BY COUNCIL MEMBER TOM BERG – The Hawaii State Legislature in 2005 passed HB1309, which became ACT 247. Five years prior, Honolulu’s Mayor Jeremy Harris and his Administration advanced a study to address traffic on the H-1 Corridor resulting in highway technology being better than rail for relieving traffic – favoring a Bus Rapid Transit System over rail.
When the State Legislature and Governor signed off to approve ACT 247, all neighbor island Councils and Mayors could approve of raising their county GET by 0.5% of which could be used for highway technology- building toll roads, reversible expressways, and implementing a Bus Rapid Transit system.
In contrast, applicable to Oahu only, ACT 247 included language that prohibited a GET increase on Oahu for highway technology. Applicable to us on Oahu only, any system on the elevated fixed guideway that does not stay on the elevated fixed guideway cannot be funded with the rail surcharge- meaning, if an ambulance or fire truck or bus uses the elevated fixed guideway and comes down at grade to use our surface streets, that would be a prohibited use of the rail surcharge.
The State Legislature knew that when they crafted HB1309 in 2005, that if all modes of traffic relief were studied on Oahu, rail would be defeated like it was five years earlier and Bus Rapid Transit (highway technology) would prevail.
Thus, the intent of the State Legislature was not to advance options for the greatest mode of traffic relief to succeed for Oahu’s residents but rather allow for a rail system regardless of the cost, performance, ridership and tax burden it will generate.
Within ACT 247, language permits the State Legislature to profiteer off of the GET rail surcharge levied on Oahu. Thus far, the State has withheld $71 million of the $711 million collected. The State only needs between $600,000 to $700,000 a year to administer the rail surcharge- yet the State Legislature collects in excess of $16 million a year on Oahu from the rail surcharge and then uses that money meant for the rail endeavor for projects on neighbor islands where the tax is not levied.
In conclusion, there is a better way to resolve our traffic congestion without the State Legislature making a profit off of taxpayers on Oahu desperate for traffic relief.