.

    Minority Floor Leader Bob Hogue, R-Kailua, said he strongly supports the president and urged his colleagues to do the same, saying the president has access to greater information than do members of the Hawaii Legislature.

    Democrat Sen. Cal Kawamoto, one of only two active military veterans in the state Senate (the other being Senate President Robert Bunda) did not sign the Democrat resolution, and chose instead to strongly advocate support for Hawaii’s military, now in harms way.

    The resolution will be debated again in more detail at a later date, but any action by the state Senate will be even less significant if war with Iraq already has begun.

    Immediate reaction from the general public was that this Legislature, which has yet to balance the budget, fix the schools and provide alternative transportation solutions, is way beyond its area of expertise in attempting to influence national and international foreign policy.

    ”GOP Senators AWOL at Important Confirmation Hearings”

    With Gov. Linda Lingle’s 16 cabinet appointees facing Senate confirmation in a Senate with 20 Democrats and 5 Republicans, the appointees need all of the support they can get from a sympathetic public and the Republican Senators who should be supporting them and the first Republican administration in 40 years.

    All of the Senate committees, except Ways and Means, allow only one Republican committee member, usually out of a total of 7 to 9 members. Therefore, that Republican needs to play a pivotal role, especially when the conferees or other administration personnel find themselves in a room dominated by individuals and groups testifying in opposition to the administration’s agenda of change.

    But several Republicans have dropped out of sight during hearings, not even being present when the governor’s bills are heard or her cabinet members come before Senate committees for review.

    For example, Tuesday, in the Senate Judiciary committee hearing of the confirmation of attorney general Mark Bennett and Hawaiian Homes Chair Micah Kane, lone Republican Senate member Bob Hogue did not attend.

    On Wednesday, Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs appointee Mark Recktenwald went before the Senate Commerce and Consumer Protection Committee, and the only Senators to show of the seven member committee were Chair Ron Menor and vice Chair Rozalyn Baker. Republican member Paul Whalen was notably absent.

    In other non-confirmation hearings in both the House and Senate, Republican members have had a less than perfect attendance record when administration spokespeople have come to testify. Case in point was last Saturday’s House hearing where the governor’s Senior Policy Advisor Randy Roth and the governor were the subject of an attack at a House hearing where Roth was testifying, rather than the House Democrats focusing on the subject bills and issues. No Republicans helped defend him.

    There is tremendous irony in the unwillingness of these Republicans to show up, or speak up, at hearings. For so long, the Republicans seemed to accept the fact they were not going to influence the outcome of hearings or the people who testified from the former Democrat administrations. However, they now have strong allies in the governor’s appointees and spokespeople who need their support, but they aren’t there to further their own agenda or that of the governor.

    ”Worst Anti-Business Bill Makes Its Way Through Senate”

    In the Senate Labor Committee, the baddest of the bad bills reemerged from last year’s Legislature. The so called “successor employer bill,” introduced this year as SB 1 by Sen. Brian Kanno, would force any person or organization that buys an existing business to retain at least 50 percent of all existing employees, no questions asked.

    Last year’s bill, dubbed by NFIB’s Hawaii President Bette Tatum as “the worst anti-business bill she’d ever seen,” required a successor employer to retain 100 percent of all former employees. Tatum said this bill was discussed at a national NFIB conference where it won the prize as the worst type of anti-business legislation amongst all the bills from all 50 states.

    While the testimony was overwhelmingly in opposition to this bill by businesses, organizations and the state Department of labor, the ILWU said the bill did not go far enough.

    The bill, as drafted, would only apply to businesses with 100 or more employees. The ILWU suggested two changes: reduce the number of employees to 50 from 100; and require the employer to retain 100 percent of the employees until, with the union’s approval, the company need only retain 50 percent of their employees.

    The examples of mistreatment by successor employers given by the unions in their testimony all involved hotel buyouts extending back to 1986. One former housekeeping employee who formerly worked at one of the affected hotels, sobbed through her testimony and said that she had worked for the hotel for 31 years, and though 66 years of age, had a lot more to offer. The new owners chose not to rehire her, she said, and now it was extremely difficult for her to find work. The former housekeeper later did confide that she received severance benefits and full retirement, but she did not disclose to the committee that she is currently re-employed.

    Senate Committee Member Cal Kawamoto asked the ILWU if the union would support an exemption for the construction industry since it is a special industry with a unique set of labor problems. The union spokesperson readily agreed, but when asked about exemptions for the retailers, manufacturing, and food and beverage industries, he declined to give support.

    With the room full of uncharacteristic opposition to the measure, the bill’s author, who also is the labor committee chairman, decided to defer decision making until Friday at noon, though a quorum was present. Deferring a vote is a typical trick used by legislative chairs who don’t want opposition present when they pass or kill bills, and they hope by making it inconvenient for the public, they will be more likely to pass or kill without an audience.

    ”A Different kind of War Being Fought at Lake Wilson”

    Even Saddam Hussein might be afraid of the puke green, slimy monster now consuming Lake Wilson on Oahu — it grows faster than a speeding bullet, chokes the life out of fish and is stronger than any pretend monster in Star Trek or Star Wars.

    The official name is Salvinia molesta, but it more likely could be categorized as a weapon of mass destruction.

    Once a growth in people’s aquariums, the weed is now the biggest and fastest growing pest the state must deal with.

    Apparently some bright people dumped their aquariums into the lake, despite all the warnings of fish and wildlife experts who say never, never do that. The weed liked all the sewage it found to grow off of in the once vibrant, sparkling lake, that now is a dumping ground for treated (sometimes raw) sewage.

    Now the monster is taking over the entire lake and all the life in it. Only television coverage can do justice in showing off this terror.

    The Lake Wilson State Recreation Area has been closed until further notice as one lonely guy hired by the city attempts to use his heavy machinery to remove the weed from the water. He is backed up by city personnel who continue to load up their dump trucks and take the weed to an area where it will be recycled into fertilizer.

    Only problem is any headway they make in digging up the weed, is gone by the next day as the weed doubles the area it consumes every day.

    How about that Weapon of Mass Destruction Saddam?

    ”Second Amendment Rights Advocate Alan Gottlieb Visits”

    The Second Amendment Foundation and Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms Founder Alan M. Gottlieb of Bellevue, WA, one of the nation’s leading proponents of second amendment gun rights, is visiting Hawaii with his family.

    That did not stop the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii President Richard Rowland from arranging a luncheon speaking engagement with Gottlieb and local second amendment rights supporters this Friday at the Pacific Club.

    Gottlieb, the author of several books on gun rights, is a popular radio and television talk show guest and is interviewed frequently on second amendment issues by the major national media.

    ”City Jumps the Gun on BRT Approval”

    In the midst of the city administration’s gung ho plans for the in town portion of the $1 billion Bus Rapid Transit system, there appears a glitch.

    Michelle Matson, a community activist who is a member of an opposition group closely monitoring the BRT’s progress, and the Chair of the Planning, Land Use and Transportation Committee for the Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis Heights Neighborhood Board, says there is a question of non-compliance by the City Administration with

    Political Tittle-tattle: News and Entertainment from Hawaii’s Political Arena – Feb. 20, 2003-‘War’ Breaks Out Prior to Senate Recess; GOP Senators AWOL at Important Confirmation Hearings; Worst Anti-Business Bill Makes Its Way Through Senate; A Different Kind of War Being Fought at Lake Wilson; Second Amendment Rights Advocate Alan Gottlieb Visits; City Jumps the Gun on BRT Approval; Parties Already Recruiting; Commission Hears Complaint; Gov Makes Appointments; Community Turns to Prayer in Wartime; Know Any Amazing Women?

    0

    “Malia Lt blue top Image”

    ”’War’ Breaks Out Prior to Senate Recess”

    Moments before the state Senate was about to adjourn yesterday, and to begin its 5-day mandatory recess period, Sen. Carol Fukunaga, D-Makiki, rose on a point of personal privilege. Fukunaga, who rarely speaks on the Senate floor, said she wanted to give her colleagues and the community a message of “peace” prior to beginning the recess. Instead, she touted the contents of Senate Concurrent Resolution 21, which urges the President of the United States not to “preemptively start a war with Iraq.”

    The resolution, authored by Maui Democrat J. Kalani English, was co-signed by 16 fellow Democrat Senators, but had not yet been scheduled for floor action. The resolution, a highly partisan, one-sided attack on the United States government and President George W. Bush, was the subject of a state House debate a day earlier. Members of the Senate quickly lined up to either defend SCR 21 and its propagandized version of “peace” or to defend the president and America’s military.

    Sen. Minority Leader Fred Hemmings, R-Waimanalo, rose to rebut Fukunaga’s call for a peaceful diplomatic resolution of the Middleastern conflict built upon United Nations and International support. Hemmings told the Senate and visitors in the gallery that the United States already is at war and has been fighting terrorism, and he reminded them that more people were killed in the twin towers on Sept. 11 than at Pearl Harbor. He urged strong support for the president and the U.S. Military.

    A 45-minute debate ensued, and many other Senators espoused their views about the pending war with Iraq. Democrat Sen. Suzanne Chun-Oakland of Nuuanu gave a teary, emotional call for peace, while the resolution’s author, English, told how he stood in solidarity with the 1,000 anti-war demonstrators from Maui.

    Sen. Sam Slom, R-Hawaii Kai, said peace is important, but not peace at any price and that there are worse things than war, such as enslavement and death by dictators like Saddam Hussein. He reminded his colleagues that those in the military desire peace the most, not choosing to be in harms way or to be separated from family and friends. However, these same military personnel accept their responsibility and duty and put their lives on the line for everyone else in America. And now that Hawaii’s military men and women have been called to action, Slom said, the Legislature, at the very least, should show support for them.

    Freshman Kauai Sen. Gary Hooser said he resented Slom’s comments, implying those speaking out for peace yesterday did not support the military, though his support was for a resolution attacking the alleged injustices of this nation and its President.

    Democrat Sen. Rozalyn Baker of Maui startled many by saying “I am a Vietnam veteran” then corrected herself to say she grew up in the Vietnam era. She too spoke of the importance of peace, but chose to attack the United States, while painting Iraq and its dictatorial regime as “victims” in the current situation.

    Minority Floor Leader Bob Hogue, R-Kailua, said he strongly supports the president and urged his colleagues to do the same, saying the president has access to greater information than do members of the Hawaii Legislature.

    Democrat Sen. Cal Kawamoto, one of only two active military veterans in the state Senate (the other being Senate President Robert Bunda) did not sign the Democrat resolution, and chose instead to strongly advocate support for Hawaii’s military, now in harms way.

    The resolution will be debated again in more detail at a later date, but any action by the state Senate will be even less significant if war with Iraq already has begun.

    Immediate reaction from the general public was that this Legislature, which has yet to balance the budget, fix the schools and provide alternative transportation solutions, is way beyond its area of expertise in attempting to influence national and international foreign policy.

    ”GOP Senators AWOL at Important Confirmation Hearings”

    With Gov. Linda Lingle’s 16 cabinet appointees facing Senate confirmation in a Senate with 20 Democrats and 5 Republicans, the appointees need all of the support they can get from a sympathetic public and the Republican Senators who should be supporting them and the first Republican administration in 40 years.

    All of the Senate committees, except Ways and Means, allow only one Republican committee member, usually out of a total of 7 to 9 members. Therefore, that Republican needs to play a pivotal role, especially when the conferees or other administration personnel find themselves in a room dominated by individuals and groups testifying in opposition to the administration’s agenda of change.

    But several Republicans have dropped out of sight during hearings, not even being present when the governor’s bills are heard or her cabinet members come before Senate committees for review.

    For example, Tuesday, in the Senate Judiciary committee hearing of the confirmation of attorney general Mark Bennett and Hawaiian Homes Chair Micah Kane, lone Republican Senate member Bob Hogue did not attend.

    On Wednesday, Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs appointee Mark Recktenwald went before the Senate Commerce and Consumer Protection Committee, and the only Senators to show of the seven member committee were Chair Ron Menor and vice Chair Rozalyn Baker. Republican member Paul Whalen was notably absent.

    In other non-confirmation hearings in both the House and Senate, Republican members have had a less than perfect attendance record when administration spokespeople have come to testify. Case in point was last Saturday’s House hearing where the governor’s Senior Policy Advisor Randy Roth and the governor were the subject of an attack at a House hearing where Roth was testifying, rather than the House Democrats focusing on the subject bills and issues. No Republicans helped defend him.

    There is tremendous irony in the unwillingness of these Republicans to show up, or speak up, at hearings. For so long, the Republicans seemed to accept the fact they were not going to influence the outcome of hearings or the people who testified from the former Democrat administrations. However, they now have strong allies in the governor’s appointees and spokespeople who need their support, but they aren’t there to further their own agenda or that of the governor.

    ”Worst Anti-Business Bill Makes Its Way Through Senate”

    In the Senate Labor Committee, the baddest of the bad bills reemerged from last year’s Legislature. The so called “successor employer bill,” introduced this year as SB 1 by Sen. Brian Kanno, would force any person or organization that buys an existing business to retain at least 50 percent of all existing employees, no questions asked.

    Last year’s bill, dubbed by NFIB’s Hawaii President Bette Tatum as “the worst anti-business bill she’d ever seen,” required a successor employer to retain 100 percent of all former employees. Tatum said this bill was discussed at a national NFIB conference where it won the prize as the worst type of anti-business legislation amongst all the bills from all 50 states.

    While the testimony was overwhelmingly in opposition to this bill by businesses, organizations and the state Department of labor, the ILWU said the bill did not go far enough.

    The bill, as drafted, would only apply to businesses with 100 or more employees. The ILWU suggested two changes: reduce the number of employees to 50 from 100; and require the employer to retain 100 percent of the employees until, with the union’s approval, the company need only retain 50 percent of their employees.

    The examples of mistreatment by successor employers given by the unions in their testimony all involved hotel buyouts extending back to 1986. One former housekeeping employee who formerly worked at one of the affected hotels, sobbed through her testimony and said that she had worked for the hotel for 31 years, and though 66 years of age, had a lot more to offer. The new owners chose not to rehire her, she said, and now it was extremely difficult for her to find work. The former housekeeper later did confide that she received severance benefits and full retirement, but she did not disclose to the committee that she is currently re-employed.

    Senate Committee Member Cal Kawamoto asked the ILWU if the union would support an exemption for the construction industry since it is a special industry with a unique set of labor problems. The union spokesperson readily agreed, but when asked about exemptions for the retailers, manufacturing, and food and beverage industries, he declined to give support.

    With the room full of uncharacteristic opposition to the measure, the bill’s author, who also is the labor committee chairman, decided to defer decision making until Friday at noon, though a quorum was present. Deferring a vote is a typical trick used by legislative chairs who don’t want opposition present when they pass or kill bills, and they hope by making it inconvenient for the public, they will be more likely to pass or kill without an audience.

    ”A Different kind of War Being Fought at Lake Wilson”

    Even Saddam Hussein might be afraid of the puke green, slimy monster now consuming Lake Wilson on Oahu — it grows faster than a speeding bullet, chokes the life out of fish and is stronger than any pretend monster in Star Trek or Star Wars.

    The official name is Salvinia molesta, but it more likely could be categorized as a weapon of mass destruction.

    Once a growth in people’s aquariums, the weed is now the biggest and fastest growing pest the state must deal with.

    Apparently some bright people dumped their aquariums into the lake, despite all the warnings of fish and wildlife experts who say never, never do that. The weed liked all the sewage it found to grow off of in the once vibrant, sparkling lake, that now is a dumping ground for treated (sometimes raw) sewage.

    Now the monster is taking over the entire lake and all the life in it. Only television coverage can do justice in showing off this terror.

    The Lake Wilson State Recreation Area has been closed until further notice as one lonely guy hired by the city attempts to use his heavy machinery to remove the weed from the water. He is backed up by city personnel who continue to load up their dump trucks and take the weed to an area where it will be recycled into fertilizer.

    Only problem is any headway they make in digging up the weed, is gone by the next day as the weed doubles the area it consumes every day.

    How about that Weapon of Mass Destruction Saddam?

    ”Second Amendment Rights Advocate Alan Gottlieb Visits”

    The Second Amendment Foundation and Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms Founder Alan M. Gottlieb of Bellevue, WA, one of the nation’s leading proponents of second amendment gun rights, is visiting Hawaii with his family.

    That did not stop the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii President Richard Rowland from arranging a luncheon speaking engagement with Gottlieb and local second amendment rights supporters this Friday at the Pacific Club.

    Gottlieb, the author of several books on gun rights, is a popular radio and television talk show guest and is interviewed frequently on second amendment issues by the major national media.

    ”City Jumps the Gun on BRT Approval”

    In the midst of the city administration’s gung ho plans for the in town portion of the $1 billion Bus Rapid Transit system, there appears a glitch.

    Michelle Matson, a community activist who is a member of an opposition group closely monitoring the BRT’s progress, and the Chair of the Planning, Land Use and Transportation Committee for the Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis Heights Neighborhood Board, says there is a question of non-compliance by the City Administration with

    Senate Democrats Should Stick to Voting on Local Issues-Democrats, with Exception of Sen. Cal Kawamoto, Debate War With Iraq, Ignore Problems Proliferating Around Them

    Once again Hawaii’s Democrats proved that perceived political oneupsmanship takes precedence over doing the people’s business. The only drawback for them is just how transparent this effort is. There is absolutely no reason for the Democrats in the Hawaii State Senate to concern themselves with whether or not our president should await United Nations’ approval before protecting the interests of this nation. Especially with all of the problems Hawaii residents are facing locally. But that is exactly what they did yesterday during their floor session. After a 45-minute debate started by Sen. Carol Fukunaga, D-Makiki, 17 Democrats voted to support a Senate resolution that demands President George W. Bush await approval from United Nations before attacking Iraq. The five Senate Republicans, and Sen. Cal Kawamoto, D-Waipahu, a former fighter pilot, spoke in favor of military action in Iraq and supported the president.

    None of the Democrats acknowledge dealing with this issue is the president’s job — the job he was elected to do — to protect this nation in whatever manner he deems best, regardless of what the United Nations may say. The job of local legislators, on the other hand, is to deal with local interests, not to arrogantly insert themselves into national issues for possible political gain, the only reason they could possibly be doing so in this case. The nominal reason for why the Senate Democrats say they are expressing opposition to President George W. Bush (which what this in fact was, opposition to the president) is the effect the war would have upon Hawaii’s economy.

    But have our legislators so quickly forgotten the effect the 9/11 terrorist attack on Hawaii’s economy? What if such an event, on any scale, were actually repeated in America? What would be the effect upon Hawaii’s economy then? Suppose for a moment that President Bush is right and Saddam Hussein actually does possess weapons of mass destruction, and Saddam does have connections to Al Qaeda terrorist who can assist in delivering one of those weapons to an American city. Which do you suppose would do greater damage to Hawaii’s economy, a war against Iraq or another terrorist attack? What is the price for failing to act in that case? The fallacy of the argument will be revealed when the United Nations finally does give its approval for a war, which it must or it will lose all credibility as an international institution, the one thing it cannot allow to happen.

    Will a war that has United Nations’ approval be any less damaging to Hawaii’s economy than one that lacks United Nations’ approval?

    This is the fallacy the Democrats fail to understand — the effect will be the same in either case, so why oppose the war now? The answer is clear — because they aren’t opposing war, they are opposing a Republican president for purely political reasons. This goes back to why this abdication of the people’s business that the Democratic Senators indulged in was so offensive and wrong. It was an attempt for political gain at the expense of the people of Hawaii whom they are supposed to represent.

    It is political posturing on the people’s dime. It is the exact opposite of what their responsibilities are supposed to be.

    Whether they have a resolution opposing the war or not will not benefit Hawaii one way or the other.

    Sooner or later there will either be war, or another terrorist attack. The only question is which will be worse for our nation, and for Hawaii. From the president’s point of view there is only one answer to that question.

    He is right, of course, and Hawaii’s Democratic Senators are wrong.

    ”’Don Newman is a free-lance writer living in Waikiki and can be reached via email at:”’ mailto:newmand001@hawaii.rr.com

    Disputing the Positive Impact of the City's Transportation Plan-Majority of the Public Still Not Sold on the City's $1 Billion Proposal for Light Rail

    A majority of citizens seem to fully support implementation of the West Oahu transportation plan as described in the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Final Environmental Impact Statement.

    However, there is strong opposition, growing stronger every day, against the in-town portion of the BRT. Many foresee it adversely and intrusively impacting urban Honolulu

    Disputing the Positive Impact of the City’s Transportation Plan-Majority of the Public Still Not Sold on the City’s $1 Billion Proposal for Light Rail

    A majority of citizens seem to fully support implementation of the West Oahu transportation plan as described in the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Final Environmental Impact Statement.

    However, there is strong opposition, growing stronger every day, against the in-town portion of the BRT. Many foresee it adversely and intrusively impacting urban Honolulu

    Open Letter to All Hawaii State Legislators-Teaching Legislators Real-World Accountability

    “Dick Rowland Image”

    Fully aware that this idea is too late for the 2003 legislative session, it nonetheless is forwarded for your consideration and planning for the 2004 session.

    Here it is.

    ”Background:”

    You mentioned in a talk last week that the Legislature had passed one bill so far, which was to authorize the expenditure of $20,800,000 to support the operations of the legislature for 2003-4. With 76 in the Legislature divided into the $20,800,000 one gets $273,684 for each legislator for the two years. Divided by 24, one gets a cost per legislator per month of $11,416.66.

    Currently, legislators are assigned their offices and allowed staff and other expenses at no out-of-pocket costs. They do not have to deal with accounting, hiring, payroll taxes, advisor fees, office space expenses, office supplies etc. But they deal with policy on those matters all the time.

    ”Proposal:”

    Eliminate all pay, benefits, all employees, office space and office equipment and supplies for legislators and their support. That includes the Legislative and Minority/Majority Research Offices and all other “free” support offices.

    Then provide an allowance to each legislator of $11,416.66 per month for his or her term of office. With that allowance each legislator will rent appropriate space (from the state or elsewhere), hire employees and pay all relevant benefits (including their own), pay for office supplies, etc. Also, for the research and design of proposed bills, the legislators involved will be free to select and pay the researchers & bill development offices in or out of government. Further, special allowances for leaders like the President of the Senate and Speaker of the House will be paid into a special fund for the support of these leaders. The same will be true of other support (Sgt at Arms, clerk of the Senate, etc.).

    If the legislator fails to pay for services, he or she will be handled in default as a business would be handled. If services are provided from any source for free or below market rates, the legislator will be required to reveal such. For example if the Teamster Union provided a legislator with a Xerox machine, such would be made public knowledge. Borrowing against future cash flow would be allowed with similar disclosure. The Legislative Auditor or other qualified auditors will audit each legislator’s accounts each year (January) and report results to the press and to the legislative leadership. The legislators will pay a negotiated fee for this service.

    The per-session allowance adjustment would be pegged at one-half of 1 percent below inflation or deflation and could be otherwise changed only by recommendation of a commission (carefully designed to avoid self-dealing), a 75 percent vote of the Legislature and signature of the governor.

    ”Result:”

    Each legislator would become a semi-business person. Understanding of the difficulties faced by entrepreneurs and small family businesses would be enhanced. Some legislators, if they were poor managers, would get no pay. Others would fail to act responsibly and pocket much of the allowance. The audit would reveal such. Severe penalties for malfeasance should be specified and who would be held accountable for enforcement should be identified.

    ”Prediction:”

    If the above was proposed and taken seriously, we would “discover” all sorts of costs for running the Legislature that had never been revealed before. It might be appropriate to increase the allowance to, say, $15,000 each month. But once the above went into effect, legislators will complain that they are so very busy running their business (to them, wasting time) that they have little time to consider legislation. That would be a good thing because:

    *Much frivolous legislation would never be proposed (too expensive personally);

    *Understanding of legislative impact (unintended consequences) would be raised;

    *Legislators would become, by and large, more thoughtful and careful in legislative activities; and

    *Less “career” politicians would run for office (less benefits, more accountability).

    ”’Richard O. Rowland is the president of the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii. He can be reached via email at:”’ mailto:grassroot@hawaii.rr.com

    Yes to Tax Credits for All Emerging Industries in Act 221

    In the Jan. 26, 2002 issue of The Honolulu Advertiser, (see https://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2003/Jan/26/op/op08a.html) Tareq Hoque, recent chair of the Hawaii Technology Trade Association (HTTA), discussed a progressive local tax incentive known as Act 221. Its purpose is to help emerging industries in Hawaii find investors.

    Hoque at first sounds quite happy about this law, calling it fabulous, and has HTTA take credit for “work[ing] hard with our legislators to get it passed,” but then he spends the rest of his op-ed complaining about it, saying the film industry has exploited the bill.

    So Hoque is glad that Act 221 exists, but is upset that the movie industry also receives this tax credit when filming in Hawaii. He says this is detrimental to our state’s residents, repeating that the credit comes at the considerable expense of Hawaii’s taxpayers. His solution: For the state Department of Taxation to revamp the law so that only tech companies can benefit from the tax credit. I do not think this is a very intelligent strategy, since I worked for three rather high profile high-tech startup companies and 2/3 of them are not around anymore, not to mention the countless high-tech companies in Hawaii I’ve seen go down in recent years. The odds just aren’t very good. We should not be putting all our economic eggs in the tech basket.

    Hoque also takes issue with “Blue Crush,” implying that the producers came in, took their tax credits and left, somehow exploiting the state. Au contraire — “Blue Crush” director John Stockwell liked it here so much that despite all the bad press his picture received in Hawaii, he stayed and brought his current project here as well. If bringing in and retaining outside expertise isn’t a necessary thing in building an industry from scratch, I don’t know what is.

    I am both a longtime member of the technology industry and someone just beginning in the film production business. I am also very concerned about our economy and have been for the past decade or so. Having seen both industries up close and personal, I strongly disagree with Hoque’s very one-sided view. When movie companies receive the tax credit, they don’t really cost private citizens anything. When the film project “The Big Bounce” got a $50 million tax credit, it didn’t steal $50 million from anyone. Its investors got a tax credit as an added incentive to invest in producing a piece of intellectual property — the common bond of all industries covered in Act 221. All emerging industries in Hawaii which 221 is trying to stimulate (biotech, ocean sciences, astronomy, optic sensors, nonfossil fuel energy, software and performing arts products) all produce intellectual property. The big picture and overall goal is a concerted effort to shift towards a knowledge-based economy and intellectual property is its foundation. Perhaps some of the wording in the act needs to change; a more accurate description of a QHTB (Qualified High Tech Business aka a company which qualifies for the tax credits) might be Qualified Targeted Industry Business.

    As many lawmakers point out, like State House Economic Development Committee Chair Rep. Brian Schatz says, Act 221 should in fact be expanded to benefit even more industries. “We want to provide clarity and predictability for investors … so we don’t want to change the law at all,” Schatz says in a Dec. 20, 2002, article in Pacific Business News. Innovation needs to be encouraged in Hawaii as much as possible, and Act 221 does just that.

    What confuses me about Hoque’s commentary is his very obviously contradictory message. On HTTA’s own Web site, they say “with the help of our lawmakers, HTTA created and continues to protect Act 221 …. HTTA’s position is and continues to be no changes to Act 221.” It seems to me that Hoque is quite in favor of big changes to Act 221 — that was the whole point of his article, wasn’t it? Also, in a Dec. 20 article in Pacific Business News, Ann Chung, HTTA’s executive director, says “As far as we understand, nothing is going forward [regarding changes to Act 221]. From our standpoint we would like no changes for Act 221.” If that is the case, I’m wondering why Mr. Hoque bothered to submit his article at all.

    The big picture for Act 221 is the business creation and economic development in Hawaii it encourages, ”’period”’ The benefits from the tax credits aren’t just the returns on successful high-tech companies (and there are few to point to), but a diversified economy. If Hawaii can create burgeoning industries besides that of tourism, more of our best and brightest will be able to stay at home.

    Hawaii’s economy is in the dumps, and we need to act fast to fix it. Whatever industry gets the steroid is fine by me. If a cost-benefit analysis needs to be done regarding some so-called abuses of Act 221, fine — but now is ”’not”’ the time. We cannot make up the rules up as we go along. We should allow the law to work as written until its sunset date in two years, and ”’then”’ look at its long-term effects (after the long term is actually up) and make changes as needed. We need Act 221 for our financial survival, and we need it as it is currently written.

    ”’Stacey Hayashi worked as a software engineer at three Hawaii high-tech startups from 1998 to 2002: Digital Island, WorldPoint, and 4charity.com and was on the founding team of the E-List, a techie/business networking group. She is currently co-owner and co founder of DVD Shop Hawaii and owns and operates several successful e-commerce businesses. She is now trying to find financing for the production of an independent motion picture drama about the Americans of Japanese Ancestry who fought in World War II. She can be reached at:”’ mailto:stacey@442movie.com

    The False Promise of Hydrogen-What the President's Driving At

    0

    In his State of the Union address, George W. Bush proposed that the federal government spend $1.2 billion on hydrogen fuel-cell research. “With a new national commitment, our scientists and engineers will overcome obstacles to taking these cars from laboratory to showroom, so that the first car driven by a child born today could be powered by hydrogen, and pollution-free,” Bush said. “Join me in this important innovation, to make our air significantly cleaner and our country much less dependent on foreign sources of oil.”

    Bush obviously feels significant pressure to appear that he’s doing something about the environment. At some point it might dawn on him that there’s nothing he can say or do that will satisfy the radical environmental lobby and their media lapdogs. Bringing up such issues in high-profile speeches, such as the State of the Union, only provides fodder to his political enemies. Predictably the eco-radicals attacked Bush’s plan for not requiring automakers to put affordable hydrogen cars on the market by a certain model year. They also claim that the plan is just a way to avoid forcing the automobile companies to lower fuel-economy standards.

    It makes even less sense, however, for President Bush to throw a lot of money at a technology that is decades away from commercial viability. The “hydrogen economy” has been promoted for years by environmental activists and alternative-energy gurus like Amory Lovins. But hydrogen is not a source of energy, something which hydrogen advocates either don’t understand or refuse to acknowledge. Since hydrogen does not exist in geological reservoirs it must be extracted from fossil-fuel feedstocks or water. The process of extracting hydrogen uses energy, which means that using hydrogen is less efficient that burning fossil fuels. And if you’re worried about global warming you certainly don’t want to go that route. As a recent energy-technology review in Science magazine pointed out last November, “Per unit of heat generated, more CO2 is produced by making H2 [hydrogen] from fossil fuel than by burning the fossil fuel directly.”

    The other option is to extract hydrogen from water using renewable-energy sources that deal fossil fuels entirely out of the equation. But that is a pipedream. Renewable energy itself is not cost effective, and by the time you use the energy to extract hydrogen from water, transport that hydrogen to where car owners can get to it and then recombine it with oxygen to re-extract the energy the cost becomes astronomical.

    Honda, for example, is leasing five of its FCX fuel-cell vehicles to the city of Los Angeles. It is clearly a PR ploy since the cost to the company for each car is $1.6 million. Honda has also constructed a bank of solar panels in Torrance, California for the purpose of generating “clean” electricity to produce the hydrogen. But it takes a whole week to generate enough power to produce one tank of hydrogen at a cost of $40,000 per tank. Call me crazy, but that’s a long way from affordable transportation.

    Renewable energy has its own significant drawbacks. Wind power, the only renewable energy even close to being competitive, requires enormous subsidies to stay afloat. Subsidies for wind power, which include an array of both federal and state tax breaks and credits, along with accelerated depreciation (five years as opposed to 20 years for other electric generating facilities), are so extensive that their value sometimes exceeds the wind farm’s revenues from selling electricity.

    One of the subsidies, a 1.7-cent-per-kilowatt-hour production tax credit that must be renewed periodically by Congress, throws the industry into a recession every time it lapses. In 1999, for example, the tax credit wasn’t available and only 50 megawatts of wind generation were installed. Congress renewed the tax credit and new generations soared to 1700 MW. In December 2001, the credit lapsed once again and wasn’t renewed until March 2002. That year, only 410 MW of new capacity were installed. An energy source that is so heavily dependent on taxpayer subsidies does not meet President Bush’s stated goal of providing this nation with affordable and reliable energy.

    Moreover, wind farms are incredibly land intensive. Three newly proposed wind farms in West Virginia would occupy 30 to 40 square miles but would produce slightly less electricity than a new 265 MW gas-fired combined-cycle generating plant, which would occupy a few acres. Sallie Baliunas at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, estimates, using very conservative assumptions, that producing enough hydrogen with wind power to replace just one-third of the vehicles on the road today would require 210,000 square miles. In reality, that number would likely be much higher.

    Finally, the history of federal funding of energy-technology research is downright depressing. It is a landscape littered with dozens of multibillion-dollar failures. It is unlikely that this new endeavor will result in anything more than wasted money.

    ”’Paul Georgia is an environmental-policy analyst with the Competitive Enterprise Institute and managing editor of the global-warming newsletter “Cooler Heads.” He can be reached via email at:”’ mailto:pgeorgia@cei.org

    The False Promise of Hydrogen-What the President’s Driving At

    0

    In his State of the Union address, George W. Bush proposed that the federal government spend $1.2 billion on hydrogen fuel-cell research. “With a new national commitment, our scientists and engineers will overcome obstacles to taking these cars from laboratory to showroom, so that the first car driven by a child born today could be powered by hydrogen, and pollution-free,” Bush said. “Join me in this important innovation, to make our air significantly cleaner and our country much less dependent on foreign sources of oil.”

    Bush obviously feels significant pressure to appear that he’s doing something about the environment. At some point it might dawn on him that there’s nothing he can say or do that will satisfy the radical environmental lobby and their media lapdogs. Bringing up such issues in high-profile speeches, such as the State of the Union, only provides fodder to his political enemies. Predictably the eco-radicals attacked Bush’s plan for not requiring automakers to put affordable hydrogen cars on the market by a certain model year. They also claim that the plan is just a way to avoid forcing the automobile companies to lower fuel-economy standards.

    It makes even less sense, however, for President Bush to throw a lot of money at a technology that is decades away from commercial viability. The “hydrogen economy” has been promoted for years by environmental activists and alternative-energy gurus like Amory Lovins. But hydrogen is not a source of energy, something which hydrogen advocates either don’t understand or refuse to acknowledge. Since hydrogen does not exist in geological reservoirs it must be extracted from fossil-fuel feedstocks or water. The process of extracting hydrogen uses energy, which means that using hydrogen is less efficient that burning fossil fuels. And if you’re worried about global warming you certainly don’t want to go that route. As a recent energy-technology review in Science magazine pointed out last November, “Per unit of heat generated, more CO2 is produced by making H2 [hydrogen] from fossil fuel than by burning the fossil fuel directly.”

    The other option is to extract hydrogen from water using renewable-energy sources that deal fossil fuels entirely out of the equation. But that is a pipedream. Renewable energy itself is not cost effective, and by the time you use the energy to extract hydrogen from water, transport that hydrogen to where car owners can get to it and then recombine it with oxygen to re-extract the energy the cost becomes astronomical.

    Honda, for example, is leasing five of its FCX fuel-cell vehicles to the city of Los Angeles. It is clearly a PR ploy since the cost to the company for each car is $1.6 million. Honda has also constructed a bank of solar panels in Torrance, California for the purpose of generating “clean” electricity to produce the hydrogen. But it takes a whole week to generate enough power to produce one tank of hydrogen at a cost of $40,000 per tank. Call me crazy, but that’s a long way from affordable transportation.

    Renewable energy has its own significant drawbacks. Wind power, the only renewable energy even close to being competitive, requires enormous subsidies to stay afloat. Subsidies for wind power, which include an array of both federal and state tax breaks and credits, along with accelerated depreciation (five years as opposed to 20 years for other electric generating facilities), are so extensive that their value sometimes exceeds the wind farm’s revenues from selling electricity.

    One of the subsidies, a 1.7-cent-per-kilowatt-hour production tax credit that must be renewed periodically by Congress, throws the industry into a recession every time it lapses. In 1999, for example, the tax credit wasn’t available and only 50 megawatts of wind generation were installed. Congress renewed the tax credit and new generations soared to 1700 MW. In December 2001, the credit lapsed once again and wasn’t renewed until March 2002. That year, only 410 MW of new capacity were installed. An energy source that is so heavily dependent on taxpayer subsidies does not meet President Bush’s stated goal of providing this nation with affordable and reliable energy.

    Moreover, wind farms are incredibly land intensive. Three newly proposed wind farms in West Virginia would occupy 30 to 40 square miles but would produce slightly less electricity than a new 265 MW gas-fired combined-cycle generating plant, which would occupy a few acres. Sallie Baliunas at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, estimates, using very conservative assumptions, that producing enough hydrogen with wind power to replace just one-third of the vehicles on the road today would require 210,000 square miles. In reality, that number would likely be much higher.

    Finally, the history of federal funding of energy-technology research is downright depressing. It is a landscape littered with dozens of multibillion-dollar failures. It is unlikely that this new endeavor will result in anything more than wasted money.

    ”’Paul Georgia is an environmental-policy analyst with the Competitive Enterprise Institute and managing editor of the global-warming newsletter “Cooler Heads.” He can be reached via email at:”’ mailto:pgeorgia@cei.org