Wednesday, April 24, 2024
More
    Home Blog Page 1985

    Political Tittle-tattle: News and Entertainment from Hawaii's Political Arena – Feb. 3, 2003-Hawaii's Most Anti-Business Former Governor Opens a Business; House-Senate Special Investigative Hearings Resume on Felix Expenditures; Chief Elections Officer May be Looking for Alternate Work; UH Professor Wins Initial Victory in Case Against University Union; Hawaii Not Open for Big Box Business; State Will Open Airport Taxi System; Public Told Emails No Good in Senate; Governor Unveils Plans for Helping Hawaii's Aging Population; Home of the Brave

    0

    “Malia headshot Image”

    ”Hawaii’s Most Anti-Business Former Governor Opens a Business”

    Former Gov. Benjamin Cayetano, who will go down in history as the most anti-small business governor ever to serve in Hawaii (or most states for that matter), has ironically just registered his own small business, according to the HawaiiReporter.com public record tracking system.

    The report, originally found in the state Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs public records, says Cayetano registered his business as “Benjamin J. Cayetano LLC,” a Domestic Limited Liability Corp., on Jan. 24, 2003.

    Cayetano is listed as the sole contact for the business, which is located at 1926 Okoa St., Honolulu, Hawaii 96821.

    Maybe he’ll get a taste of his own anti-business medicine when he has to follow all of the rules and regulations he put into law and has to pay for all of the mandates and taxes he put on business owners. Or maybe he’ll be forced to buy a whole lot of political fundraising tickets from his fellow Democrats in the position of authorizing or funding state or county contracts in hopes of being awarded more government work.

    ”House-Senate Special Investigative Hearings Resume on Felix Expenditures”

    The House-Senate Investigative Committee, the first committee of its kind in Hawaii formed in the summer of 2002 to look into state expenditures of more than $1.4 billion on special needs students and related programs since 1994, had its first meeting of 2003 this past Saturday behind closed doors.

    The 12-member bi-partisan committee will meet again on Tuesday, Feb. 4, at the Hawaii State Capitol.

    The investigation by this committee, which entailed issuing subpoenas to many of Hawaii’s private providers and state employees and directors with the Departments of Health and Education, uncovered questionable procurement of state contracts by then Superintendent Paul LeMahieu. In one case, he authorized a $600,000 contract to a woman he was in a “close personal relationship” with, according to testimony by the woman receiving the contract, the superintendent and other witnesses. LeMahieu quickly resigned after his actions, which included issuing the contract to the woman through another company because her company could not qualify for it, were exposed.

    During more than 100 hours of hearings, several other private providers were questioned about their billing practices, including Loveland Academy, which was accused by one of its former directors of improprieties.

    The committee also looked into allegations of wrongdoing and fraud by three federal court appointees

    Political Tittle-tattle: News and Entertainment from Hawaii’s Political Arena – Feb. 3, 2003-Hawaii’s Most Anti-Business Former Governor Opens a Business; House-Senate Special Investigative Hearings Resume on Felix Expenditures; Chief Elections Officer May be Looking for Alternate Work; UH Professor Wins Initial Victory in Case Against University Union; Hawaii Not Open for Big Box Business; State Will Open Airport Taxi System; Public Told Emails No Good in Senate; Governor Unveils Plans for Helping Hawaii’s Aging Population; Home of the Brave

    0

    “Malia headshot Image”

    ”Hawaii’s Most Anti-Business Former Governor Opens a Business”

    Former Gov. Benjamin Cayetano, who will go down in history as the most anti-small business governor ever to serve in Hawaii (or most states for that matter), has ironically just registered his own small business, according to the HawaiiReporter.com public record tracking system.

    The report, originally found in the state Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs public records, says Cayetano registered his business as “Benjamin J. Cayetano LLC,” a Domestic Limited Liability Corp., on Jan. 24, 2003.

    Cayetano is listed as the sole contact for the business, which is located at 1926 Okoa St., Honolulu, Hawaii 96821.

    Maybe he’ll get a taste of his own anti-business medicine when he has to follow all of the rules and regulations he put into law and has to pay for all of the mandates and taxes he put on business owners. Or maybe he’ll be forced to buy a whole lot of political fundraising tickets from his fellow Democrats in the position of authorizing or funding state or county contracts in hopes of being awarded more government work.

    ”House-Senate Special Investigative Hearings Resume on Felix Expenditures”

    The House-Senate Investigative Committee, the first committee of its kind in Hawaii formed in the summer of 2002 to look into state expenditures of more than $1.4 billion on special needs students and related programs since 1994, had its first meeting of 2003 this past Saturday behind closed doors.

    The 12-member bi-partisan committee will meet again on Tuesday, Feb. 4, at the Hawaii State Capitol.

    The investigation by this committee, which entailed issuing subpoenas to many of Hawaii’s private providers and state employees and directors with the Departments of Health and Education, uncovered questionable procurement of state contracts by then Superintendent Paul LeMahieu. In one case, he authorized a $600,000 contract to a woman he was in a “close personal relationship” with, according to testimony by the woman receiving the contract, the superintendent and other witnesses. LeMahieu quickly resigned after his actions, which included issuing the contract to the woman through another company because her company could not qualify for it, were exposed.

    During more than 100 hours of hearings, several other private providers were questioned about their billing practices, including Loveland Academy, which was accused by one of its former directors of improprieties.

    The committee also looked into allegations of wrongdoing and fraud by three federal court appointees

    Breaking up the DOE Stranglehold on Education in Hawaii with Local School Boards

    0

    “Laura Brown Image”

    On Friday, Jan. 31, Gov. Linda Lingle testified before the state House of Representatives Education committee on HB 1082 related to the creation of at least seven local school boards to bring decision making closer to each community.

    Over two dozen education reform bills introduced this legislative session carry an overriding theme: the public has been crying out for decentralization of Hawaii’ s statewide education agency for 30 of the 40 years it has been in existence and the time to act is now.

    Deductively, this means either 1) the majority in power in the legislature over the past 30 years didn’t give a hoot about what the public wanted or 2) didn’t have either the know how or will power to fix the mistake in the Hawaii State Constitution that created one statewide education agency.

    Functions of State Education Agencies (SEAs) vs. Local Education Agencies (LEAs) Hawaii is the only state in the U.S. classified as both a state education agency (SEA) and Local Education Agency (LEA). Every other state in the nation has local school districts. Research since 1975 has shown that the larger a school district, the lower the achievement of its students. Hawaii has one of the largest school districts in the country with close to the worst academic performance record.

    The role of an SEA is generally to monitor the performance of the LEA with regard to overall state and federal policies. In Hawaii, that monitoring function is non-existent.

    The concept of the local school board is similar to that of the town meeting, a practice dating back to the original Thirteen Colonies. The purpose of school boards today is to give communities a voice and provide local citizen control over public education.

    The school board hires a superintendent and holds that person responsible for managing the schools in accordance with federal law, state law and the school board’s policies. The local school board:
    *Sets the vision for the community’s education goals
    *Assesses educational needs and values of the community
    *Oversees the school district budget
    *Adopts operating policies
    *Assures systematic review and evaluations of all phases of the school program
    *Advocates on behalf of students and schools

    School board members are elected and serve as a link between schools to the larger community. School board members facilitate communication; in this way, they build support and understanding of public education in their communities.

    How will local governance be best achieved in Hawaii? Many bills focus on amending the constitution to allow for local school boards either by referendum or a majority vote in both the House and Senate. Proposals range from 7 to 17 boards and each define the composition of board members, either elected or appointed. However, either of these options means at least another year of delay toward improvement of Hawaii’s public schools. Alternately, the most expedient way to decentralize may be to revamp existing school/community-based management law to allow for elected high school complex governing boards.

    Buried in the jumble and confusion of words in current legislative proposals, a glimmer of wisdom can be found in SB667 in a quote from the 1999 National Commission on Governing America’s Schools, “The real work of learning happens in the classroom in the interaction between the teacher and student. This interaction is affected by the decisions of the principal, school boards, superintendents, state legislatures, state and federal government.” In other words, local control leads to decisions that are more about classrooms and child-learning than politics and power.

    ”’Laura Brown is a researcher and the education writer for HawaiiReporter.com. She can be reached via email at:”’ mailto:Laurabrown@Hawaii.rr.com

    Making Sense out of Legislation a Challenge

    0

    For those who don’t have the luxury of spending time with the state Legislature, it is that time of the year to share some of the more “notable” proposals forwarded by your legislators.

    Of course, the rage this year, as it has been for the past five years, is the mechanism to provide relief, comic or otherwise, called the tax credit. Lawmakers, for their lack of creativity, have come to regard the income tax credit as the panacea for all of the state’s problems.

    Just throw a tax credit out there and all the world will come to your door or at least that’s what lawmakers believe.

    And there are some real gems. Lawmakers are hell-bent on improving the economy and creating jobs because that is what they think their constituents want. So they throw out a proposal that will give a business 10 percent off its income taxes if that business creates a new job and pays that person 30 percent or more above the state average wage. All the business would have to do is to have at least three employees to begin with and no lay offs or reductions in the number of jobs during the twelve months following the hire of the new employee. What a deal, you get 10 percent off your income taxes just for hiring a “highly paid” employee.

    So what’s the big deal? Well, the bill gives the reader the impression that perhaps it’s aimed at helping small businesses with the requirement that the qualifying business must have at least three employees.

    Well, a large company like Macy’s has at least three employees. All that company would have to do is to bring in some highly paid vice president and they would qualify as long as they don’t lay anyone off in the next twelve months.

    They would be entitled to the 10 percent credit against what might be hundreds of thousands of dollars of income taxes. Give a few large companies like that the credit and sooner or later there will be no money from the net income tax on businesses.

    Then it seems lawmakers feel guilty about having required taxpayers to either get a license or stay in businesses, so they give out tax credits to soften the blow of what they have just socked to taxpayers. Enter the tax credit for having taken a driver’s education course. Now that youth who younger than 18 years of age are required to take a driver’s education class in order to get their driver’s license, lawmakers want to give them a tax credit to help offset the cost of the tuition for the class. Perhaps lawmakers think they can stop the grousing about the costly education requirement if they give them a rebate on part or all of their tuition.

    Then there is the tax credit that would rebate some portion of the cost of installing a grease trap. These grease traps are now required of all restaurants by either state or county law. So first they make restaurants put these contraptions in so that the grease doesn’t go into the sewers, now they come back and try to mitigate the pain of the cost with a tax credit. Seems like lawmakers just don’t want to take the heat for something that makes it more difficult to do business in the state, so they throw a tax credit at it.

    And sometimes lawmakers forget what they did in the past and try to correct the same problem a second time. Such is the case in the bill that would give a rebate on the cost of operating leases of aircraft equipment. This proposal comes a year after lawmakers decided to exempt the local airlines from the 4 percent general excise and use tax on their operating leases of aircraft and aircraft equipment. Oops! Maybe lawmakers really did want to subsidize the lease rent payments of the two local carriers. That’s all right, it is all green money anyway.

    Now don’t sell those lawmakers short. After all they do everything possible to help businesses like with the credit to entice businesses to participate in an industry tracking program. If businesses do participate in this proposed program, they could claim a $25 per employee credit. What did you say, what does that have to do with making things better to do business in Hawaii? We don’t know, but that would be an easy way to pick up some pocket change.

    So it is a credit here and credit there all the while lawmakers are bemoaning the fact that there isn’t enough money in the pot to fund everything they would like to fund. But what the heck, those tax credits represent nothing but free money.

    ”’Lowell L. Kalapa is the president of the Tax Foundation of Hawaii, a private, non-profit educational organization. For more information, please call 536-4587 or log on to”’ https://www.tfhawaii.org

    Hawaii's Public Schools Will be Improved with Decentralization, Elected District School Boards

    ”’These are some of the comments made by Laura Thielen, elected member of the State Board of Education, during a recent hearing at the Hawaii State Legislature in the House Committee on Education regarding House Bill No. 1082, which proposes an Amendment to Article X, Sections 2 and 3 of the Hawaii Constitution to Create Elected District School Boards.”’

    There is a lot of disagreement about our education system and how it should be operated. But I think we can all agree that our statewide student outcomes are not where we would like them to be, nor is student achievement where we have the potential to be. While there are many good things occurring in our public schools, we can be so much better than we are.

    Many people feel that changing the governance of the schools will not improve student achievement. I disagree. I believe true local control over the operations, management and finances of education will improve student outcomes for three reasons:

    *1. Smaller schools districts are better able to monitor, evaluate and support programs in schools, and to step in more quickly when programs are faltering or failing. The sheer size of our current system prevents the dedicated people within the DOE and the BOE from performing this job as well as a smaller district can.

    *2. High parent and community participation do improve student outcomes. A decentralized system places true financial and operational autonomy closer to the parents and communities. Local decision making that includes control over funding will increase parent and community participation. I believe one of the primary reasons for the lack of participation under the current system is the fact that our school-community bodies do not have true fiscal and operational autonomy.

    *3. Local districts can tailor educational services and distributions of funds to meet the unique demands of their constituency. Local boards will be more attuned to the needs and strengths of their communities, and can set their policies, operations, programs and funds accordingly.

    Several concerns are regularly raised when the topic of local boards is addressed. I believe HB 1082 provides good responses to the two concerns I hear most frequently:

    *1. People are concerned that local boards will mean that education funds will no longer be distributed equitably. Moreover, they are concerned that districts will begin competing for funds at the legislature. HB 1082 retains our current system of equitably distributing education funds across the state. Under this bill the State Board of Education is retained and is empowered to establish and oversee an equitable funding formula for each of the districts.

    *2. People are concerned that local boards mean we will abandon statewide education standards. HB 1082 clearly states that the State Board of Education will establish statewide education standards and oversee compliance with federal laws including No Child Left Behind.
    Local boards have the authority to develop and fund the educational services within their district that will enable their students to meet statewide standards. They will not be able to lower those standards.

    The topic of local school boards is highly charged and, unfortunately, become highly political as well. As you consider HB 1082, please also consider the dissatisfaction with the current system that has motivated many diverse people to support this measure.

    I ran for the Board of Education as a parent of public school children who is unhappy enough with the system to pull one of my children out into private school. I am not unique.

    We hold our children accountable to specific performance standards. We say we will impose consequences if they fail to meet these standards. But where is the accountability in our education system itself? Where is the accountability of the Board of Education? Where is the accountability of the Department of Education? The centralized Board and Department in Honolulu are too physically removed from our schools, our students and our communities to be truly accessible and to be held accountable.

    As a parent, I see HB 1082 as a vehicle for moving the responsibility and accountability for the education system closer to the school level, where I believe it belongs.

    I ask that you permit the voters of Hawaii to decide this issue that affects all of us so directly. We trust voters to be wise enough to vote for us. We should trust them to be wise enough to understand the issues surrounding the true control of their schools and the education of their children.

    I want to acknowledge the many hard-working and dedicated people within the Department of Education whom I have had the pleasure of meeting recently. I do not mean in any way to caste aspersions upon these people. They are committed to education, and we are lucky to have such people in this state. I simply believe the problem lies within the system, not the people. I am confident that if the Constitution is amended, that the Department personnel will have the ability to assist with the successful implementation of that new system.

    I also want to thank my fellow Board of Education members for their hard work and commitment. We are year-round volunteers who are passionate about improving education. While we may not agree on all issues, I appreciate the Board members who have supported my right to testify before you today as an individual.

    ”’Invitation to those in support of HB 1082: Please come to the Board of Education meeting Thursday, Feb. 6 at 7 p.m. and testify. If you want to talk about the issue, or want advice on how you can be more active, give me a call at 383-2717 (no calls after 7:00 p.m. please).”’

    Hawaii’s Public Schools Will be Improved with Decentralization, Elected District School Boards

    ”’These are some of the comments made by Laura Thielen, elected member of the State Board of Education, during a recent hearing at the Hawaii State Legislature in the House Committee on Education regarding House Bill No. 1082, which proposes an Amendment to Article X, Sections 2 and 3 of the Hawaii Constitution to Create Elected District School Boards.”’

    There is a lot of disagreement about our education system and how it should be operated. But I think we can all agree that our statewide student outcomes are not where we would like them to be, nor is student achievement where we have the potential to be. While there are many good things occurring in our public schools, we can be so much better than we are.

    Many people feel that changing the governance of the schools will not improve student achievement. I disagree. I believe true local control over the operations, management and finances of education will improve student outcomes for three reasons:

    *1. Smaller schools districts are better able to monitor, evaluate and support programs in schools, and to step in more quickly when programs are faltering or failing. The sheer size of our current system prevents the dedicated people within the DOE and the BOE from performing this job as well as a smaller district can.

    *2. High parent and community participation do improve student outcomes. A decentralized system places true financial and operational autonomy closer to the parents and communities. Local decision making that includes control over funding will increase parent and community participation. I believe one of the primary reasons for the lack of participation under the current system is the fact that our school-community bodies do not have true fiscal and operational autonomy.

    *3. Local districts can tailor educational services and distributions of funds to meet the unique demands of their constituency. Local boards will be more attuned to the needs and strengths of their communities, and can set their policies, operations, programs and funds accordingly.

    Several concerns are regularly raised when the topic of local boards is addressed. I believe HB 1082 provides good responses to the two concerns I hear most frequently:

    *1. People are concerned that local boards will mean that education funds will no longer be distributed equitably. Moreover, they are concerned that districts will begin competing for funds at the legislature. HB 1082 retains our current system of equitably distributing education funds across the state. Under this bill the State Board of Education is retained and is empowered to establish and oversee an equitable funding formula for each of the districts.

    *2. People are concerned that local boards mean we will abandon statewide education standards. HB 1082 clearly states that the State Board of Education will establish statewide education standards and oversee compliance with federal laws including No Child Left Behind.
    Local boards have the authority to develop and fund the educational services within their district that will enable their students to meet statewide standards. They will not be able to lower those standards.

    The topic of local school boards is highly charged and, unfortunately, become highly political as well. As you consider HB 1082, please also consider the dissatisfaction with the current system that has motivated many diverse people to support this measure.

    I ran for the Board of Education as a parent of public school children who is unhappy enough with the system to pull one of my children out into private school. I am not unique.

    We hold our children accountable to specific performance standards. We say we will impose consequences if they fail to meet these standards. But where is the accountability in our education system itself? Where is the accountability of the Board of Education? Where is the accountability of the Department of Education? The centralized Board and Department in Honolulu are too physically removed from our schools, our students and our communities to be truly accessible and to be held accountable.

    As a parent, I see HB 1082 as a vehicle for moving the responsibility and accountability for the education system closer to the school level, where I believe it belongs.

    I ask that you permit the voters of Hawaii to decide this issue that affects all of us so directly. We trust voters to be wise enough to vote for us. We should trust them to be wise enough to understand the issues surrounding the true control of their schools and the education of their children.

    I want to acknowledge the many hard-working and dedicated people within the Department of Education whom I have had the pleasure of meeting recently. I do not mean in any way to caste aspersions upon these people. They are committed to education, and we are lucky to have such people in this state. I simply believe the problem lies within the system, not the people. I am confident that if the Constitution is amended, that the Department personnel will have the ability to assist with the successful implementation of that new system.

    I also want to thank my fellow Board of Education members for their hard work and commitment. We are year-round volunteers who are passionate about improving education. While we may not agree on all issues, I appreciate the Board members who have supported my right to testify before you today as an individual.

    ”’Invitation to those in support of HB 1082: Please come to the Board of Education meeting Thursday, Feb. 6 at 7 p.m. and testify. If you want to talk about the issue, or want advice on how you can be more active, give me a call at 383-2717 (no calls after 7:00 p.m. please).”’

    Bush Offers $2.25 Trillion Budget for 2004

    0

    WASHINGTON (UPI) — President George W. Bush [released] a $2.25 trillion 2004 federal budget today, Monday, Feb. 3, expected to bolster defense and homeland security operations as the nation is poised on the brink of a war in the Middle East and crisis on the Korean peninsula.

    ”’To see the budget, go to”’ https://www.whitehouse.gov/news/usbudget/budget-fy2004/

    In addition to $399.1 billion in defense spending, up from $382.2 billion this year, the budget raises homeland security from $37.7 billion in 2003 to $41.3 billion in 2004.

    Even before the Shuttle Columbia disaster Saturday, the budget for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration had been increased to some $15.5 billion from $15 billion in 2003.

    At the same time, Bush has proposed a 10-year, $674 billion economic growth plan that includes more than $650 billion in tax cuts. It has triggered new charges from the Democrats that his budget is runaway deficit spending.

    The budget will estimate a deficit for fiscal 2003 of $307 billion and $304 billion for 2004 — both surpassing the 1992 record of $290 billion when Bush’s father was president.

    Democrats in the House of Representatives have charged that Bush’s tax plans would end in $1.7 trillion in debt by 2011.

    A Washington Post-ABC News poll released Sunday said 52 percent of Americans disapprove of how the president is handling the economy.

    The president’s budget books will be made public early Monday, encased in a white cover bearing a blue-line drawing of the White House.

    “Our first goal is clear: We must have an economy that grows fast enough to employ every man and woman who seeks a job. After recession, terrorist attacks, corporate scandals, and stock market declines, our economy is recovering — yet it is not growing fast enough, or strongly enough,” Bush said last week during his State of the Union address.

    The administration will submit its federal budget proposal to a Republican-controlled Congress as questions remain about exactly how much it will cost the United States to prosecute a war against Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein.

    “If war is forced upon us, we will fight with the full force and might of the United States military — and we will prevail,” Bush said in his State of the Union speech. “And as we and our coalition partners are doing in Afghanistan, we will bring to the Iraqi people food, and medicines, and supplies … and freedom.”

    Bush has proposed a higher defense budget than any since the early 1990s, and the Pentagon expects it to grow to $484 billion in spending by fiscal year 2009, according to sources familiar with the budget, including the Washington-based Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.

    The package makes the income tax reductions set for 2004 and 2006 permanent and effective this year, abolishes the marriage penalty and hikes the child tax credit to $1,000, both effective immediately.

    Part of Bush’s economic recovery plan would provide $3.6 billion for so-called Personal Re-employment Accounts that would provide the jobless with up to $3,000 to use in their search for work.

    But the plan also eliminates the tax on share dividends and Democrats lambasted it as a bail-out for the wealthy that will produce deficits of more than $1 trillion over the next decade and do little to stimulate the economy. An effective plan, they said, would have to be immediate, benefit as many people as possible and be fiscally responsible.

    With the threat of a conflict that might disrupt half of the United States’ oil supplies, Bush has proposed funding what he calls the Freedom Fuel and Freedom Car Initiatives, slated to reverse America’s dependence on foreign oil sources. He proposed spending $1.2 billion over five years to develop technology needed for viable hydrogen-powered fuel cells to power cars and trucks.

    The budget proposal will provide $6 billion over 10 years to pay for Project BioShield, “next generation” vaccines for anthrax, smallpox, botulinum toxin, and additional unspecified funds to produce and purchase so-called treatments for dangerous agents such as Ebola and plague.

    Bush proposed $15 billion for an emergency HIV/AIDS plan that will address the international pandemic, particularly in Africa and the Caribbean. The fund would receive $2 billion in 2004 and then increase in subsequent years.

    The president sought to resurrect interest in his faith-based and “compassionate conservative” agendas with $450 million for mentors for children of prison inmates and more than 1 million disadvantaged middle school children. The administration also announced a three-year, $600 million federal treatment initiative for drug-addicted Americans.

    Medicare reform has been a cornerstone of Bush’s domestic agenda, along with providing prescription drug coverage for seniors who have been faced with escalating medication costs. Bush said he plans to set aside $400 billion to revamp the senior health insurance plan to give the elderly more choices in how they receive their medical care.

    The administration also proposed providing in 2004 an additional $3.25 billion in federal funding for Medicaid, the health insurance program for low-income families. The program would receive a total of $12.7 billion over the next seven years under the budget proposal.

    Copyright 2003 by United Press International. All rights reserved.

    Kalpana Had Thought of Death in a Crash

    0

    NEW DELHI, Feb. 3 (UPI) — India-born Columbia astronaut Kalpana Chawla had told her brother that if she had to die, she hoped it would be in a crash.

    The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that her words haunted her brother Girish as he flew from Atlanta to Houston to join the rest of bereaved Chawla family.

    “I am shocked, stunned,” Girish Chawla said. “She was a very determined person. She was totally dedicated to her profession.”

    Girish Chawla and his wife Harvinder Gill were woken by a call from relatives in India to say that Columbia had broken up some 200,000 feet above Texas and about 16 minutes from when it was to land at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

    “I said, ‘Oh, no. I can’t believe it,’ ” Gill said. “I came hurriedly down the stairs and turned the TV on. There it was — on the TV.”

    Kalpana Chawla’s father Banarsi Das, mother Sanjogta, and her two sisters and a sister-in-law had recently come from India to witness the Jan. 16 launch of Columbia from Cape Canaveral.

    Her India-born brother Sanjay Chawla too is scheduled to fly to Houston to join the devastated family.

    Kalpana lived for the very event she died in. In pre-flight interviews, she had described the ascent, re-entry, and landing of the spacecraft as the most exciting and enjoyable moments of the space odyssey, The Times of India reported.

    Kalpana Chawla, 42, born in north Indian town Karnal, had immigrated to United States in 1984 to pursue master’s degree in aeronautical engineering.

    She saw herself as a citizen of the world and following her debut space flight in 1997, she described how spinning around the Earth in just 90 minutes gave her a sense of belonging to the whole planet and not just any one country or community, the newspaper reported.

    Kalpana remained in touch with her first school and engineering college. Her school in Karnal, Tagore Bal Niketan, had named its science room after her, the first Indian woman astronaut.

    A condolence meeting was held Monday at the Panjab Engineering College in Chandigarh where she graduated before moving to United States to do her Masters in aeronautical engineering.

    She became India’s national heroine in 1997 after her first foray into space. She made it to the cover of India’s leading weekly India Today last month.

    She has dominated the newspaper headlines for the last two days in India, overshadowing major political events. She has found an immediate fame and recognition after her death.

    India’s junior federal minister I D Swami announced the foundation of a medical college cum hospital in Karnal. The Haryana state government declared a two-day mourning period in her memory and all government offices, schools and colleges remained shut Monday as a mark of respect to Kalpana Chawla.

    Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee in a message to U.S. President George W. Bush, said, “We convey our heartfelt sympathies at the tragedy, which has overtaken the space shuttle Columbia. We mourn with you in this moment of grief and our hearts go out to the families of the bright young men and women who worked on the spacecraft.”

    “For us in India, the fact that one of them was an Indian-born woman adds a special poignancy to the tragedy,” he said.

    “We in India had been specially proud that our own Kalpana Chawla was part of this space mission. Alas, we have tragically, though heroically, lost her. We are proud of you, Kalpana, we salute you,” India’s President A.P. J. Abdul Kalam said.

    Chawla was flight engineer and mission specialist aboard the shuttle Columbia. She graduated from Punjab Engineering College before beginning work at NASA Ames Research Center in fluid dynamics.

    She received a master’s degree in 1984 from the University of Texas, and in 1988 received doctorate in aerospace engineering from the University of Colorado.

    NASA selected Chawla as an astronaut candidate in 1994, and she joined the 15th group of astronauts in March 1995.

    Copyright 2003 by United Press International. All rights reserved.

    Grassroot Perspective – Feb. 3, 2003-Best Defense; Evolution Joke; Union Snubs Reason Survey; Dividend and Conquer: Why the Bush Tax Plan Included the Dividend Tax Repeal

    0

    “Dick Rowland Image”

    ”Shoots (News, Views and Quotes)”

    – Best Defense

    Book Review

    By Jim O’Keefe, Hilo, Hawaii, who can be reached by email at: mailto:jimkeefe@hilo.net

    The reasons to not be defenseless keep presenting themselves, even
    though the mainstream press fails to report it. A book titled “THE
    BEST DEFENSE” by Robert A. Waters is a stinging rebuke to those who
    tell us to give up our guns and just dial 911. The book lists case
    after case where honest citizens used firearms to defend themselves,
    their families, employees and students. (Did you know that two of the school shootings were stopped by citizens with firearms? The press sort of glossed over that, didn’t they?) In all of the cases presented in Waters’ book, there wasn’t time for police to respond. The events were over long before the police could arrive.

    In too many of the cases the police, or more accurately, the criminal
    justice system, had punted some career criminal back into the
    community to prey on the weak and defenseless. This book is NOT the lament of crime victims: it is a strong telling of case after case of
    a would-have-been victim who fought back and won, and won only because they were prepared to take responsibility for the protection of themselves and those around them.

    It is a little too late to give this book as a Christmas gift, but if
    you know someone who thinks guns never help and only hurt, show them this eye-opener. This is the second of Waters’ two books on the
    subject, and the more comprehensive. It is published by Palladin Press and available through Amazon.com and other bookstores.

    – Evolution Joke

    Source undisclosed

    A story that the Evolution teacher told in class. He said that while
    he was in Costa Rica last week, he visited the zoo to see the
    Chimpanzees. One of them was reading two books. In one hand he had a Bible and in the other The Origin of the Species. Upon asking the zoo attendant what the chimpanzee was doing with the books, he was told that he was trying to decide whether he was his brother’s keeper or his keeper’s brother.

    – Union Snubs Reason Survey

    The International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), a labor union
    of firefighters throughout the U.S. and Canada, is blocking Reason’s
    efforts to conduct an efficiency and quality analysis of emergency
    medical service (EMS) delivery in 200 major urban areas.

    Some performance-related data suggest that private EMS offers better quality and more efficient service than does EMS provided by fire departments. Reason set out to analyze the performance of each
    delivery method and promote best practices across the country.

    The Reason survey requested data on provider type, area covered,
    utilization rates and cost information. In a letter to its membership, the IAFF asks members to ignore the survey and accuses Reason of being a “shadow promoter of privatization of public services” and notes that our goal is to support the widespread privatization of EMS.

    Reason takes seriously any attempt by government to expand into
    privately provided services. We believe that services ought to be
    provided in competitive private markets, where choice will drive
    performance, accountability, innovations, and efficiency.

    Reason’s request for transparency and accountability from both fire
    departments and private providers is an opportunity for objective
    analysis of EMS data. By refusing to participate in the survey, the
    IAFF showed that it does not have the confidence to compete with
    private companies on the basis of performance.

    Above article is quoted from Reason Report Winter 2003

    ”Roots (Food for Thought)”

    Dividend and Conquer

    Why the Bush Tax Plan Included the Dividend Tax Repeal

    By Chris Kinnan

    The big dog of the legislative calendar this year is President Bush’s
    new economic growth and jobs package. And, at the center of this tax
    relief plan is the repeal of the dividend tax, which will return over
    $300 billion to Americans over the next 10 years.

    It’s big, and it’s bold, and news that President Bush wants to
    completely repeal the tax on dividend income came as something of a
    shock. People asked, what the heck is the dividend tax anyway?

    Good question. Currently, dividends are taxed once as part of
    corporate earnings, and again as the personal income of the investor
    who receives the dividend. This double taxation creates an effective
    tax rate that can approach 60 percent. No wonder that as a result,
    firms paying dividends have dropped from 66 percent in 1978 to 21
    percent in 1999, according to the American Shareholder Association.
    This double taxation also punishes investment and discourages capital formation and jobs creation.

    Double taxation is clearly bad policy, but other observers were
    surprised Bush went for total repeal. But, Bush was right on target.
    Proposing only a 50 percent repeal, as we originally heard might
    happened, would be a feeble half measure. A 50 percent repeal leaves plenty of room for Congress to play games and sock it certain groups of dividend earners. The result of a 50 percent repeal: a tax code that is ”’more”’ complicated than before, and less fair. So, completely repealing the dividend tax is therefore excellent public policy and represents the first tax reform since 1986. Bush seems in control, focusing on the principles and benefits of repeal to the economy, while everyone else seems confused and defensive and lacking their own ideas. That’s why the initial response from the Washington interest groups is all over the map. Of course, among Democrats, the response was predictable: class warfare and general hysteria. The Democrats immediately began hollering about favoring the rich, and Nancy Pelosi said the Bush tax plan sent America “careening off the road recklessly.”

    Many state governments also hate the repeal of the dividend tax,
    because it undermines their tax revenues, which track the federal
    dividend tax in 37 states. The National Association of Governors
    whines that dividend repeal will cost states a total of $4 billion
    annually in lost taxes. That’s a problem as states continue to
    overspend like it’s 1999. Greedy states might even add surcharge taxes on dividends, undermining the positive benefits of the Bush plan. But, all governments like taxes, so the state response is fairly
    predictable.

    More unusual is that even the business lobby is pretty lukewarm on the plan. What corporate America really wants is more breaks on new investment, or an end to taxes on money earned overseas. These are good policies, too, but Bush had to make some choices. After Enron and Worldcom, the corporate community isn’t exactly getting a lot of sympathy from the American public. Thus, Bush focused on the dividend repeal, because dividends are taxed on individuals’ tax returns.

    Another reason CSE likes the dividend repeal is because it moves
    towards fundamental tax reform. The tax code has a lot of unusual
    creatures roaming through its pages. For instance, chances are the new mall in your town was financed by a Real Estate Investment Trust, or REIT. REITs are special real estate investment vehicles that don’t pay income taxes, but their dividend distribution is taxed. Because REITs don’t pay income taxes, under the Bush plan REIT investors still have to pay dividend taxes. That’s fair-because there’s no REIT income tax, the tax on REIT dividends is not double taxation.

    https://www.cse.org/processor/printer.php?issue_id=1237

    ”Evergreen (Today’s Quote)”

    “The citizen of today, even in the most civilized states, is not only
    secured but defectively against other citizens who aspire to exploit
    and injure him … he is also exploited and injured almost without
    measure by the government itself — in other words, by the very agency which professes to protect him. … But he can no more escape the tax-gatherer and the policemen, in all their protean and multitudinous guises, than he can escape the ultimate mortician.”
    – H.L. Mencken

    ”’See Web site”’ https://www.grassrootinstitute.org ”’for further information. Join its efforts at “Nurturing the rights and responsibilities of the individual in a civil society. …” or email or call Grassroot of Hawaii Institute President Richard O. Rowland at mailto:grassroot@hawaii.rr.com or (808) 487-4959.”’

    From Concerns of a Child to Staying Sober

    0

    “Suzanne Gelb Image”

    Dear Readers:

    As an added resource, over the next few months I will supplement my answers with self-help materials. Supplemental reading for today’s answers can be found in my book “Welcome Home. A Book About Overcoming Addictions” (pp. 59-60 for Answer 1; pp. 61 for Answer 2). For more information visit my Web site at www.DrGelbSays.com.

    ”Hectic Schedule – Why the Panic?”

    Dear Dr. Gelb:

    I’m 12 years old and my mom works part time as a salesperson when we’re at school, and she cares for my little sister and me the rest of the time. When mom’s around she is always busy and it is hectic at home. She is always rushing and at night sometimes I go downstairs when I’m supposed to be asleep and I peak in the kitchen and most times she sits at the kitchen table and pigs out. I’m learning in school about how obesity is bad for people’s health, I worry about her.

    Concerned Kid

    A: Dr. Gelb says . . .

    Dear Concerned:

    Oh 12-year-old, what it would be like to be 12 again and be as smart and observant as you are. You obviously love your mother very much and even at the chance at being scolded, if I were you I would mention to her how much I loved her and that I wish she wouldn’t eat so much. I would tell her that I am studying in school how unhealthy it is to be obese and I certainly don’t want to lose her as my mother before I go to college. Then I would give her a big hug and go back to bed.

    ”Good feelings – Will They Last?”

    Dear Dr. Gelb:

    For three months now I have kicked a drinking habit. I feel good about it, but stress gets me riled up. I’m determined not to go off the wagon, but I wish that upsets would not get to me the way they do.

    Ex-Drinker

    A: Dr. Gelb says . . .

    Dear Drinker Who Doesn’t Drink:

    I believe that it is so important for people who have kicked an addictive habit such as drinking to remember that they are drinkers who don’t drink, rather than ex-drinkers. I urge them to remember how easy it was to blame others for their habit — “they made me mad or frustrated; they were doing things wrong and relying on me to do everything for them; they are making mistakes that I have to correct.” Then there are “the road hogs, bad smells, bad food in restaurants, and uncooperative wife and children.” These excuses have been used by many to justify an addictive habit.

    I can only say that in my opinion many addictions are by choice, and no matter how painful withdrawal and abstaining may be, it is worth it. You have obviously kicked the habit or at least refused to succumb to it for a while. I hope that you never allow the reasons above or similar self-talk to con you into taking another drink. Some individuals who have found themselves at a similar point of recovery such as you describe, have later found that they developed the ability to have a social glass of wine or their favorite beverage and not succumb to a habitual need for it.

    ”’Suzanne J. Gelb, Ph.D., J.D. authors this daily column, Dr. Gelb Says, which answers questions about daily living and behavior issues. Dr. Gelb is a licensed psychologist in private practice in Honolulu. She holds a Ph.D. in Psychology and a Ph.D. in Human Services. Dr. Gelb is also a published author of a book on Overcoming Addictions and a book on Relationships.”’

    ”’This column is intended for entertainment use only and is not intended for the purpose of psychological diagnosis, treatment or personalized advice. For more about the column’s purpose, see”’ “An Online Intro to Dr. Gelb Says”

    ”’Email your questions to mailto:DrGelbSays@hawaiireporter.com More information on Dr. Gelb’s services and related resources available at”’ https://www.DrGelbSays.com