BY CONGRESSMAN RON PAUL, R-TEXAS – Hurricane Sandy was one of the worst natural disasters the east coast has ever seen.  Clean-up and recovery will take months, if not years and estimates run in the tens of billions of dollars.  Parts of New York and New Jersey will never be the same.  Entire seashore communities have been wiped out, but the determination to rebuild has been lauded as courageous and admirable. Yet as with all natural disasters, Sandy raises uncomfortable questions about the extent to which taxpayers should fund the cleanup and the extent to which government programs create moral hazards.

For example, FEMA and the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) are expected to pick up the tab for much of the flood damage caused by the hurricane.  Of course this will mean more federal debt and inflation for the rest of us, since the program only has about $4 billion to work with and is already $18 billion in debt from hurricanes Katrina and Rita.  Many think there is a need for the government to provide flood insurance of this kind.  After all, the market would never provide insurance in flood prone areas at an affordable price.  But shouldn’t that tell us something?

Shouldn’t that tell us that it is a losing proposition to insure homes in coastal areas and flood plains often threatened by severe and destructive weather patterns? And if it’s a losing proposition, should taxpayers subsidize the inevitable losses arising from federal flood insurance?

The NFIP disguises the real cost of flood insurance in flood prone areas, which influences homebuilding and sales in such areas.  Recklessly taking unwise risks when risk is underpriced is known as moral hazard.  When politicians decide that private insurance premiums are too high, as with houses built in flood plains, the solution is to under price the risk through federal subsidies.  The obvious and expected outcome is more danger to life and limb when disaster strikes.

Even NFIP has been forced to raise rates significantly in coastal areas, and is now dropping second homes from coverage altogether,

Many assume it is compassionate to entrust government central planners with disaster recovery.  However, the greatest compassion brings results, not just good intentions.  And we’ve seen how bureaucratic organizations like FEMA mismanaged recovery and relief in the wake of hurricanes Katrina and Ike.  Organizations such as the Red Cross and private companies like Home Depot and Duracell have already stepped in admirably to help those in need, and we can only hope FEMA has learned this time not to impede and frustrate private efforts as they have in the past.

Above all, my thoughts and prayers are with the victims of Hurricane Sandy in this tremendously difficult time and hope they can get their lives put back together as quickly and seamlessly as possible.

Comments

comments

5 COMMENTS

  1. Well I voted for him! But that's not enough anyhow. We need to stay involved and keep the liberty movement growing. The next generation of liberty leaders and believers are rising up. So let's keep fighting the good fight. Let's keep organizing and gaining experience. Eventually Americans will realize they want liberty. So let's make sure we're ready and able to serve when we are needed.

  2. Malia look at your own poll on rail, how does it compare to election results? It doesn't , when will you look into the
    counting of the ballots! Lingle loss is obvious as is Djou and Ben's and Tom Bergs. How can you do nothing about
    this fraud upon each and every voter! Black box voting. com owned by Bev Harris is where you should start, she will
    talk to you if you want to interview her as many in the media are doing today. Those who want justice don't have to beg
    so stop making me beg you, Please!

    • Something SUPER fishy is going on with politics in Hawaii. I've talked to many people who live all over the island, and not ONE person wanted rail. Why is it all of a sudden then that the "majority" wants rail? or was it the intentions of the media to twist or hide facts from the public. These people that voted pro-rail candidates (which to me, many of them have not COMMON SENSE) do they really know what's going on? or is it the intentional SMEARING by the media and in particular PRP that if you hear a lie enough times that you believe it as truth????? did any of these people voting for Caldwell, Mazie, Pine, Hanabusa, did they do their RESEARCH?????

Comments are closed.