Mere days after being sworn in, Djou joined four of his GOP colleagues in voting to jump-start the repeal process. In a recent interview with ThinkProgress, Djou went a lot bolder:
THINK PROGRESS: A lot of people are saying that some servicemembers may not defend their comrades if they know they’re gay, or that troops may not accept a change of allowing gay members to serve openly. Do you find this to be true based on your experience?
DJOU: No. No. You know, I think, having been in the service, and I understand that the troops have their own viewpoint on things, which might not nececarily be 100% an exactly reflection of what the average American electorate is, but by and large I have found that with the United States military, and service — members of the service who I have served with, when the civilian officials, the President or the Congress, give an order, a directive, it’s followed, and it’s followed to a tee. That’s what you’re expected to do. And if you can’t do that, then you shouldn’t be in the service and you shouldn’t be wearing the uniform. It’s as simple as that.
Djou’s colleagues are of a different mind on the matter. Where Djou places the burden of obeying direct orders squarely on the soldiers, holding those who would not do their jobs out for contempt, people like Senator James Inhofe (R-Okla.) say that soldiers could not be faulted if “gay panic” led them to disregard orders.
See the full report: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/16/charles-djou-hawaii-congr_n_614862.html