Farmers, Environmental Groups Defend Moratorium of GMO Crops on Hawaii’s Big Island

6
5240
article top

VEGETABLESReport from the Center for Food Safety – HONOLULU – A coalition of local farmers and environmental groups today filed a motion to intervene in a lawsuit to defend a Hawai‘i County ordinance that imposes a moratorium on the expansion of genetically engineered (GE) crops on the Big Island.

Sustainable agriculture nonprofit, Center for Food Safety (CFS), and three Hawai‘i Island farmers asked the court permission to join as defendants in a biotech industry lawsuit challenging the County of Hawai‘i’s Ordinance 13-121. The ordinance regulates GE organisms to prevent their environmental and economic harms, such as contamination of organic and conventional crops and wild plants and associated pesticide use. The coalition is jointly represented by counsel from CFS and Earthjustice.

inline

“Hawaii County, like every county, has the right to protect its farmers and native environments from genetically engineered crops,” said George Kimbrell, CFS senior attorney. “Having GE-free zones is critical for the sustainable future of U.S. agriculture, and to protect Hawai‘i’s unique ecosystems.”

The lawsuit, driven largely by the Biotechnology Industry Organization, the world’s largest trade association for the biotech industry representing companies like Monsanto, seeks to dissolve the county’s 2013 ordinance to open the island up for the expansion of genetically engineered crop production. These herbicide resistant crops result in intensive pesticide use, which threatens public health, contaminates water, and harms wildlife and neighboring crops. Most GE crops also threaten transgenic contamination of non-GE crops, which has already caused several billion dollars in damage to growers.

“Hawai‘i is one of the most biologically diverse, as well as spectacularly beautiful, places in the world, but the chemical companies have been turning the islands into experimental laboratories, unleashing a fountain of pesticides and genetically engineered material into the air, land and waters,” said Paul Achitoff, Earthjustice managing attorney based in Honolulu. “We stand with the people of Hawai‘i Island who are trying to protect their island from being transformed into another toxic waste dump.”

Hawai‘i County passed Ordinance 13-121 in December 2013. It restricts any future growing of GE crops in the county in order to protect farmers from transgenic contamination and instead “preserve Hawai‘i Island’s unique and vulnerable ecosystem while promoting the cultural heritage of indigenous agricultural practices.”  However, the regulations do not apply to GE papayas, which existed on the Big Island before the ordinance was passed.

“In Hawaii we believe that our seeds, crops, and foods should remain free of contamination from genetically engineered plants,” said Big Island farmer and agricultural educator, Nancy Redfeather.

“Ordinance 13-121 protects me and farmers like me.  In Ordinance 13-121, the island/Hawai’i County Council properly acted to protect the life and the health of the lands and our communities, now and for future generations, and we cannot let these corporations take away those vital protections.”

CFS and Earthjustice are also helping to defend the Kaua‘i County ordinance regulating pesticides and GE crops from a challenge filed by biotech industry, represented by the same attorneys challenging the Big Island’s ordinance.

BACKGROUND ON HAWAI‘I’S GE CROPS:

GE crops are widely grown on most of the Hawaiian Islands—Kaua‘i, O‘ahu, Maui, and Moloka‘i.  Hawai‘i’s climate, which allows for growing three or more crops per year, makes it attractive to growers, and consequently Hawai‘i has become a world center of experimental GE seed production. Some of the acreage is devoted to experimental crops that companies such as Monsanto and Syngenta grow to determine whether their genetic modifications produce a marketable product before seeking government approval to commercialize them. Other fields are then used to produce the commercial seed in quantity for export to other states.

Most GE crops are created to be resistant to the effects of herbicides, such as Monsanto’s Roundup, allowing growers to douse their fields without harming their crop.  It has been shown that these herbicide resistant crops result in increased use of herbicides, with consequent health impacts, water contamination, harm to wildlife, and harm to neighboring crops from drift.  Most GE crops also threaten transgenic contamination of non-GE crops, which has already caused several billion dollars in damage to other growers.

Center for Food Safety is a national, nonprofit, membership organization founded in 1997 to protect human health and the environment by curbing the use of harmful food production technologies and by promoting organic and other forms of sustainable agriculture.  CFS maintains offices in Washington, D.C.; San Francisco, California; Portland, Oregon; Honolulu, Hawai‘i; and has half a million members across the country. More than 5,000 reside in Hawai‘i. More information can be found at www.centerforfoodsafety.org.

Earthjustice, the nation’s premier nonprofit environmental law organization, wields the power of law and the strength of partnership to protect people’s health, to preserve magnificent places and wildlife, to advance clean energy, and to combat climate change. Because the earth needs a good lawyer.

Comments

comments

bottom

6 COMMENTS

  1. The Center for Food Safety is ANTI-Farmers and they are suing small farmers. They have also targeted politicians who support all types of farmers and agriculture with their Super PAC a political action campaign with the same deception they have used against farmers freedom to farm!

    • The Center for Food Safety is NOT anti-farmer. The suit against Hawaii County seeks to overthrow any limits on the planting of genetically engineered crops as passed by the Hawaii County Council last Spring. As a small farmer myself, I am not threatened by this conservative ruling. CFS also published the report "Monsanto vs. US Farmers. http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/…/cfsmonsantovsfar.
      Please explain yourself.

  2. GMO's are not a product of free, open markets. And this trade organization association, Biotechnology Industry Organisation, which represents companies like Monsanto uses it's political powers to advance it's own agenda by influencing regulatory agencies like the FDA. there is a revolving door between companies like Monsanto, Dupont,etc. and the FDA and USDA of former senior executives and scientists that go on to key positions as Federal regulators. what it is appears to be a government-corporate state. a crony-capitalism , just like with Big Pharma, and the main stream medical establishment.

  3. “The World Health Organization, the American Medical Association, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, the British Royal Society, and every other respected organization that has examined the evidence has come to the same conclusion: consuming foods containing ingredients derived from GM crops is no riskier than consuming the same foods containing ingredients from crop plants modified by conventional plant improvement techniques.” (AAAS 2012)

  4. consumers should have the choice of buying GMO foods or Non GMO food products.There are ways to doing this without going to court,involving expensive lawyers, having politicians and government involved.Here is at least five ways to avoid GMO food products just on your own,if that is your choice: #1 Look for the organic label always.Organic foods are never GMO. Assume that all non-organic corn,soy,cottenseed and canola ingredients are GMO. #2Stay away from artificial sweetners.Aspartame is made using GM bacterial strains of E coli. #3Beware of "invisible GMO ingredients": whey, xantham gum, glutamate, hydrolyzed vegetable protein,lactic acid,cellulose,citric acid,maltodextrin, #4 choose organic dairy products #5 don't trust produce stickers and PLU labels on fruits unless it starts with a 9. that's it. don't need to donate to a special interest with narrow political agendas pro or con.if we involve government to ban GMO foods,they will eventually ban things you enjoy or want.

Comments are closed.