Going Over The Cliff Will Mean Tax Increases

By
Lowell Kalapa
-
6
2239
article top

By Lowell L. Kalapa – Now that everyone is talking about the fiscal cliff that looms as the new year approaches, some are asking what sort of changes will occur on the tax landscape.

For those who can barely recall what happened yesterday, trying to remember what the federal tax law looked like more than a decade ago is impossible. We all have become accustomed to the lower tax rates and so-called “loopholes” that were created under the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) and the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 (JGTRRA), more commonly known as the Bush tax cuts, that it is difficult to imagine that tax rates could actually have been higher in the past twelve years.<

inline

So let’s take a look at what could happen if Congress does nothing between now and when the bells toll in the new year of 2013. Again, much of the following could change as a result of Congressional action in the next few weeks, but this is just to give the reader an idea of what it was like before those Bush tax cuts. The change that would affect all taxpayers is that income tax rates would rise. Currently the bottom rate is set at 10% rising to a maximum income tax rate of 35%. Come January 1, 2013, the bottom rate would revert to 15% while the top rate on the wealthiest taxpayers would rise to 39.6%.

Taxpayers who are currently paying a 25% rate would see that rate revert to 28% while those who currently pay 29% would see their income taxed at 31% and those currently paying a 33% rate would see their tax rate rise to 36%. On one side, there are those who would like to retain the current rate structure while others, including the President, would like to see the top two brackets return to their pre-Bush levels of 35% and 39.6%. These two tax rates would apply to individuals making $200,000 and for couples making $250,000. Politically no side wants to offend the so call “middle-class.”

Another provision would resurrect the 20% tax rate on long-term capital gains up from the current 15%, and for high-income individuals a tax of 3.8% would also be imposed, making the over all maximum tax rate on capital gains 23.8%. This latter surcharge, if you will, is as a result of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) otherwise known as “Obamacare.” The President’s position on this issue is to retain the current 15% for individuals making $200,000 and for couples making $250,000. Again, no one wants to stick their neck out and put their finger in the hornet’s nest of “middle-income” families.

Meanwhile dividend income, which has also enjoyed a 15% preferential rate for the last ten years, will see the return to ordinary income tax rates. Like long-term capital gains, dividend income will also be subject to the 3.8% tax rate for “Obamacare” applying to high-income individuals resulting in an over all tax rate on qualified dividends rising from the current 15% rate to as much as 43.4%. Again, the President’s proposals would retain the lower 15% for dividend income for those under the$200,000/$250,000 threshold.

The phase-out of the personal exemption and the limitation on itemized deductions would be reinstated for certain high-income taxpayers. The President again is recommending that the threshold be set at $200,000 for individuals and $250,000 for couples. The limitation on the itemized deductions had been phased out at the end of 2009 and for the three-year period from 2010 to the end of 2012, there was no limit.

The “marriage penalty” that had been repealed for the last ten years will be reinstated. Between the year 2003 and the end of this year, joint filers were allowed a standard deduction equal to twice the amount allowed a single taxpayer. Beginning with 2013, the standard deduction for couples will drop back to being 167% of the deduction allowed single taxpayers.

The refundable tax credit for childcare will drop from its current $1,000 to $500 and will no longer be a refundable tax credit so taxpayers will not get a refund check should the amount of the credit exceed the taxpayer’s liability.

Finally, the biggest unknown will be the federal estate tax or death tax. Should nothing be done by Congress, the estate tax exclusion will drop from the current $5 million to the pre-Bush level of $1 million and rates could go back to a high of 55% from the current maximum tax rate of 35%. While many doubt it will revert to the previous levels, that again will depend on whether Congress can reach a compromise.

Comments

comments

bottom

6 COMMENTS

  5. If we had been paying those taxes for the past 10 years, we likely wouldn't be where we are today: in debt to the world with a broken down and decaying infrastructure everywhere you look. If we go over the cliff a lot of our debt problems start going away almost immediately indicating to me at least that it was wrong headed to have cut them to begin with. No one want higher taxes, but everyone wants the good things that get paid for by those taxes. The fallacy of the Republican mantra is that cutting taxes makes us all somehow better off. Ten years into following that lie the only ones better off are the rich. The rest of us have not seen a raise in pay that reflects the increased productivity of our workforce even though corporate profits derived from that productivity have been growing. That money is sitting on corporate ledgers and the balance is growing every day. Most of us are earning less, adjusted for inflation, than our parents were in the '70's and the divide between rich and poor grows while the middle class evaporates. With no middle class to drive growth from consumption, businesses stagnate and stop hiring. To maintain their profits and keep shareholders happy, they either cut the workforce, hold back on pay raises, or close local production and move off shore. It's a sad spiral that looks to end badly. Why not take the leap now in a single bound than tumble slowly down a long unending staircase?

Comments are closed.