“Suzanne Gelb Image”

”Employee Resistance, How to Handle?”

Dear Dr. Gelb:

I am a supervisor in a small temp agency. Our office often seeks ways to maximize efficiency, including sending employees to trainings on the latest PC software. One employee has been resistant to how computerized our office is becoming and sometimes takes sick days when trainings are scheduled. I understand how intimidating technology can be but this knowledge is necessary for our company to stay competitive. I have spoken to this employee, who insists it is coincidental when his sick days coincide with trainings. What’s the best approach?

Improvement-Oriented

Dr. Gelb says . . .

Dear Improvement:

It is important for supervisors to be able to see through any rationalizations and excuses that an employee may have. And yes, some employees are resistant to learning and in this computerized age it is understandable that some may fear high-tech equipment — the fear of not being able to understand, the fear of appearing ignorant.

In my opinion, if an employee’s performance is dependent on new techniques such as those afforded by state-of-the-art technology, then they would have no alternative but to learn these systems, or to seek other employment.

As a wise teacher once said, “a carpenter could not do his job if he had a fear of a skill saw.”

”Business Negotiating, How To Succeed?”

Dear Dr. Gelb:

My husband and I own a clothing business and it is doing well. Why is it that when I am negotiating contracts or deals I break out in an embarrassing rash on my face and neck?

Negotiator

Dr. Gelb says . . .

Dear Negotiator:

Of course, always consult one’s trusted physician for issues involving the physical body.

That being said, from a psychological point of view, in my opinion there can be a psychosomatic-type correlation between fear and symptoms such as skin issues. In some instances a connection has been made between symptoms such as a skin rash or blotchiness, and fear. One such instance occurred when a newly licensed Realtor was trying to negotiate a settlement on an important deal and broke out in hives, while at the same time experiencing a subconscious fear of being wrong or making a mistake.

“I think deep down I’m afraid the sellers will think that I really don’t know what I’m talking about,” said the Realtor. “I’m sure they will find something wrong with what I say,” he added.

There are numerous types of scenarios that could trigger a change in chemistry resulting in a symptom such as a rash. The reasons that trigger such symptoms are unique to each person. Generally speaking, however, the type of reaction described in your question is not uncommon. It is almost like stage fright and can cause a person to lose their sense of authority.

This brings to mind a quote that someone shared with me recently. Its source was attributed to our 35th U.S. President, John F. Kennedy — “Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate.”

”’Suzanne J. Gelb, Ph.D., J.D. authors this daily column, Dr. Gelb Says, which answers questions about daily living and behavior issues. Dr. Gelb is a licensed psychologist in private practice in Honolulu. She holds a Ph.D. in Psychology and a Ph.D. in Human Services. Dr. Gelb is also a published author of a book on Overcoming Addictions and a book on Relationships.”’

”’This column is intended for entertainment use only and is not intended for the purpose of psychological diagnosis, treatment or personalized advice. For more about the column’s purpose, see”’ “An Online Intro to Dr. Gelb Says”

”’Email your questions to mailto:DrGelbSays@hawaiireporter.com More information on Dr. Gelb’s services and related resources available at”’ https://www.DrGelbSays.com

“Suzanne Gelb Image”

”Employee Resistance, How to Handle?”

Dear Dr. Gelb:

I am a supervisor in a small temp agency. Our office often seeks ways to maximize efficiency, including sending employees to trainings on the latest PC software. One employee has been resistant to how computerized our office is becoming and sometimes takes sick days when trainings are scheduled. I understand how intimidating technology can be but this knowledge is necessary for our company to stay competitive. I have spoken to this employee, who insists it is coincidental when his sick days coincide with trainings. What’s the best approach?

Improvement-Oriented

Dr. Gelb says . . .

Dear Improvement:

It is important for supervisors to be able to see through any rationalizations and excuses that an employee may have. And yes, some employees are resistant to learning and in this computerized age it is understandable that some may fear high-tech equipment — the fear of not being able to understand, the fear of appearing ignorant.

In my opinion, if an employee’s performance is dependent on new techniques such as those afforded by state-of-the-art technology, then they would have no alternative but to learn these systems, or to seek other employment.

As a wise teacher once said, “a carpenter could not do his job if he had a fear of a skill saw.”

”Business Negotiating, How To Succeed?”

Dear Dr. Gelb:

My husband and I own a clothing business and it is doing well. Why is it that when I am negotiating contracts or deals I break out in an embarrassing rash on my face and neck?

Negotiator

Dr. Gelb says . . .

Dear Negotiator:

Of course, always consult one’s trusted physician for issues involving the physical body.

That being said, from a psychological point of view, in my opinion there can be a psychosomatic-type correlation between fear and symptoms such as skin issues. In some instances a connection has been made between symptoms such as a skin rash or blotchiness, and fear. One such instance occurred when a newly licensed Realtor was trying to negotiate a settlement on an important deal and broke out in hives, while at the same time experiencing a subconscious fear of being wrong or making a mistake.

“I think deep down I’m afraid the sellers will think that I really don’t know what I’m talking about,” said the Realtor. “I’m sure they will find something wrong with what I say,” he added.

There are numerous types of scenarios that could trigger a change in chemistry resulting in a symptom such as a rash. The reasons that trigger such symptoms are unique to each person. Generally speaking, however, the type of reaction described in your question is not uncommon. It is almost like stage fright and can cause a person to lose their sense of authority.

This brings to mind a quote that someone shared with me recently. Its source was attributed to our 35th U.S. President, John F. Kennedy — “Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate.”

”’Suzanne J. Gelb, Ph.D., J.D. authors this daily column, Dr. Gelb Says, which answers questions about daily living and behavior issues. Dr. Gelb is a licensed psychologist in private practice in Honolulu. She holds a Ph.D. in Psychology and a Ph.D. in Human Services. Dr. Gelb is also a published author of a book on Overcoming Addictions and a book on Relationships.”’

”’This column is intended for entertainment use only and is not intended for the purpose of psychological diagnosis, treatment or personalized advice. For more about the column’s purpose, see”’ “An Online Intro to Dr. Gelb Says”

”’Email your questions to mailto:DrGelbSays@hawaiireporter.com More information on Dr. Gelb’s services and related resources available at”’ https://www.DrGelbSays.com

“Suzanne Gelb Image”

”Employee Resistance, How to Handle?”

Dear Dr. Gelb:

I am a supervisor in a small temp agency. Our office often seeks ways to maximize efficiency, including sending employees to trainings on the latest PC software. One employee has been resistant to how computerized our office is becoming and sometimes takes sick days when trainings are scheduled. I understand how intimidating technology can be but this knowledge is necessary for our company to stay competitive. I have spoken to this employee, who insists it is coincidental when his sick days coincide with trainings. What’s the best approach?

Improvement-Oriented

Dr. Gelb says . . .

Dear Improvement:

It is important for supervisors to be able to see through any rationalizations and excuses that an employee may have. And yes, some employees are resistant to learning and in this computerized age it is understandable that some may fear high-tech equipment — the fear of not being able to understand, the fear of appearing ignorant.

In my opinion, if an employee’s performance is dependent on new techniques such as those afforded by state-of-the-art technology, then they would have no alternative but to learn these systems, or to seek other employment.

As a wise teacher once said, “a carpenter could not do his job if he had a fear of a skill saw.”

”Business Negotiating, How To Succeed?”

Dear Dr. Gelb:

My husband and I own a clothing business and it is doing well. Why is it that when I am negotiating contracts or deals I break out in an embarrassing rash on my face and neck?

Negotiator

Dr. Gelb says . . .

Dear Negotiator:

Of course, always consult one’s trusted physician for issues involving the physical body.

That being said, from a psychological point of view, in my opinion there can be a psychosomatic-type correlation between fear and symptoms such as skin issues. In some instances a connection has been made between symptoms such as a skin rash or blotchiness, and fear. One such instance occurred when a newly licensed Realtor was trying to negotiate a settlement on an important deal and broke out in hives, while at the same time experiencing a subconscious fear of being wrong or making a mistake.

“I think deep down I’m afraid the sellers will think that I really don’t know what I’m talking about,” said the Realtor. “I’m sure they will find something wrong with what I say,” he added.

There are numerous types of scenarios that could trigger a change in chemistry resulting in a symptom such as a rash. The reasons that trigger such symptoms are unique to each person. Generally speaking, however, the type of reaction described in your question is not uncommon. It is almost like stage fright and can cause a person to lose their sense of authority.

This brings to mind a quote that someone shared with me recently. Its source was attributed to our 35th U.S. President, John F. Kennedy — “Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate.”

”’Suzanne J. Gelb, Ph.D., J.D. authors this daily column, Dr. Gelb Says, which answers questions about daily living and behavior issues. Dr. Gelb is a licensed psychologist in private practice in Honolulu. She holds a Ph.D. in Psychology and a Ph.D. in Human Services. Dr. Gelb is also a published author of a book on Overcoming Addictions and a book on Relationships.”’

”’This column is intended for entertainment use only and is not intended for the purpose of psychological diagnosis, treatment or personalized advice. For more about the column’s purpose, see”’ “An Online Intro to Dr. Gelb Says”

”’Email your questions to mailto:DrGelbSays@hawaiireporter.com More information on Dr. Gelb’s services and related resources available at”’ https://www.DrGelbSays.com

“Malia Lt Blue top Image”

”Come on Democrats, Just ‘Fess Up: The Special Session was Just a Show”

Democrats should just admit the Tuesday, July 8 special session at the Hawaii state Legislature was really a show — a pro-wrestling match between Hawaii’s two major political parties.

They should be honest and say they wanted to flex their muscles and give the Republicans a good, old-fashioned whupping.

Because give a whupping they did.

They showed with 20 of 25 seats in the Senate and 36 of 51 in the House that they could put Hawaii’s new Republican governor in her place and override 6 of the 50 vetoes.

They showed her who is boss.

And they showed they don’t mind breaking their own code of honor and long-standing tradition of not overriding a governor’s fiscal vetoes — a tradition to which they’ve adhered without exception over the last 40 years while Democrat governors have been in power.

There is only one problem. Democrats forgot something really important when they set up these theatrics.

Sure they had their cheerleaders — including professional fundraisers not competent enough or just too lazy to get funds privately, even after Lingle’s cabinet offered to help them, and so sought state government grant subsidies.

They had their Korean War Veterans in uniform who were told to show up to protest Gov. Linda Lingle’s veto of $30,000 for their 50th commemoration celebration. This despite the fact they already received a $90,000 appropriation, and the fact that the governor’s cabinet has helped raise $18,000 more and pledged to get $12,000 more so the celebration will go on.

They also had their bread and butter public union thugs waiting in the wings.

What a wonderful picture they made sitting together in benches above the Senate and House arenas.

But again, Democrats forgot something important, something essential to their end victory.

They forgot their audience.

They forgot all the people of Hawaii were watching to see what kind of performance they’d give. To see if they’d have good sportsmanship, play fair and be in the fight with true passion or just for show and to make them look superior.

At the conclusion of the match, although Democrats won all six rounds, overriding six of the governor’s vetoes, they lost many of their fans.

And though the special interest cheerleaders might help the Democrats in their electioneering, it is all the fans who really count on Election Day in 2004.

”Special Session Unorganized, Not Thought Out”

It seemed as if Democrat leadership in the Legislature was just “winging it” during the special session.

In the early minutes of the Senate session, proper procedure was not being followed. There was no “Order of the Day” for senators and members of the public to follow, so no one knew which bills were up for discussion. Then when the first version of the Order of the Day was passed out, it simply said “vetoes” and did not list the bills up for consideration.

The House, confused by the Senate’s disorganization, simply printed all 50 of the governor’s vetoes on its Order of the Day, to ensure they would override the same bills as the Senate did.

Also, the Senate Democrat leadership neglected to tell the Republican minority that there was a special session on Tuesday or what bills would be challenged.

House minority leaders say they had to attend Democrat press conferences with the media in order to find out what time they were supposed to be in session and what bills might be covered.

Minority Republicans say these were not oversights, rather intentional acts to prevent real debate and a truly good legislative agenda from moving forward.

”Several Mistakes Expose Democrats for False Session”

At a July 7 press conference, Senate President Robert Bunda and House Speaker Calvin Say told Hawaii media they were calling a special session to ensure the “health, welfare and safety of the people of Hawaii.”

They said they disagreed with the governor’s statement that she ensured no safety nets were broken for those in need and that subsidies she vetoed to specific charities were duplicative or expanded services.

But as soon as the session started, it seems Democrat leaders forgot their pledge, and instead overturned six bills, four of which had nothing to do with what they termed “health and welfare.”

*The first bill they tackled was to give the Korean War veterans $30,000 for their 50th anniversary celebration, a bill that had nothing to do with health or welfare. Democrats insisted their support of this bill made them “patriotic” and Republicans “not patriotic” which of course caused a huge ruckus. Republicans pointed out the governor vetoed the $30,000 because her cabinet took the initiative to help raise the money privately and already has had success, raising $18,000 and negotiating with the city to have fees waived to make up the remaining $12,000.

*Another bill they overrode had nothing to do with health and welfare. Democrats sided with the public sector unions in overriding the governor’s veto of binding arbitration, which allows union leaders to avoid strikes and instead rely on a decision by three arbitrators on one panel as to what their salary increases should be. The governor, Republican legislators and Sen. Colleen Hanabusa, D-Waianae, voted against binding arbitration because the arbitrator does not have to use as a criteria what the state can afford. In other words, union leaders get to charge as much as the arbitration panel of three says on the state’s credit card and the taxpayers have to find a way to pay it back. Typically unions get much higher increases under binding arbitration, usually double digit increases, with little or no effort or risk, while taxpayers are bound to foot the bill.

*A third bill again had nothing to do with health and welfare, rather with agricultural land in Hawaii and zoning of that land. Saying they had the farmers beating down their door, Democrats voted to override the governor’s veto of SB 255, relating to agriculture. The governor originally planned to sign the bill saying it was “worthy,” but it was technically flawed according to the state attorney general, so she asked Legislators to fix the bill and send it to her in the next session. Democrats refused and overrode her veto, also turning down an amendment proposed by Republicans and approved by the governor that would have fixed the flaws. Now, as is, the governor and her staff says there will be “unintended adverse consequences.”

*A fourth bill they overrode had nothing to do with health and welfare, rather with power and money. With the power of the highly respected state auditor behind them, Democrat legislators authorized the auditor to audit any agency in the administrative branch and charge the agency for it. The governor argued the bill invites duplication and waste of limited resources for the many departments that must budget for and schedule their own audits.

Bills five and six can be argued as “health and welfare bills,” though Republicans argue these are duplicative subsidies or expanded services the state cannot afford.

*Democrats voted to override the governor’s veto of SB 745 relating to emergency medical services. This bill requires the Department of Health to establish, administer and maintain an aeromedical emergency medical services system statewide, but the attorney general argued the bill opens the state to liability because it is written with the term “statewide” but only is intended to serve Maui county. The governor also said the state cannot afford the $1 million it will take to start up the service. Republicans argued the service will not save even one life anyway this year as it is not set to start until July 2004. But Democrats disagreed with the arguments by the governor, the attorney general and Republicans, saying by 2004 the state will be able to afford the $1 million and will not face additional liability issues.

*Democrats also raided the Rainy Day Fund to give more handouts and subsidies to the charities and non-profits that support them. Specifically Democrats voted to raid the state’s emergency fund — the rainy day fund — for $3.5 million to pay for services they deemed necessary, despite the fact that the governor’s human services and health directors made sure all essential services not new, expanded or duplicative were covered. The governor was forced to choose between making cuts to SB 1305 or raiding the state’s special fund because the budget she received from the Legislature was short $152 million thanks to a revenue projection shortfall announced by the council on revenues after the session closed May 1.

”Nasty Attitudes, Harsh Words Fly at Legislature”

Many House Democrats brought their nasty faces, snide voices and prewritten canned scripts to the session and took direction from a public relations flak cueing them from the sidelines.

House Speaker Calvin Say had to act like a disciplinarian father presiding over bratty children who would not listen and kept talking back. Several times during heated discussions, Democrats got down and dirty, launching personal attacks on the governor and her Republican counterparts. In several cases, the Representatives got so out of control that the House speaker had to call a recess and a caucus with Democrats.

Rep. Marcus Oshiro, D-Wahiawa, called the governor brainless and heartless, despite loud protests from Republicans and a good scolding from Rep. Cynthia Thielen who got in his face for the comments. This exchange led Say to call another recess and an eventual apology from Oshiro.

Rep. Michael Kahikina, D-Waianae, called Republicans and the governor “unpatriotic” for refusing to allocate $30,000 to the Korean War veterans for their 50th celebration, even though the governor’s appointees were successfully helping organizers raise the money privately.

Democrats in the Senate showed more restraint, but were just as aggressive and determined as their counterparts in the House to show the governor that she could not beat them at the political game.

There were exceptions in the Senate — some freshman Senators who don’t yet know how to keep their cool as the more experienced Senators seem to do, exposed themselves to questions as to their mental stability and ability to stay on subject and speak the truth.

Sen. Gary Hooser, D-Kauai, who tends to travel at light speed toward the Hooser twilight zone once he gets talking, attacked Republicans and said they abandoning the sick, poor, homeless, beaten and raped to fend for themselves because they would not subsidize duplicative or expanded government programs.

Though other Senators, such as Sen. Roz Baker, D-Maui, gave similar biting speeches, Hooser leads the pack in the ability to get so carried away that he loses sight of reality and gets into fantasy.

Political observers note that this trait is bound to get him into hot water with his constituents, and say that they believe his Senate career will be short lived — like one more year.

”Happy Ending for the Taxpayer?”

If this were a happily ever after story for the majority of people in Hawaii, it would end with Democrats in the Legislature checking themselves into a shopperaholics anonymous clinic until they learned to control their raging spending habits that are based on emotion rather than logic.

They’d have to take a lie detector test in order to determine if they truly believe the stories they spew to the people of the Hawaii. The stories such as the often repeated one about people (substitute any of the following: homeless, children, elderly, sick, beaten, raped, drug addicts) who will die, live on the street, trade sex for food, take drugs and commit crimes, should taxpayers not give even more of their hard-earned money.

Some would pass the test, but many would not. Some legislators actually do believe the $3.5 million will create a “safety net” and want the governor to raid from the rainy day fund under SB 1305. They are caring, compassionate Democrats who have fallen for the best stories told by the non-profits directors who are better at storytelling, then working to fundraise from private and federal sources.

Sen. Suzanne Chun Oakland, D-Nuuanu, for example, bursts into tears, real tears, nearly every time she talks about people she feels are less fortunate. To her credit, she is not a callous politician, but she does need to check out if she is being duped by wise fundraisers and follow the money to see if it is going where it should.

Sen. Colleen Hanbusa, D-Waianae, says she is a Democrat and believes people should receive handouts and subsidies. She is one of the few Democrats in leadership who votes on occasion against the other majority leaders and for what she believes. She was the only Democrat to vote against binding arbitration for the public sector unions.

But bottom line is the state only has so much money and it is all gone and no amount of tears will bring back that money.

Much more than is available has been spent by the previous governor and legislators and the Council on Revenues estimates an additional $150 million shortfall that will make balancing the budget even more difficult.

”Awakening the Sleeping Giant – the Hawaii Taxpayer”

Though people in Hawaii are slow to anger, once they are hurt or insulted, they remember the incident and the culprit. And despite what many politicians and political operatives think, they are not stupid.

Democrats awakened many observers with this charade, even some in their own party, who watched the special session in person or on television and were disgusted by what they saw.

They knew the special session was not held for the benefit of the general public, even though Democrats, through a fake series of hearings with their cheerleader supporters, tried to make it appear that way.

Unlike the special session in 2000, which at insistence of the general public led to the override of Gov. Benjamin Cayetano’s veto of a bill that raised the age of sexual consent to 16, the 2003 session was strictly for political, not moral, purposes, and at the public’s expense.

”’Send any tittle or tattle you might have to Malia Zimmerman at”’ mailto:Malia@HawaiiReporter.com ”’Send complaints elsewhere. Compliments and news tips accepted here.”’

“Malia Lt Blue top Image”

”Come on Democrats, Just ‘Fess Up: The Special Session was Just a Show”

Democrats should just admit the Tuesday, July 8 special session at the Hawaii state Legislature was really a show — a pro-wrestling match between Hawaii’s two major political parties.

They should be honest and say they wanted to flex their muscles and give the Republicans a good, old-fashioned whupping.

Because give a whupping they did.

They showed with 20 of 25 seats in the Senate and 36 of 51 in the House that they could put Hawaii’s new Republican governor in her place and override 6 of the 50 vetoes.

They showed her who is boss.

And they showed they don’t mind breaking their own code of honor and long-standing tradition of not overriding a governor’s fiscal vetoes — a tradition to which they’ve adhered without exception over the last 40 years while Democrat governors have been in power.

There is only one problem. Democrats forgot something really important when they set up these theatrics.

Sure they had their cheerleaders — including professional fundraisers not competent enough or just too lazy to get funds privately, even after Lingle’s cabinet offered to help them, and so sought state government grant subsidies.

They had their Korean War Veterans in uniform who were told to show up to protest Gov. Linda Lingle’s veto of $30,000 for their 50th commemoration celebration. This despite the fact they already received a $90,000 appropriation, and the fact that the governor’s cabinet has helped raise $18,000 more and pledged to get $12,000 more so the celebration will go on.

They also had their bread and butter public union thugs waiting in the wings.

What a wonderful picture they made sitting together in benches above the Senate and House arenas.

But again, Democrats forgot something important, something essential to their end victory.

They forgot their audience.

They forgot all the people of Hawaii were watching to see what kind of performance they’d give. To see if they’d have good sportsmanship, play fair and be in the fight with true passion or just for show and to make them look superior.

At the conclusion of the match, although Democrats won all six rounds, overriding six of the governor’s vetoes, they lost many of their fans.

And though the special interest cheerleaders might help the Democrats in their electioneering, it is all the fans who really count on Election Day in 2004.

”Special Session Unorganized, Not Thought Out”

It seemed as if Democrat leadership in the Legislature was just “winging it” during the special session.

In the early minutes of the Senate session, proper procedure was not being followed. There was no “Order of the Day” for senators and members of the public to follow, so no one knew which bills were up for discussion. Then when the first version of the Order of the Day was passed out, it simply said “vetoes” and did not list the bills up for consideration.

The House, confused by the Senate’s disorganization, simply printed all 50 of the governor’s vetoes on its Order of the Day, to ensure they would override the same bills as the Senate did.

Also, the Senate Democrat leadership neglected to tell the Republican minority that there was a special session on Tuesday or what bills would be challenged.

House minority leaders say they had to attend Democrat press conferences with the media in order to find out what time they were supposed to be in session and what bills might be covered.

Minority Republicans say these were not oversights, rather intentional acts to prevent real debate and a truly good legislative agenda from moving forward.

”Several Mistakes Expose Democrats for False Session”

At a July 7 press conference, Senate President Robert Bunda and House Speaker Calvin Say told Hawaii media they were calling a special session to ensure the “health, welfare and safety of the people of Hawaii.”

They said they disagreed with the governor’s statement that she ensured no safety nets were broken for those in need and that subsidies she vetoed to specific charities were duplicative or expanded services.

But as soon as the session started, it seems Democrat leaders forgot their pledge, and instead overturned six bills, four of which had nothing to do with what they termed “health and welfare.”

*The first bill they tackled was to give the Korean War veterans $30,000 for their 50th anniversary celebration, a bill that had nothing to do with health or welfare. Democrats insisted their support of this bill made them “patriotic” and Republicans “not patriotic” which of course caused a huge ruckus. Republicans pointed out the governor vetoed the $30,000 because her cabinet took the initiative to help raise the money privately and already has had success, raising $18,000 and negotiating with the city to have fees waived to make up the remaining $12,000.

*Another bill they overrode had nothing to do with health and welfare. Democrats sided with the public sector unions in overriding the governor’s veto of binding arbitration, which allows union leaders to avoid strikes and instead rely on a decision by three arbitrators on one panel as to what their salary increases should be. The governor, Republican legislators and Sen. Colleen Hanabusa, D-Waianae, voted against binding arbitration because the arbitrator does not have to use as a criteria what the state can afford. In other words, union leaders get to charge as much as the arbitration panel of three says on the state’s credit card and the taxpayers have to find a way to pay it back. Typically unions get much higher increases under binding arbitration, usually double digit increases, with little or no effort or risk, while taxpayers are bound to foot the bill.

*A third bill again had nothing to do with health and welfare, rather with agricultural land in Hawaii and zoning of that land. Saying they had the farmers beating down their door, Democrats voted to override the governor’s veto of SB 255, relating to agriculture. The governor originally planned to sign the bill saying it was “worthy,” but it was technically flawed according to the state attorney general, so she asked Legislators to fix the bill and send it to her in the next session. Democrats refused and overrode her veto, also turning down an amendment proposed by Republicans and approved by the governor that would have fixed the flaws. Now, as is, the governor and her staff says there will be “unintended adverse consequences.”

*A fourth bill they overrode had nothing to do with health and welfare, rather with power and money. With the power of the highly respected state auditor behind them, Democrat legislators authorized the auditor to audit any agency in the administrative branch and charge the agency for it. The governor argued the bill invites duplication and waste of limited resources for the many departments that must budget for and schedule their own audits.

Bills five and six can be argued as “health and welfare bills,” though Republicans argue these are duplicative subsidies or expanded services the state cannot afford.

*Democrats voted to override the governor’s veto of SB 745 relating to emergency medical services. This bill requires the Department of Health to establish, administer and maintain an aeromedical emergency medical services system statewide, but the attorney general argued the bill opens the state to liability because it is written with the term “statewide” but only is intended to serve Maui county. The governor also said the state cannot afford the $1 million it will take to start up the service. Republicans argued the service will not save even one life anyway this year as it is not set to start until July 2004. But Democrats disagreed with the arguments by the governor, the attorney general and Republicans, saying by 2004 the state will be able to afford the $1 million and will not face additional liability issues.

*Democrats also raided the Rainy Day Fund to give more handouts and subsidies to the charities and non-profits that support them. Specifically Democrats voted to raid the state’s emergency fund — the rainy day fund — for $3.5 million to pay for services they deemed necessary, despite the fact that the governor’s human services and health directors made sure all essential services not new, expanded or duplicative were covered. The governor was forced to choose between making cuts to SB 1305 or raiding the state’s special fund because the budget she received from the Legislature was short $152 million thanks to a revenue projection shortfall announced by the council on revenues after the session closed May 1.

”Nasty Attitudes, Harsh Words Fly at Legislature”

Many House Democrats brought their nasty faces, snide voices and prewritten canned scripts to the session and took direction from a public relations flak cueing them from the sidelines.

House Speaker Calvin Say had to act like a disciplinarian father presiding over bratty children who would not listen and kept talking back. Several times during heated discussions, Democrats got down and dirty, launching personal attacks on the governor and her Republican counterparts. In several cases, the Representatives got so out of control that the House speaker had to call a recess and a caucus with Democrats.

Rep. Marcus Oshiro, D-Wahiawa, called the governor brainless and heartless, despite loud protests from Republicans and a good scolding from Rep. Cynthia Thielen who got in his face for the comments. This exchange led Say to call another recess and an eventual apology from Oshiro.

Rep. Michael Kahikina, D-Waianae, called Republicans and the governor “unpatriotic” for refusing to allocate $30,000 to the Korean War veterans for their 50th celebration, even though the governor’s appointees were successfully helping organizers raise the money privately.

Democrats in the Senate showed more restraint, but were just as aggressive and determined as their counterparts in the House to show the governor that she could not beat them at the political game.

There were exceptions in the Senate — some freshman Senators who don’t yet know how to keep their cool as the more experienced Senators seem to do, exposed themselves to questions as to their mental stability and ability to stay on subject and speak the truth.

Sen. Gary Hooser, D-Kauai, who tends to travel at light speed toward the Hooser twilight zone once he gets talking, attacked Republicans and said they abandoning the sick, poor, homeless, beaten and raped to fend for themselves because they would not subsidize duplicative or expanded government programs.

Though other Senators, such as Sen. Roz Baker, D-Maui, gave similar biting speeches, Hooser leads the pack in the ability to get so carried away that he loses sight of reality and gets into fantasy.

Political observers note that this trait is bound to get him into hot water with his constituents, and say that they believe his Senate career will be short lived — like one more year.

”Happy Ending for the Taxpayer?”

If this were a happily ever after story for the majority of people in Hawaii, it would end with Democrats in the Legislature checking themselves into a shopperaholics anonymous clinic until they learned to control their raging spending habits that are based on emotion rather than logic.

They’d have to take a lie detector test in order to determine if they truly believe the stories they spew to the people of the Hawaii. The stories such as the often repeated one about people (substitute any of the following: homeless, children, elderly, sick, beaten, raped, drug addicts) who will die, live on the street, trade sex for food, take drugs and commit crimes, should taxpayers not give even more of their hard-earned money.

Some would pass the test, but many would not. Some legislators actually do believe the $3.5 million will create a “safety net” and want the governor to raid from the rainy day fund under SB 1305. They are caring, compassionate Democrats who have fallen for the best stories told by the non-profits directors who are better at storytelling, then working to fundraise from private and federal sources.

Sen. Suzanne Chun Oakland, D-Nuuanu, for example, bursts into tears, real tears, nearly every time she talks about people she feels are less fortunate. To her credit, she is not a callous politician, but she does need to check out if she is being duped by wise fundraisers and follow the money to see if it is going where it should.

Sen. Colleen Hanbusa, D-Waianae, says she is a Democrat and believes people should receive handouts and subsidies. She is one of the few Democrats in leadership who votes on occasion against the other majority leaders and for what she believes. She was the only Democrat to vote against binding arbitration for the public sector unions.

But bottom line is the state only has so much money and it is all gone and no amount of tears will bring back that money.

Much more than is available has been spent by the previous governor and legislators and the Council on Revenues estimates an additional $150 million shortfall that will make balancing the budget even more difficult.

”Awakening the Sleeping Giant – the Hawaii Taxpayer”

Though people in Hawaii are slow to anger, once they are hurt or insulted, they remember the incident and the culprit. And despite what many politicians and political operatives think, they are not stupid.

Democrats awakened many observers with this charade, even some in their own party, who watched the special session in person or on television and were disgusted by what they saw.

They knew the special session was not held for the benefit of the general public, even though Democrats, through a fake series of hearings with their cheerleader supporters, tried to make it appear that way.

Unlike the special session in 2000, which at insistence of the general public led to the override of Gov. Benjamin Cayetano’s veto of a bill that raised the age of sexual consent to 16, the 2003 session was strictly for political, not moral, purposes, and at the public’s expense.

”’Send any tittle or tattle you might have to Malia Zimmerman at”’ mailto:Malia@HawaiiReporter.com ”’Send complaints elsewhere. Compliments and news tips accepted here.”’

“Malia Lt Blue top Image”

”Come on Democrats, Just ‘Fess Up: The Special Session was Just a Show”

Democrats should just admit the Tuesday, July 8 special session at the Hawaii state Legislature was really a show — a pro-wrestling match between Hawaii’s two major political parties.

They should be honest and say they wanted to flex their muscles and give the Republicans a good, old-fashioned whupping.

Because give a whupping they did.

They showed with 20 of 25 seats in the Senate and 36 of 51 in the House that they could put Hawaii’s new Republican governor in her place and override 6 of the 50 vetoes.

They showed her who is boss.

And they showed they don’t mind breaking their own code of honor and long-standing tradition of not overriding a governor’s fiscal vetoes — a tradition to which they’ve adhered without exception over the last 40 years while Democrat governors have been in power.

There is only one problem. Democrats forgot something really important when they set up these theatrics.

Sure they had their cheerleaders — including professional fundraisers not competent enough or just too lazy to get funds privately, even after Lingle’s cabinet offered to help them, and so sought state government grant subsidies.

They had their Korean War Veterans in uniform who were told to show up to protest Gov. Linda Lingle’s veto of $30,000 for their 50th commemoration celebration. This despite the fact they already received a $90,000 appropriation, and the fact that the governor’s cabinet has helped raise $18,000 more and pledged to get $12,000 more so the celebration will go on.

They also had their bread and butter public union thugs waiting in the wings.

What a wonderful picture they made sitting together in benches above the Senate and House arenas.

But again, Democrats forgot something important, something essential to their end victory.

They forgot their audience.

They forgot all the people of Hawaii were watching to see what kind of performance they’d give. To see if they’d have good sportsmanship, play fair and be in the fight with true passion or just for show and to make them look superior.

At the conclusion of the match, although Democrats won all six rounds, overriding six of the governor’s vetoes, they lost many of their fans.

And though the special interest cheerleaders might help the Democrats in their electioneering, it is all the fans who really count on Election Day in 2004.

”Special Session Unorganized, Not Thought Out”

It seemed as if Democrat leadership in the Legislature was just “winging it” during the special session.

In the early minutes of the Senate session, proper procedure was not being followed. There was no “Order of the Day” for senators and members of the public to follow, so no one knew which bills were up for discussion. Then when the first version of the Order of the Day was passed out, it simply said “vetoes” and did not list the bills up for consideration.

The House, confused by the Senate’s disorganization, simply printed all 50 of the governor’s vetoes on its Order of the Day, to ensure they would override the same bills as the Senate did.

Also, the Senate Democrat leadership neglected to tell the Republican minority that there was a special session on Tuesday or what bills would be challenged.

House minority leaders say they had to attend Democrat press conferences with the media in order to find out what time they were supposed to be in session and what bills might be covered.

Minority Republicans say these were not oversights, rather intentional acts to prevent real debate and a truly good legislative agenda from moving forward.

”Several Mistakes Expose Democrats for False Session”

At a July 7 press conference, Senate President Robert Bunda and House Speaker Calvin Say told Hawaii media they were calling a special session to ensure the “health, welfare and safety of the people of Hawaii.”

They said they disagreed with the governor’s statement that she ensured no safety nets were broken for those in need and that subsidies she vetoed to specific charities were duplicative or expanded services.

But as soon as the session started, it seems Democrat leaders forgot their pledge, and instead overturned six bills, four of which had nothing to do with what they termed “health and welfare.”

*The first bill they tackled was to give the Korean War veterans $30,000 for their 50th anniversary celebration, a bill that had nothing to do with health or welfare. Democrats insisted their support of this bill made them “patriotic” and Republicans “not patriotic” which of course caused a huge ruckus. Republicans pointed out the governor vetoed the $30,000 because her cabinet took the initiative to help raise the money privately and already has had success, raising $18,000 and negotiating with the city to have fees waived to make up the remaining $12,000.

*Another bill they overrode had nothing to do with health and welfare. Democrats sided with the public sector unions in overriding the governor’s veto of binding arbitration, which allows union leaders to avoid strikes and instead rely on a decision by three arbitrators on one panel as to what their salary increases should be. The governor, Republican legislators and Sen. Colleen Hanabusa, D-Waianae, voted against binding arbitration because the arbitrator does not have to use as a criteria what the state can afford. In other words, union leaders get to charge as much as the arbitration panel of three says on the state’s credit card and the taxpayers have to find a way to pay it back. Typically unions get much higher increases under binding arbitration, usually double digit increases, with little or no effort or risk, while taxpayers are bound to foot the bill.

*A third bill again had nothing to do with health and welfare, rather with agricultural land in Hawaii and zoning of that land. Saying they had the farmers beating down their door, Democrats voted to override the governor’s veto of SB 255, relating to agriculture. The governor originally planned to sign the bill saying it was “worthy,” but it was technically flawed according to the state attorney general, so she asked Legislators to fix the bill and send it to her in the next session. Democrats refused and overrode her veto, also turning down an amendment proposed by Republicans and approved by the governor that would have fixed the flaws. Now, as is, the governor and her staff says there will be “unintended adverse consequences.”

*A fourth bill they overrode had nothing to do with health and welfare, rather with power and money. With the power of the highly respected state auditor behind them, Democrat legislators authorized the auditor to audit any agency in the administrative branch and charge the agency for it. The governor argued the bill invites duplication and waste of limited resources for the many departments that must budget for and schedule their own audits.

Bills five and six can be argued as “health and welfare bills,” though Republicans argue these are duplicative subsidies or expanded services the state cannot afford.

*Democrats voted to override the governor’s veto of SB 745 relating to emergency medical services. This bill requires the Department of Health to establish, administer and maintain an aeromedical emergency medical services system statewide, but the attorney general argued the bill opens the state to liability because it is written with the term “statewide” but only is intended to serve Maui county. The governor also said the state cannot afford the $1 million it will take to start up the service. Republicans argued the service will not save even one life anyway this year as it is not set to start until July 2004. But Democrats disagreed with the arguments by the governor, the attorney general and Republicans, saying by 2004 the state will be able to afford the $1 million and will not face additional liability issues.

*Democrats also raided the Rainy Day Fund to give more handouts and subsidies to the charities and non-profits that support them. Specifically Democrats voted to raid the state’s emergency fund — the rainy day fund — for $3.5 million to pay for services they deemed necessary, despite the fact that the governor’s human services and health directors made sure all essential services not new, expanded or duplicative were covered. The governor was forced to choose between making cuts to SB 1305 or raiding the state’s special fund because the budget she received from the Legislature was short $152 million thanks to a revenue projection shortfall announced by the council on revenues after the session closed May 1.

”Nasty Attitudes, Harsh Words Fly at Legislature”

Many House Democrats brought their nasty faces, snide voices and prewritten canned scripts to the session and took direction from a public relations flak cueing them from the sidelines.

House Speaker Calvin Say had to act like a disciplinarian father presiding over bratty children who would not listen and kept talking back. Several times during heated discussions, Democrats got down and dirty, launching personal attacks on the governor and her Republican counterparts. In several cases, the Representatives got so out of control that the House speaker had to call a recess and a caucus with Democrats.

Rep. Marcus Oshiro, D-Wahiawa, called the governor brainless and heartless, despite loud protests from Republicans and a good scolding from Rep. Cynthia Thielen who got in his face for the comments. This exchange led Say to call another recess and an eventual apology from Oshiro.

Rep. Michael Kahikina, D-Waianae, called Republicans and the governor “unpatriotic” for refusing to allocate $30,000 to the Korean War veterans for their 50th celebration, even though the governor’s appointees were successfully helping organizers raise the money privately.

Democrats in the Senate showed more restraint, but were just as aggressive and determined as their counterparts in the House to show the governor that she could not beat them at the political game.

There were exceptions in the Senate — some freshman Senators who don’t yet know how to keep their cool as the more experienced Senators seem to do, exposed themselves to questions as to their mental stability and ability to stay on subject and speak the truth.

Sen. Gary Hooser, D-Kauai, who tends to travel at light speed toward the Hooser twilight zone once he gets talking, attacked Republicans and said they abandoning the sick, poor, homeless, beaten and raped to fend for themselves because they would not subsidize duplicative or expanded government programs.

Though other Senators, such as Sen. Roz Baker, D-Maui, gave similar biting speeches, Hooser leads the pack in the ability to get so carried away that he loses sight of reality and gets into fantasy.

Political observers note that this trait is bound to get him into hot water with his constituents, and say that they believe his Senate career will be short lived — like one more year.

”Happy Ending for the Taxpayer?”

If this were a happily ever after story for the majority of people in Hawaii, it would end with Democrats in the Legislature checking themselves into a shopperaholics anonymous clinic until they learned to control their raging spending habits that are based on emotion rather than logic.

They’d have to take a lie detector test in order to determine if they truly believe the stories they spew to the people of the Hawaii. The stories such as the often repeated one about people (substitute any of the following: homeless, children, elderly, sick, beaten, raped, drug addicts) who will die, live on the street, trade sex for food, take drugs and commit crimes, should taxpayers not give even more of their hard-earned money.

Some would pass the test, but many would not. Some legislators actually do believe the $3.5 million will create a “safety net” and want the governor to raid from the rainy day fund under SB 1305. They are caring, compassionate Democrats who have fallen for the best stories told by the non-profits directors who are better at storytelling, then working to fundraise from private and federal sources.

Sen. Suzanne Chun Oakland, D-Nuuanu, for example, bursts into tears, real tears, nearly every time she talks about people she feels are less fortunate. To her credit, she is not a callous politician, but she does need to check out if she is being duped by wise fundraisers and follow the money to see if it is going where it should.

Sen. Colleen Hanbusa, D-Waianae, says she is a Democrat and believes people should receive handouts and subsidies. She is one of the few Democrats in leadership who votes on occasion against the other majority leaders and for what she believes. She was the only Democrat to vote against binding arbitration for the public sector unions.

But bottom line is the state only has so much money and it is all gone and no amount of tears will bring back that money.

Much more than is available has been spent by the previous governor and legislators and the Council on Revenues estimates an additional $150 million shortfall that will make balancing the budget even more difficult.

”Awakening the Sleeping Giant – the Hawaii Taxpayer”

Though people in Hawaii are slow to anger, once they are hurt or insulted, they remember the incident and the culprit. And despite what many politicians and political operatives think, they are not stupid.

Democrats awakened many observers with this charade, even some in their own party, who watched the special session in person or on television and were disgusted by what they saw.

They knew the special session was not held for the benefit of the general public, even though Democrats, through a fake series of hearings with their cheerleader supporters, tried to make it appear that way.

Unlike the special session in 2000, which at insistence of the general public led to the override of Gov. Benjamin Cayetano’s veto of a bill that raised the age of sexual consent to 16, the 2003 session was strictly for political, not moral, purposes, and at the public’s expense.

”’Send any tittle or tattle you might have to Malia Zimmerman at”’ mailto:Malia@HawaiiReporter.com ”’Send complaints elsewhere. Compliments and news tips accepted here.”’

“Malia Lt Blue top Image”

”Come on Democrats, Just ‘Fess Up: The Special Session was Just a Show”

Democrats should just admit the Tuesday, July 8 special session at the Hawaii state Legislature was really a show — a pro-wrestling match between Hawaii’s two major political parties.

They should be honest and say they wanted to flex their muscles and give the Republicans a good, old-fashioned whupping.

Because give a whupping they did.

They showed with 20 of 25 seats in the Senate and 36 of 51 in the House that they could put Hawaii’s new Republican governor in her place and override 6 of the 50 vetoes.

They showed her who is boss.

And they showed they don’t mind breaking their own code of honor and long-standing tradition of not overriding a governor’s fiscal vetoes — a tradition to which they’ve adhered without exception over the last 40 years while Democrat governors have been in power.

There is only one problem. Democrats forgot something really important when they set up these theatrics.

Sure they had their cheerleaders — including professional fundraisers not competent enough or just too lazy to get funds privately, even after Lingle’s cabinet offered to help them, and so sought state government grant subsidies.

They had their Korean War Veterans in uniform who were told to show up to protest Gov. Linda Lingle’s veto of $30,000 for their 50th commemoration celebration. This despite the fact they already received a $90,000 appropriation, and the fact that the governor’s cabinet has helped raise $18,000 more and pledged to get $12,000 more so the celebration will go on.

They also had their bread and butter public union thugs waiting in the wings.

What a wonderful picture they made sitting together in benches above the Senate and House arenas.

But again, Democrats forgot something important, something essential to their end victory.

They forgot their audience.

They forgot all the people of Hawaii were watching to see what kind of performance they’d give. To see if they’d have good sportsmanship, play fair and be in the fight with true passion or just for show and to make them look superior.

At the conclusion of the match, although Democrats won all six rounds, overriding six of the governor’s vetoes, they lost many of their fans.

And though the special interest cheerleaders might help the Democrats in their electioneering, it is all the fans who really count on Election Day in 2004.

”Special Session Unorganized, Not Thought Out”

It seemed as if Democrat leadership in the Legislature was just “winging it” during the special session.

In the early minutes of the Senate session, proper procedure was not being followed. There was no “Order of the Day” for senators and members of the public to follow, so no one knew which bills were up for discussion. Then when the first version of the Order of the Day was passed out, it simply said “vetoes” and did not list the bills up for consideration.

The House, confused by the Senate’s disorganization, simply printed all 50 of the governor’s vetoes on its Order of the Day, to ensure they would override the same bills as the Senate did.

Also, the Senate Democrat leadership neglected to tell the Republican minority that there was a special session on Tuesday or what bills would be challenged.

House minority leaders say they had to attend Democrat press conferences with the media in order to find out what time they were supposed to be in session and what bills might be covered.

Minority Republicans say these were not oversights, rather intentional acts to prevent real debate and a truly good legislative agenda from moving forward.

”Several Mistakes Expose Democrats for False Session”

At a July 7 press conference, Senate President Robert Bunda and House Speaker Calvin Say told Hawaii media they were calling a special session to ensure the “health, welfare and safety of the people of Hawaii.”

They said they disagreed with the governor’s statement that she ensured no safety nets were broken for those in need and that subsidies she vetoed to specific charities were duplicative or expanded services.

But as soon as the session started, it seems Democrat leaders forgot their pledge, and instead overturned six bills, four of which had nothing to do with what they termed “health and welfare.”

*The first bill they tackled was to give the Korean War veterans $30,000 for their 50th anniversary celebration, a bill that had nothing to do with health or welfare. Democrats insisted their support of this bill made them “patriotic” and Republicans “not patriotic” which of course caused a huge ruckus. Republicans pointed out the governor vetoed the $30,000 because her cabinet took the initiative to help raise the money privately and already has had success, raising $18,000 and negotiating with the city to have fees waived to make up the remaining $12,000.

*Another bill they overrode had nothing to do with health and welfare. Democrats sided with the public sector unions in overriding the governor’s veto of binding arbitration, which allows union leaders to avoid strikes and instead rely on a decision by three arbitrators on one panel as to what their salary increases should be. The governor, Republican legislators and Sen. Colleen Hanabusa, D-Waianae, voted against binding arbitration because the arbitrator does not have to use as a criteria what the state can afford. In other words, union leaders get to charge as much as the arbitration panel of three says on the state’s credit card and the taxpayers have to find a way to pay it back. Typically unions get much higher increases under binding arbitration, usually double digit increases, with little or no effort or risk, while taxpayers are bound to foot the bill.

*A third bill again had nothing to do with health and welfare, rather with agricultural land in Hawaii and zoning of that land. Saying they had the farmers beating down their door, Democrats voted to override the governor’s veto of SB 255, relating to agriculture. The governor originally planned to sign the bill saying it was “worthy,” but it was technically flawed according to the state attorney general, so she asked Legislators to fix the bill and send it to her in the next session. Democrats refused and overrode her veto, also turning down an amendment proposed by Republicans and approved by the governor that would have fixed the flaws. Now, as is, the governor and her staff says there will be “unintended adverse consequences.”

*A fourth bill they overrode had nothing to do with health and welfare, rather with power and money. With the power of the highly respected state auditor behind them, Democrat legislators authorized the auditor to audit any agency in the administrative branch and charge the agency for it. The governor argued the bill invites duplication and waste of limited resources for the many departments that must budget for and schedule their own audits.

Bills five and six can be argued as “health and welfare bills,” though Republicans argue these are duplicative subsidies or expanded services the state cannot afford.

*Democrats voted to override the governor’s veto of SB 745 relating to emergency medical services. This bill requires the Department of Health to establish, administer and maintain an aeromedical emergency medical services system statewide, but the attorney general argued the bill opens the state to liability because it is written with the term “statewide” but only is intended to serve Maui county. The governor also said the state cannot afford the $1 million it will take to start up the service. Republicans argued the service will not save even one life anyway this year as it is not set to start until July 2004. But Democrats disagreed with the arguments by the governor, the attorney general and Republicans, saying by 2004 the state will be able to afford the $1 million and will not face additional liability issues.

*Democrats also raided the Rainy Day Fund to give more handouts and subsidies to the charities and non-profits that support them. Specifically Democrats voted to raid the state’s emergency fund — the rainy day fund — for $3.5 million to pay for services they deemed necessary, despite the fact that the governor’s human services and health directors made sure all essential services not new, expanded or duplicative were covered. The governor was forced to choose between making cuts to SB 1305 or raiding the state’s special fund because the budget she received from the Legislature was short $152 million thanks to a revenue projection shortfall announced by the council on revenues after the session closed May 1.

”Nasty Attitudes, Harsh Words Fly at Legislature”

Many House Democrats brought their nasty faces, snide voices and prewritten canned scripts to the session and took direction from a public relations flak cueing them from the sidelines.

House Speaker Calvin Say had to act like a disciplinarian father presiding over bratty children who would not listen and kept talking back. Several times during heated discussions, Democrats got down and dirty, launching personal attacks on the governor and her Republican counterparts. In several cases, the Representatives got so out of control that the House speaker had to call a recess and a caucus with Democrats.

Rep. Marcus Oshiro, D-Wahiawa, called the governor brainless and heartless, despite loud protests from Republicans and a good scolding from Rep. Cynthia Thielen who got in his face for the comments. This exchange led Say to call another recess and an eventual apology from Oshiro.

Rep. Michael Kahikina, D-Waianae, called Republicans and the governor “unpatriotic” for refusing to allocate $30,000 to the Korean War veterans for their 50th celebration, even though the governor’s appointees were successfully helping organizers raise the money privately.

Democrats in the Senate showed more restraint, but were just as aggressive and determined as their counterparts in the House to show the governor that she could not beat them at the political game.

There were exceptions in the Senate — some freshman Senators who don’t yet know how to keep their cool as the more experienced Senators seem to do, exposed themselves to questions as to their mental stability and ability to stay on subject and speak the truth.

Sen. Gary Hooser, D-Kauai, who tends to travel at light speed toward the Hooser twilight zone once he gets talking, attacked Republicans and said they abandoning the sick, poor, homeless, beaten and raped to fend for themselves because they would not subsidize duplicative or expanded government programs.

Though other Senators, such as Sen. Roz Baker, D-Maui, gave similar biting speeches, Hooser leads the pack in the ability to get so carried away that he loses sight of reality and gets into fantasy.

Political observers note that this trait is bound to get him into hot water with his constituents, and say that they believe his Senate career will be short lived — like one more year.

”Happy Ending for the Taxpayer?”

If this were a happily ever after story for the majority of people in Hawaii, it would end with Democrats in the Legislature checking themselves into a shopperaholics anonymous clinic until they learned to control their raging spending habits that are based on emotion rather than logic.

They’d have to take a lie detector test in order to determine if they truly believe the stories they spew to the people of the Hawaii. The stories such as the often repeated one about people (substitute any of the following: homeless, children, elderly, sick, beaten, raped, drug addicts) who will die, live on the street, trade sex for food, take drugs and commit crimes, should taxpayers not give even more of their hard-earned money.

Some would pass the test, but many would not. Some legislators actually do believe the $3.5 million will create a “safety net” and want the governor to raid from the rainy day fund under SB 1305. They are caring, compassionate Democrats who have fallen for the best stories told by the non-profits directors who are better at storytelling, then working to fundraise from private and federal sources.

Sen. Suzanne Chun Oakland, D-Nuuanu, for example, bursts into tears, real tears, nearly every time she talks about people she feels are less fortunate. To her credit, she is not a callous politician, but she does need to check out if she is being duped by wise fundraisers and follow the money to see if it is going where it should.

Sen. Colleen Hanbusa, D-Waianae, says she is a Democrat and believes people should receive handouts and subsidies. She is one of the few Democrats in leadership who votes on occasion against the other majority leaders and for what she believes. She was the only Democrat to vote against binding arbitration for the public sector unions.

But bottom line is the state only has so much money and it is all gone and no amount of tears will bring back that money.

Much more than is available has been spent by the previous governor and legislators and the Council on Revenues estimates an additional $150 million shortfall that will make balancing the budget even more difficult.

”Awakening the Sleeping Giant – the Hawaii Taxpayer”

Though people in Hawaii are slow to anger, once they are hurt or insulted, they remember the incident and the culprit. And despite what many politicians and political operatives think, they are not stupid.

Democrats awakened many observers with this charade, even some in their own party, who watched the special session in person or on television and were disgusted by what they saw.

They knew the special session was not held for the benefit of the general public, even though Democrats, through a fake series of hearings with their cheerleader supporters, tried to make it appear that way.

Unlike the special session in 2000, which at insistence of the general public led to the override of Gov. Benjamin Cayetano’s veto of a bill that raised the age of sexual consent to 16, the 2003 session was strictly for political, not moral, purposes, and at the public’s expense.

”’Send any tittle or tattle you might have to Malia Zimmerman at”’ mailto:Malia@HawaiiReporter.com ”’Send complaints elsewhere. Compliments and news tips accepted here.”’

“Kawamoto on Segway Centered”

”Kawamoto Gets Segway; Get Out of the Way”

Chair of the Senate Transportation Committee Cal Kawamoto, D-Waipahu, now is the proud owner of a Segway, that is the fancy scooter with handlebars, large wheels and a base to stand on that glides smoothly and quietly from place to place.

The scooters, valued at more than $5,000, were first brought to Hawaii two years ago and introduced at the Hawaii State Capitol. Kawamoto was the first to try out the scooter and based on his performance that day, and the subsequent law he helped pass allowing them on the sidewalk, a warning to pedestrians: Watch out and get out of the way!

His model is rumored to be a custom model — with a basket on the front to hold campaign materials and moneybags on the back to hold checks from his campaign fund to charities.

”Hawaii Media Should Not Throw First Stone at KITV”

At a time when media ethics are being questioned nationally, Hawaii is having its own debate over what media should accept and not accept in terms of gifts, freebees and compensation.

There is supposed to be a line between news, public relations and advertising, though that line often is blurred or removed all together, especially when it comes to the influence big advertisers and big government have over the media.

The debate over media “ethics” is now focused on KITV (ABC affiliate) because the management accepted two all expense paid trips to Japan this week for a reporter and cameraman sponsored by the Hawaii Visitors and Convention Bureau. The HVCB wanted a Hawaii media to document Gov. Linda Lingle’s public relations effort and tourism recruitment effort in Japan. ”’The Honolulu Star-Bulletin”’ also was offered the deal, but declined. The general manager of KITV, after a number of negative press stories, said KITV would refund the money to the state.

But the subject did not drop there. Democrats took the opportunity to slam the governor. House Speaker Calvin Say said the HVCB should never have funded the trip, and blamed the governor for the media mess.

The governor’s chief of staff, Bob Awana, responded in a written statement from Japan saying he is “disappointed that the Senate President and House Speaker would knowingly make false statements.”

“The costs for the KITV news crew are the responsibility of the station and/or HVCB, and not the Governor’s Office. They are simply trying to distract the public from the real issues, which are the Governor’s efforts to promote Hawaii’s tourism, stimulate the economy, and exercise strict fiscal discipline,”Awana says.

Other media harped on KITV’s lack of ethics and in fact covered the fact they weren’t invited on an all expense paid trip as a news story.

Sure, KITV should have paid for its own trip, but the other media cannot throw the first stone. Hawaii media takes freebees all the time.

In the name of full disclosure, when I freelanced for ”’Midweek,”’ the U.S. Army paid for me to go to Ft. Polk in Louisiana to watch the men and women from Hawaii’s 25th infantry division prepare for a peacekeeping mission in Bosnia.

But I was not the only one on an all expense paid trip to the muddy cold banks of Louisiana. KHON, KITV, KGMB and KHNL sent reporters and cameramen on the trip at the Army’s expense. The Honolulu Star-Bulletin also sent a reporter and cameraman. The only media not to accept the trip was ”’The Honolulu Advertiser.”’

In return, the military did expect positive coverage for Hawaii’s troops, which was given to them. Yes they deserved the positive coverage and the whole operation was impressive and captivating. But the military public relations officer was extremely strict with what questions could and could not be asked, and that put a big damper on interviews with America’s military leaders.

The main person being protected was Hawaii’s own General Eric K. Shinseki. Hawaii reporters on the trip, who were invited to a small reception and press conference at his home, were not allowed to ask him any questions relating to his job or the Sept. 11 terrorism attack on America and only could ask him personal softball questions.

The trip was well planned by Hawaii’s Army, but the mainstream in Hawaii’s media, with the exception of The Honolulu Advertiser, did accept a free trip and lodging and in fact, had plans to go to Bosnia on the Army’s dollar last August for two weeks.

So the bottom line is the only media with the right to criticize KITV for accepting the trip is ”’The Honolulu Advertiser,”’ as long as its editors and publishers were consistent in its policy not to accept big freebees.

”Celebrating America’s Second Amendment”

Hawaii’s National Riffle Association sponsored a fantastic event last week — the 2003 Public Shooting Sports Fair — at the Koko Head Shooting Complex. Many of Hawaii’s families attended.

Children were presented with Eddie Eagle safety messages and materials and earplugs. The adults and organizers dressed in costume according to what booth they visited.

For those people who believe firearms are not sports or family related, they should stop reading the mass media and attend one of these HRA events. Safety and proper handling of all firearms always is the first consideration at every booth and with every coach there. The experience is invaluable for those who attend.

And there was an abundance of events for families to try such clay sport shooting, archery, air guns, antiques, trap, skeet, cowboy guns, black powder muzzleloaders, action pistols, hunting firearms, bullseye pistols, high power rifles, military small arms, silhouette shooting and many others.

In one area, the American Living History section, participants dressed in historic American military uniforms from as far back as the Revolutionary War.

Max Cooper, the legislative spokesman for the Hawaii Rifle Association, had a costume from the Revolutionary War along with an authentic black powder rifle with a musket and an ax. He allowed me to shoot it. No I did not hit the target, but was close. The experience, however, gave me a glimpse at how difficult it must have been to fight with such weapons more than 200 years ago.

In the western section I had more success. Under the guidance of Ron “Clell” Miller and the Single Action Shooters of Hawaii Club, I hit the targets with an 1871 open top colt, 38 caliber, and an 1873 Colt Army Black Powder Original. These were genuine cowboy guns like the ones Clint Eastwood uses in his Western movies The club was just written up in Gun World Magazine.

Then on to another booth where I was coached by Ian Onaga of the Midpacific Pistol League. There I hit every one of the 12 targets I aimed for with a 9 millimeter and 44 magnum. Now that is packing power.

There is nothing more important for women then to know how to protect themselves. Attending firearms fairs or classes can go along way to empowering women as well as men and in teaching people of all ages about safety.

See the schedule for future HRA events on its Web site linked to on HawaiiReporter.com’s front page.

”New Laws on the Books”

Gov. Linda Lingle signed bills from the 2003 Legislature into laws this week, including one controversial bill that allows pharmacists to write prescriptions for the morning after or abortion pills. Being that the governor is pro-choice, this is not a surprise. But many of her supporters were angered over her support of the bill. The governor earlier vetoed a related bill that would mandate Hawaii’s hospitals dispense the morning after pill to sexually assaulted female victims. She vetoed this bill because it mandated the act, and St. Francis Medical Center, a Catholic hospital, says it is against the Catholic religion to do so and would not comply.

Here is a list of the bills signed most recently:

*RELATING TO THE OFFICE OF HAWAIIAN AFFAIRS, SB1156 provides that the Office of Hawaiian Affairs shall establish and maintain a registry of all Hawaiians wherever such persons may reside and provides that inclusion in the Hawaiian registry shall be based upon genealogical records sufficient to establish the person’s descent from the aboriginal people inhabiting the Hawaiian Islands in 1778.

*SB254 SD2 HD1 CD1 (ACT 218), RELATING TO AGRICULTURE, amends an existing appropriation of capital improvement funds to provide for the demolition of the bridge in the Puukapu Homesteads, Second Series Puukapu, South Kohala, Island of Hawaii, and the construction of a new bridge.

*SB773 HD2 (ACT 219), RELATING TO UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE, requires the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, under certain conditions, to make a re-determination of entitlement for unemployment insurance benefits using an alternative base period, thereby allowing more people to qualify for the benefits.

*SB1326 SD1 HD1 (ACT 220), RELATING TO EDUCATION, conforms HRS to the Hawaii Content and Performance Standards test, by allowing the DOE to adopt a program which provides opportunities for students to develop competency in a second language.

*HB857 SD2 7 (ACT 221), RELATING TO CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES, requires the governor to accept public comments for a period of 60 days if an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement is required for a proposed site or for the expansion of an existing in-state correctional facility.

”Washington Times Report Focuses on Hawaii’s Strategic Location”

The Washington Times in its July 9 edition says U.S. and North Korea officials met in Bangkok yesterday to discuss access to American defectors living in North Korea — part of a 7-year effort to account for U.S. soldiers who never returned from the Korean War.

Gov. Linda Lingle is quoted in the article saying she has been approached by the Pentagon about relocating to Pearl Harbor a “striker brigade” for rapid forward deployment to deal with North Korean threats and terrorist moves in East Asia.

In an interview with the Japanese news agency Kyodo Lingle says the brigade would consist of an aircraft carrier, advanced transport aircraft and other strategic resources.

The Pentagon has brought up “the forward deployment of more resources to Hawaii, such as a carrier group or a striker brigade, moving C-17s into Hawaii, more aircraft,” Lingle says.

The Times reports a striker brigade is a more mobile group that can get to a theater a lot faster than conventional forces. “The Pentagon would not confirm that specific plan, saying only that the administration’s new defense strategy calls for restructuring of the U.S. “global posture because of the different security environment,” the Times reports.

See the full story at

https://www.washingtontimes.com/world/20030708-110230-4544r.htm

”QVC TV Shopping Network Holds National Product Search”

QVC TV Shopping Network will hold a national product search, August 8 and 9 at Company’s World Headquarters in Pennsylvania.

Hawaii entrepreneurs will have the opportunity to present their consumer products to QVC for inclusion in the network’s home shopping television channel at the e-commerce leader’s National Product Search on Friday, Aug. 8 and Saturday, Aug. 9 at QVC Studio Park, located in West Chester, PA.

The product search will provide inventors, designers and manufacturers of Hawaii products with a forum to share their innovative consumer products with QVC representatives from the merchandising, product development and vendor relations divisions.

Dennis Ling, administrator of DBEDT’s Strategic Marketing and Support Division, said this is a good opportunity for Hawaii. “QVC introduces hundreds of products to its viewers each week. Hawaii’s unique and high quality products should have special appeal this diverse consumer market.”

Each potential vendor will be scheduled a time to meet with QVC representatives to “audition” his or her product. In addition, QVC will be hosting free seminars and workshops for attendees.

For more information, visit https://www.QVCproductsearch.com or call toll free 1-888-639-4836.

”’Send any tittle or tattle you might have to Malia Zimmerman at”’ mailto:Malia@HawaiiReporter.com ”’Send complaints elsewhere. Compliments and news tips accepted here.”’