| |  Print This Article

State Surveillance Drone Has Never Left The Ground

Honolulu harbor surveillance drone

BY JIM DOOLEY - The state purchased an unmanned aerial surveillance drone last year to patrol the skies over Honolulu Harbor but the aircraft can’t be flown because of heavy air traffic in the area.

The $75,000 drone was delivered last June – six months after Hawaii Reporter disclosed that the state had not sought and was unlikely to receive federal approval to actually fly the aircraft.

It has been stored since then in a state office on the Honolulu waterfront.

Harbors Division administrator Davis Yogi said the state didn’t check with the Federal Aviation Administration about flying the drone until it received inquiries from Hawaii Reporter in January 2011 on the subject. The FAA then told the state the drone could not be deployed in the crowded airspace adjacent to Honolulu International Airport and Hickam Air Force Base.

“It was a glitch,” said Yogi. “It works, we’re maintaining it, but we just can’t fly it.”

The drone “was already built” by the time the state talked to the FAA, Yogi continued. “We had to accept it,” he said.

Transportation Department spokesman Dan Meisenzahl said the drone purchase, by harbor security contractor Hawaiya Technologies, Inc., was a “mistake” and an example of ”government not working.”

The state may try to sell the drone or partner with another government agency for its use, said Meisenzahl.

Hawaiya Technologies was hired under a sole source $1.4 million harbor security contract in 2009.

Current Transportation Department Director Glenn Okimoto first sought approval of the Hawaiya sole source contract, including the drone acquisition, in 2007 when Okimoto was head of the DOT harbors division.

The drone is a small part of a much larger security system now in operation at several waterfront locations on Oahu. A second system is now being installed on Maui and more are planned for the Big Island and Kauai. Paperwork for the Maui security system said deployment of another drone was planned there, but Yogi said only the Honolulu drone was acquired.

Hawaii Reporter first began asking questions about the drone purchase in November 2010, but state officials delayed responding for months.

In early January of last year, the state was asked specifically if it had “sought or secured” an FAA “certificate of authorization” to fly drones over Honolulu harbor.

In February 2011, Meisenzahl noted that the drone surveillance idea was first approved during the administration of Gov. Linda Lingle.

After Gov. Neil Abercrombie took office in late 2010, his administration undertook an analysis of the harbor security

Harbors official Davis Yogi at security center video display

contract, Mesienzahl said in February 2011.

“Every significant expenditure and operational practice is under review including the UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) portion of this project,” said Meisenzahl.

After learning that FAA approval was necessary to fly the drone, the state approached the federal agency for a certificate of authorization, Meisenzahl said.

“The DOT has taken the first step in this process. It is part of the contractor's obligation to assemble all of the necessary paperwork,” Meisenzahl said.

Four months later, the drone was delivered to Hawaii and put into storage at  Pier 1 on the waterfront.

The state has been silent about the presence of the drone here, and its grounded status, since last year. HawaiiNewsNow last night reported that the drone had been delivered last June.

Hawaiya founder Paul Schultz flatly refused to discuss the company's harbor security work last year.

"This is not a friendly story,” Schultz told Hawaii Reporter. ”You're coming after me. You can come after me by yourself. But don't call me looking for information.”

After the drone was delivered, a key state official who oversaw Hawaiya’s work for the state, Kelvin Ogata, left his state job and went to work for a nonprofit company headed by Hawaiya owners Schultz and Mun Won Chang.

Schultz and Chang were the subjects of a long-running investigation conducted by the Naval Criminal Investigation Service concerning expenditure of Navy research funds when Schultz served as a U.S. Navy Rear Admiral and Chang worked as a civilian Navy employee.

Both left government service with no charges filed against them. Schultz was reduced in rank to captain before he retired. The pair are now married and active in local Democratic Party politics.

Schultz and Chang are business associates of former Hawaii Governor John Waihee. A company in which all three are involved, Aina Kai Environmental, performed subcontracting work on Hawaiya Technologies’ state harbor contract, according to records on file with the State Civil Defense Division.

The Honolulu and Maui harbor security systems were financed with grants of $1.4 million and $900,000 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency administered by the Civil Defense office.

Yogi said that although the two systems were installed under non-bid contracts to Hawaiiya Technologies, the state is seeking competitive bids for design and installation of the Big Island and Kauai harbor security programs.

The Honolulu surveillance drone was touted as an anti-terrorism tool in purchasing documents submitted to the state Office of Procurement.

The craft is equipped with a high-tech camera to scan and track surface activities.

Law enforcement agencies around the country are increasingly interested in using unmanned flying drones for surveillance and intelligence-gathering purposes.

The aircraft are far less expensive and intrusive than helicopters or piloted planes.

The Federal Aviation Administration is developing regulations for their use in civilian air space.

The American Civil Liberties Union has expressed concern about invasion of privacy issues raised by use of surveillance drones in other states and is monitoring the situation in Hawaii.

“Use of ‘Unmanned Aerial Vehicles’ or ‘drones’ by law enforcement has a vast potential for abuse,” Daniel Gluck, senior staff attorney for ACLU Hawaii, told Hawaii Reporter last year.

“The Hawaii Supreme Court has already ruled that warrantless infrared surveillance of people’s homes is an unconstitutional invasion of privacy.” Gluck said.

“The ACLU of Hawaii will monitor the details of this particular program (the kinds of technology used to perform the surveillance and the areas where it is used) to ensure it does not intrude on Hawaii residents’ and businesses’ protected privacy rights,” said Gluck.

Short URL: http://www.hawaiireporter.com/?p=48474

15 Comments for “State Surveillance Drone Has Never Left The Ground”

  1. [...] The Federal Aviation Administration refused to give the state permission to fly the device over the harbor. The FAA told the state the drone could not be deployed in airspace near the Honolulu International Airport and Hickam Air Force Base because the skies were too crowded, according to the Hawaii Reporter. [...]

  2. [...] The Federal Aviation Administration refused to give the state permission to fly the device over the harbor. The FAA told the state the drone could not be deployed in airspace near the Honolulu International Airport and Hickam Air Force Base because the skies were too crowded, according to theHawaii Reporter. [...]

  3. Ha ha! "It's Lingle's fault!"

    Her fault for approving the concept, her fault that they bought it at over a year after she was out of office, and her fault that they never even thought about contacting the FAA to see if they could fly it.

  4. That's another informative allocation about State Surveillance Drone and pretty thoughtfully this allocation let us know about State Surveillance Drone. Just keep up informing.

  5. Hello mate, I like this concept. I did not know much more about State Surveillance Drone but the allocation you did here makes me knowable about this system. Really this is a very informative input.

  6. Hello mate, I like this concept. I did not know much more about State Surveillance Drone but the allocation you did here makes me knowable about this system. Really this is a very informative input.

  7. Really a good article. Actually as vehicles are mentioned here I want to share something about cars. As we all know cars are the really stylish and luxurious invention that we ever had so, we have to maintain our car like we have to wash our car in proper interval to maintain its style and also we have to repair our car from good repair centers whenever required to get better performance from our car and also for our cars smoother running. .

  8. Actually after having a car we have to maintain our car otherwise we have to face a number of problems and have to pay a huge amount of money to repair center to repair our car. So if we maintain our car the small issues of car will not occur and if some problem beyond our capacity arises then we have to repair it from good repair centers that charge reasonable price and provides good services for our vehicles smoother running and better performance. .
    Volkswagen Repair Chicago

  9. State Surveillance Drone and whatever information you have shared here seems to me really outstanding to know and I'm really very happy to read about in such allocation from here.

  10. Finally I've come to know about State Surveillance Drone through reading out this post and I'm very much thankful to this blog admin for sharing this tech information here. Keep posting dude.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

News Cycle on The Rick Hamada Show








Recently Commented

  • Jack: The Harvard said in its publicly accessible abstract, not linked in this article; "Premenopausal women...
  • frankfurt hotel: don't believe drug or alcohol addiction is a disease. A disease is something you get when...
  • Samuel: Good article, there is much to learn. Conversion Rate Optimization
  • Samuel: I found a company providing Conversion Rate Optimization and loved it. I have read other topics on this...
  • Samuel: We could help in Conversion Rate Optimization service are going to go good.