Friday, May 3, 2024
More
    Home Blog Page 1988

    Rep. Dennis Arakaki Proposes Universal Health-Care Coverage Through a State Government-Run, Yet to be Created Program -Hero or Scoundrel – You Vote

    0

    Taking a page from Former First Lady Hillary Clinton’s play book, State Rep. Dennis Arakaki, D-Kalihi, introduced legislation that he says will provide “universal healthcare,” better health-care coverage and reduced costs for Hawaii’s employers and employees.

    He did not say specifically how the health-care coverage will be paid for, i.e. large monthly tax increases as proposed in the long-term care legislation now being debated at the Legislature, but he says the program should be run by the state and provide healthcare for all at taxpayers’ expense.

    Universal health-care advocates like Arakaki used the same argument to push the 1974 Hawaii Pre-paid Healthcare Act, which mandates businesses pay for health coverage for their employees who work more than 19 hours a week. The mandate was supposed to be a 50-50 partnership between business owners and employees, but instead became a one-way burden for employers who now pay all or the majority of premiums for their employees and the families of their employees because of the way the law is written.

    The projected universal coverage has continued to decline with only an estimated 85 percent of Hawaii’s population covered by health insurance down from a high in the low cost premium days of the 1980s of 96 percent. That is because today there are fewer health-care providers in Hawaii, only three — HMSA, HMAA and Kaiser — down from nearly a dozen a decade earlier and premiums are higher surging at double-digit rates annually.

    Business owners, who already operate in one of the worst business climates in the nation, say this is the single worst and most expensive mandate on business. They say the increasing health-care costs are driving them out of business and preventing them from covering themselves and their families in favor of their employees.

    Now Arakaki and several of his liberal colleagues want to give this state government that has caused through regulation and mandates this health-care crisis in Hawaii, even greater powers with what amounts to a mandatory, single-payer tax that continues the government’s one-size fits all, no choice delivery of healthcare.

    Is he a hero or a scoundrel for this proposal? You vote.

    State of the Union Address – Jan. 28, 2003

    0

    Mr. Speaker, Vice President Cheney, members of Congress, distinguished citizens and fellow citizens: Every year, by law and by custom, we meet here to consider the state of the union. This year, we gather in this chamber deeply aware of decisive days that lie ahead.

    You and I serve our country in a time of great consequence. During this session of Congress, we have the duty to reform domestic programs vital to our country; we have the opportunity to save millions of lives abroad from a terrible disease. We will work for a prosperity that is broadly shared, and we will answer every danger and every enemy that threatens the American people.

    In all these days of promise and days of reckoning, we can be confident. In a whirlwind of change and hope and peril, our faith is sure, our resolve is firm, and our union is strong.

    This country has many challenges. We will not deny, we will not ignore, we will not pass along our problems to other Congresses, to other presidents, and other generations. We will confront them with focus and clarity and courage.

    During the last two years, we have seen what can be accomplished when we work together. To lift the standards of our public schools, we achieved historic education reform — which must now be carried out in every school and in every classroom, so that every child in America can read and learn and succeed in life. To protect our country, we reorganized our government and created the Department of Homeland Security, which is mobilizing against the threats of a new era. To bring our economy out of recession, we delivered the largest tax relief in a generation. To insist on integrity in American business we passed tough reforms, and we are holding corporate criminals to account.

    Some might call this a good record; I call it a good start. Tonight I ask the House and Senate to join me in the next bold steps to serve our fellow citizens.

    Our first goal is clear: We must have an economy that grows fast enough to employ every man and woman who seeks a job. After recession, terrorist attacks, corporate scandals and stock market declines, our economy is recovering — yet it’s not growing fast enough, or strongly enough. With unemployment rising, our nation needs more small businesses to open, more companies to invest and expand, more employers to put up the sign that says, “Help Wanted.”

    Jobs are created when the economy grows; the economy grows when Americans have more money to spend and invest; and the best and fairest way to make sure Americans have that money is not to tax it away in the first place.

    I am proposing that all the income tax reductions set for 2004 and 2006 be made permanent and effective this year. And under my plan, as soon as I sign the bill, this extra money will start showing up in workers’ paychecks. Instead of gradually reducing the marriage penalty, we should do it now. Instead of slowly raising the child credit to $1,000, we should send the checks to American families now.

    The tax relief is for everyone who pays income taxes — and it will help our economy immediately: 92 million Americans will keep, this year, an average of almost $1,000 more of their own money. A family of four with an income of $40,000 would see their federal income taxes fall from $1,178 to $45 per year. Our plan will improve the bottom line for more than 23 million small businesses.

    You, the Congress, have already passed all these reductions, and promised them for future years. If this tax relief is good for Americans three, or five, or seven years from now, it is even better for Americans today.

    We should also strengthen the economy by treating investors equally in our tax laws. It’s fair to tax a company’s profits. It is not fair to again tax the shareholder on the same profits. To boost investor confidence, and to help the nearly 10 million senior who receive dividend income, I ask you to end the unfair double taxation of dividends.

    Lower taxes and greater investment will help this economy expand. More jobs mean more taxpayers, and higher revenues to our government. The best way to address the deficit and move toward a balanced budget is to encourage economic growth, and to show some spending discipline in Washington, D.C.

    We must work together to fund only our most important priorities. I will send you a budget that increases discretionary spending by 4 percent next year — about as much as the average family’s income is expected to grow. And that is a good benchmark for us. Federal spending should not rise any faster than the paychecks of American families.

    A growing economy and a focus on essential priorities will also be crucial to the future of Social Security. As we continue to work together to keep Social Security sound and reliable, we must offer younger workers a chance to invest in retirement accounts that they will control and they will own.

    Our second goal is high quality, affordable health care for all Americans. The American system of medicine is a model of skill and innovation, with a pace of discovery that is adding good years to our lives. Yet for many people, medical care costs too much — and many have no coverage at all. These problems will not be solved with a nationalized health care system that dictates coverage and rations care.

    Instead, we must work toward a system in which all Americans have a good insurance policy, choose their own doctors, and seniors and low-income Americans receive the help they need. Instead of bureaucrats and trial lawyers and HMOs, we must put doctors and nurses and patients back in charge of American medicine.

    Health care reform must begin with Medicare; Medicare is the binding commitment of a caring society. We must renew that commitment by giving seniors access to preventive medicine and new drugs that are transforming health care in America.

    Seniors happy with the current Medicare system should be able to keep their coverage just the way it is. And just like you — the members of Congress, and your staffs, and other federal employees — all seniors should have the choice of a health care plan that provides prescription drugs.

    My budget will commit an additional $400 billion over the next decade to reform and strengthen Medicare. Leaders of both political parties have talked for years about strengthening Medicare. I urge the members of this new Congress to act this year.

    To improve our health care system, we must address one of the prime causes of higher cost, the constant threat that physicians and hospitals will be unfairly sued. Because of excessive litigation, everybody pays more for health care, and many parts of America are losing fine doctors. No one has ever been healed by a frivolous lawsuit. I urge the Congress to pass medical liability reform.

    Our third goal is to promote energy independence for our country, while dramatically improving the environment. I have sent you a comprehensive energy plan to promote energy efficiency and conservation, to develop cleaner technology, and to produce more energy at home. I have sent you Clear Skies legislation that mandates a 70-percent cut in air pollution from power plants over the next 15 years. I have sent you a Healthy Forests Initiative, to help prevent the catastrophic fires that devastate communities, kill wildlife, and burn away millions of acres of treasured forest.

    I urge you to pass these measures, for the good of both our environment and our economy. Even more, I ask you to take a crucial step and protect our environment in ways that generations before us could not have imagined.

    In this century, the greatest environmental progress will come about not through endless lawsuits or command-and-control regulations, but through technology and innovation. Tonight I’m proposing $1.2 billion in research funding so that America can lead the world in developing clean, hydrogen-powered automobiles.

    A single chemical reaction between hydrogen and oxygen generates energy, which can be used to power a car — producing only water, not exhaust fumes. With a new national commitment, our scientists and engineers will overcome obstacles to taking these cars from laboratory to showroom, so that the first car driven by a child born today could be powered by hydrogen, and pollution-free.

    Join me in this important innovation to make our air significantly cleaner, and our country much less dependent on foreign sources of energy.

    Our fourth goal is to apply the compassion of America to the deepest problems of America. For so many in our country — the homeless and the fatherless, the addicted — the need is great. Yet there’s power, wonder-working power, in the goodness and idealism and faith of the American people.

    Americans are doing the work of compassion every day — visiting prisoners, providing shelter for battered women, bringing companionship to lonely seniors. These good works deserve our praise; they deserve our personal support; and when appropriate, they deserve the assistance of the federal government.

    I urge you to pass both my faith-based initiative and the Citizen Service Act, to encourage acts of compassion that can transform America, one heart and one soul at a time.

    Last year, I called on my fellow citizens to participate in the USA Freedom Corps, which is enlisting tens of thousands of new volunteers across America. Tonight I ask Congress and the American people to focus the spirit of service and the resources of government on the needs of some of our most vulnerable citizens — boys and girls trying to grow up without guidance and attention, and children who have to go through a prison gate to be hugged by their mom or dad.

    I propose a $450-million initiative to bring mentors to more than a million disadvantaged junior high students and children of prisoners. Government will support the training and recruiting of mentors; yet it is the men and women of America who will fill the need. One mentor, one person can change a life forever. And I urge you to be that one person.

    Another cause of hopelessness is addiction to drugs. Addiction crowds out friendship, ambition, moral conviction, and reduces all the richness of life to a single destructive desire. As a government, we are fighting illegal drugs by cutting off supplies and reducing demand through anti-drug education programs. Yet for those already addicted, the fight against drugs is a fight for their own lives. Too many Americans in search of treatment cannot get it. So tonight I propose a new $600-million program to help an additional 300,000 Americans receive treatment over the next three years.

    Our nation is blessed with recovery programs that do amazing work. One of them is found at the Healing Place Church in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. A man in the program said, “God does miracles in people’s lives, and you never think it could be you.” Tonight, let us bring to all Americans who struggle with drug addiction this message of hope: The miracle of recovery is possible, and it could be you.

    By caring for children who need mentors, and for addicted men and women who need treatment, we are building a more welcoming society — a culture that values every life. And in this work we must not overlook the weakest among us. I ask you to protect infants at the very hour of their birth and end the practice of partial-birth abortion. And because no human life should be started or ended as the object of an experiment, I ask you to set a high standard for humanity, and pass a law against all human cloning.

    The qualities of courage and compassion that we strive for in America also determine our conduct abroad. The American flag stands for more than our power and our interests. Our founders dedicated this country to the cause of human dignity, the rights of every person, and the possibilities of every life. This conviction leads us into the world to help the afflicted, and defend the peace, and confound the designs of evil men.

    In Afghanistan, we helped liberate an oppressed people. And we will continue helping them secure their country, rebuild their society, and educate all their children — boys and girls. In the Middle East, we will continue to seek peace between a secure Israel and a democratic Palestine. Across the Earth, America is feeding the hungry — more than 60 percent of international food aid comes as a gift from the people of the United States. As our nation moves troops and builds alliances to make our world safer, we must also remember our calling as a blessed country is to make this world better.

    Today, on the continent of Africa, nearly 30 million people have the AIDS virus — including 3 million children under the age 15. There are whole countries in Africa where more than one-third of the adult population carries the infection. More than 4 million require immediate drug treatment. Yet across that continent, only 50,000 AIDS victims — only 50,000 — are receiving the medicine they need.

    Because the AIDS diagnosis is considered a death sentence, many do not seek treatment. Almost all who do are turned away. A doctor in rural South Africa describes his frustration. He says, “We have no medicines. Many hospitals tell people, you’ve got AIDS, we can’t help you. Go home and die.” In an age of miraculous medicines, no person should have to hear those words.

    AIDS can be prevented. Anti-retroviral drugs can extend life for many years. And the cost of those drugs has dropped from $12,000 a year to under $300 a year — which places a tremendous possibility within our grasp. Ladies and gentlemen, seldom has history offered a greater opportunity to do so much for so many.

    We have confronted, and will continue to confront, HIV/AIDS in our own country. And to meet a severe and urgent crisis abroad, tonight I propose the Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief — a work of mercy beyond all current international efforts to help the people of Africa. This comprehensive plan will prevent 7 million new AIDS infections, treat at least 2 million people with life-extending drugs, and provide humane care for millions of people suffering from AIDS, and for children orphaned by AIDS.

    I ask the Congress to commit $15 billion over the next five years, including nearly $10 billion in new money, to turn the tide against AIDS in the most afflicted nations of Africa and the Caribbean.

    This nation can lead the world in sparing innocent people from a plague of nature. And this nation is leading the world in confronting and defeating the man-made evil of international terrorism.

    There are days when our fellow citizens do not hear news about the war on terror. There’s never a day when I do not learn of another threat, or receive reports of operations in progress, or give an order in this global war against a scattered network of killers. The war goes on, and we are winning.

    To date, we’ve arrested or otherwise dealt with many key commanders of al Qaeda. They include a man who directed logistics and funding for the September the 11th attacks; the chief of al Qaeda operations in the Persian Gulf, who planned the bombings of our embassies in East Africa and the USS Cole; an al Qaeda operations chief from Southeast Asia; a former director of al Qaeda’s training camps in Afghanistan; a key al Qaeda operative in Europe; a major al Qaeda leader in Yemen. All told, more than 3,000 suspected terrorists have been arrested in many countries. Many others have met a different fate. Let’s put it this way — they are no longer a problem to the United States and our friends and allies.

    We are working closely with other nations to prevent further attacks. America and coalition countries have uncovered and stopped terrorist conspiracies targeting the American embassy in Yemen, the American embassy in Singapore, a Saudi military base, ships in the Straits of Hormuz and the Straits the Gibraltar. We’ve broken al Qaeda cells in Hamburg, Milan, Madrid, London, Paris, as well as, Buffalo, New York.

    We have the terrorists on the run. We’re keeping them on the run. One by one, the terrorists are learning the meaning of American justice.

    As we fight this war, we will remember where it began — here, in our own country. This government is taking unprecedented measures to protect our people and defend our homeland. We’ve intensified security at the borders and ports of entry, posted more than 50,000 newly-trained federal screeners in airports, begun inoculating troops and first responders against smallpox, and are deploying the nation’s first early warning network of sensors to detect biological attack. And this year, for the first time, we are beginning to field a defense to protect this nation against ballistic missiles.

    I thank the Congress for supporting these measures. I ask you tonight to add to our future security with a major research and production effort to guard our people against bioterrorism, called Project Bioshield. The budget I send you will propose almost $6 billion to quickly make available effective vaccines and treatments against agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, Ebola, and plague. We must assume that our enemies would use these diseases as weapons, and we must act before the dangers are upon us.

    Since September the 11th, our intelligence and law enforcement agencies have worked more closely than ever to track and disrupt the terrorists. The FBI is improving its ability to analyze intelligence, and is transforming itself to meet new threats. Tonight, I am instructing the leaders of the FBI, the CIA, the Homeland Security, and the Department of Defense to develop a Terrorist Threat Integration Center, to merge and analyze all threat information in a single location. Our government must have the very best information possible, and we will use it to make sure the right people are in the right places to protect all our citizens.

    Our war against terror is a contest of will in which perseverance is power. In the ruins of two towers, at the western wall of the Pentagon, on a field in Pennsylvania, this nation made a pledge, and we renew that pledge tonight: Whatever the duration of this struggle, and whatever the difficulties, we will not permit the triumph of violence in the affairs of men — free people will set the course of history.

    Today, the gravest danger in the war on terror, the gravest danger facing America and the world, is outlaw regimes that seek and possess nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons. These regimes could use such weapons for blackmail, terror, and mass murder. They could also give or sell those weapons to terrorist allies, who would use them without the least hesitation.

    This threat is new; America’s duty is familiar. Throughout the 20th century, small groups of men seized control of great nations, built armies and arsenals, and set out to dominate the weak and intimidate the world. In each case, their ambitions of cruelty and murder had no limit. In each case, the ambitions of Hitlerism, militarism, and communism were defeated by the will of free peoples, by the strength of great alliances, and by the might of the United States of America.

    Now, in this century, the ideology of power and domination has appeared again, and seeks to gain the ultimate weapons of terror. Once again, this nation and all our friends are all that stand between a world at peace, and a world of chaos and constant alarm. Once again, we are called to defend the safety of our people, and the hopes of all mankind. And we accept this responsibility.

    America is making a broad and determined effort to confront these dangers. We have called on the United Nations to fulfill its charter and stand by its demand that Iraq disarm. We’re strongly supporting the International Atomic Energy Agency in its mission to track and control nuclear materials around the world. We’re working with other governments to secure nuclear materials in the former Soviet Union, and to strengthen global treaties banning the production and shipment of missile technologies and weapons of mass destruction.

    In all these efforts, however, America’s purpose is more than to follow a process — it is to achieve a result: the end of terrible threats to the civilized world. All free nations have a stake in preventing sudden and catastrophic attacks. And we’re asking them to join us, and many are doing so. Yet the course of this nation does not depend on the decisions of others. (Applause.) Whatever action is required, whenever action is necessary, I will defend the freedom and security of the American people.

    Different threats require different strategies. In Iran, we continue to see a government that represses its people, pursues weapons of mass destruction, and supports terror. We also see Iranian citizens risking intimidation and death as they speak out for liberty and human rights and democracy. Iranians, like all people, have a right to choose their own government and determine their own destiny — and the United States supports their aspirations to live in freedom.

    On the Korean Peninsula, an oppressive regime rules a people living in fear and starvation. Throughout the 1990s, the United States relied on a negotiated framework to keep North Korea from gaining nuclear weapons. We now know that that regime was deceiving the world, and developing those weapons all along. And today the North Korean regime is using its nuclear program to incite fear and seek concessions. America and the world will not be blackmailed.

    America is working with the countries of the region — South Korea, Japan, China, and Russia — to find a peaceful solution, and to show the North Korean government that nuclear weapons will bring only isolation, economic stagnation, and continued hardship. (Applause.) The North Korean regime will find respect in the world and revival for its people only when it turns away from its nuclear ambitions.

    Our nation and the world must learn the lessons of the Korean Peninsula and not allow an even greater threat to rise up in Iraq. A brutal dictator, with a history of reckless aggression, with ties to terrorism, with great potential wealth, will not be permitted to dominate a vital region and threaten the United States.

    Twelve years ago, Saddam Hussein faced the prospect of being the last casualty in a war he had started and lost. To spare himself, he agreed to disarm of all weapons of mass destruction. For the next 12 years, he systematically violated that agreement. He pursued chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, even while inspectors were in his country. Nothing to date has restrained him from his pursuit of these weapons — not economic sanctions, not isolation from the civilized world, not even cruise missile strikes on his military facilities.

    Almost three months ago, the United Nations Security Council gave Saddam Hussein his final chance to disarm. He has shown instead utter contempt for the United Nations, and for the opinion of the world. The 108 U.N. inspectors were sent to conduct — were not sent to conduct a scavenger hunt for hidden materials across a country the size of California. The job of the inspectors is to verify that Iraq’s regime is disarming. It is up to Iraq to show exactly where it is hiding its banned weapons, lay those weapons out for the world to see, and destroy them as directed. Nothing like this has happened.

    The United Nations concluded in 1999 that Saddam Hussein had biological weapons sufficient to produce over 25,000 liters of anthrax — enough doses to kill several million people. He hasn’t accounted for that material. He’s given no evidence that he has destroyed it.

    The United Nations concluded that Saddam Hussein had materials sufficient to produce more than 38,000 liters of botulinum toxin — enough to subject millions of people to death by respiratory failure. He hadn’t accounted for that material. He’s given no evidence that he has destroyed it.

    Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent. In such quantities, these chemical agents could also kill untold thousands. He’s not accounted for these materials. He has given no evidence that he has destroyed them.

    U.S. intelligence indicates that Saddam Hussein had upwards of 30,000 munitions capable of delivering chemical agents. Inspectors recently turned up 16 of them — despite Iraq’s recent declaration denying their existence. Saddam Hussein has not accounted for the remaining 29,984 of these prohibited munitions. He’s given no evidence that he has destroyed them.

    From three Iraqi defectors we know that Iraq, in the late 1990s, had several mobile biological weapons labs. These are designed to produce germ warfare agents, and can be moved from place to a place to evade inspectors. Saddam Hussein has not disclosed these facilities. He’s given no evidence that he has destroyed them.

    The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed in the 1990s that Saddam Hussein had an advanced nuclear weapons development program, had a design for a nuclear weapon and was working on five different methods of enriching uranium for a bomb. The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. Our intelligence sources tell us that he has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production. Saddam Hussein has not credibly explained these activities. He clearly has much to hide.

    The dictator of Iraq is not disarming. To the contrary; he is deceiving. From intelligence sources we know, for instance, that thousands of Iraqi security personnel are at work hiding documents and materials from the U.N. inspectors, sanitizing inspection sites and monitoring the inspectors themselves. Iraqi officials accompany the inspectors in order to intimidate witnesses.

    Iraq is blocking U-2 surveillance flights requested by the United Nations. Iraqi intelligence officers are posing as the scientists inspectors are supposed to interview. Real scientists have been coached by Iraqi officials on what to say. Intelligence sources indicate that Saddam Hussein has ordered that scientists who cooperate with U.N. inspectors in disarming Iraq will be killed, along with their families.

    Year after year, Saddam Hussein has gone to elaborate lengths, spent enormous sums, taken great risks to build and keep weapons of mass destruction. But why? The only possible explanation, the only possible use he could have for those weapons, is to dominate, intimidate, or attack.

    With nuclear arms or a full arsenal of chemical and biological weapons, Saddam Hussein could resume his ambitions of conquest in the Middle East and create deadly havoc in that region. And this Congress and the America people must recognize another threat. Evidence from intelligence sources, secret communications, and statements by people now in custody reveal that Saddam Hussein aids and protects terrorists, including members of al Qaeda. Secretly, and without fingerprints, he could provide one of his hidden weapons to terrorists, or help them develop their own.

    Before September the 11th, many in the world believed that Saddam Hussein could be contained. But chemical agents, lethal viruses and shadowy terrorist networks are not easily contained. Imagine those 19 hijackers with other weapons and other plans — this time armed by Saddam Hussein. It would take one vial, one canister, one crate slipped into this country to bring a day of horror like none we have ever known. We will do everything in our power to make sure that that day never comes.

    Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike? If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words, and all recriminations would come too late. Trusting in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein is not a strategy, and it is not an option.

    The dictator who is assembling the world’s most dangerous weapons has already used them on whole villages — leaving thousands of his own citizens dead, blind, or disfigured. Iraqi refugees tell us how forced confessions are obtained — by torturing children while their parents are made to watch. International human rights groups have catalogued other methods used in the torture chambers of Iraq: electric shock, burning with hot irons, dripping acid on the skin, mutilation with electric drills, cutting out tongues, and rape. If this is not evil, then evil has no meaning.

    And tonight I have a message for the brave and oppressed people of Iraq: Your enemy is not surrounding your country — your enemy is ruling your country. (Applause.) And the day he and his regime are removed from power will be the day of your liberation.

    The world has waited 12 years for Iraq to disarm. America will not accept a serious and mounting threat to our country, and our friends and our allies. The United States will ask the U.N. Security Council to convene on February the 5th to consider the facts of Iraq’s ongoing defiance of the world. Secretary of State Powell will present information and intelligence about Iraqi’s legal — Iraq’s illegal weapons programs, its attempt to hide those weapons from inspectors, and its links to terrorist groups.

    We will consult. But let there be no misunderstanding: If Saddam Hussein does not fully disarm, for the safety of our people and for the peace of the world, we will lead a coalition to disarm him.

    Tonight I have a message for the men and women who will keep the peace, members of the American Armed Forces: Many of you are assembling in or near the Middle East, and some crucial hours may lay ahead. In those hours, the success of our cause will depend on you. Your training has prepared you. Your honor will guide you. You believe in America, and America believes in you.

    Sending Americans into battle is the most profound decision a President can make. The technologies of war have changed; the risks and suffering of war have not. For the brave Americans who bear the risk, no victory is free from sorrow. This nation fights reluctantly, because we know the cost and we dread the days of mourning that always come.

    We seek peace. We strive for peace. And sometimes peace must be defended. A future lived at the mercy of terrible threats is no peace at all. If war is forced upon us, we will fight in a just cause and by just means — sparing, in every way we can, the innocent. And if war is forced upon us, we will fight with the full force and might of the United States military — and we will prevail.

    And as we and our coalition partners are doing in Afghanistan, we will bring to the Iraqi people food and medicines and supplies — and freedom.

    Many challenges, abroad and at home, have arrived in a single season. In two years, America has gone from a sense of invulnerability to an awareness of peril; from bitter division in small matters to calm unity in great causes. And we go forward with confidence, because this call of history has come to the right country.

    Americans are a resolute people who have risen to every test of our time. Adversity has revealed the character of our country, to the world and to ourselves. America is a strong nation, and honorable in the use of our strength. We exercise power without conquest, and we sacrifice for the liberty of strangers.

    Americans are a free people, who know that freedom is the right of every person and the future of every nation. The liberty we prize is not America’s gift to the world, it is God’s gift to humanity.

    We Americans have faith in ourselves, but not in ourselves alone. We do not know — we do not claim to know all the ways of Providence, yet we can trust in them, placing our confidence in the loving God behind all of life, and all of h

    New Century Charter School Allocations Project – FY2002-03-Report No. 03-01 – A Report to the Governor and the

    0

    ”Overview”

    Section 302A-1185, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS), requires the Office of the Auditor to allocate the Department of Education

    New Century Charter School Allocations Project – FY2002-03-Report No. 03-01 – A Report to the Governor and the

    0

    ‘Overview’ Section 302A-1185, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS), requires the Office of the Auditor to allocate the Department of Education?s general funds to new century charter schools and new century conversion charter schools. Charter schools are semiautonomous public schools operated by parents, educators, community groups, or private organizations under contracts with the Board of Education. This year?s allocation — our fifth — was guided by two legislative actions amending Section 302A-1185, HRS. Acts 2 and 262, Session Laws of Hawaii 2002, created a category of public schools that converted into charter schools. Two of the 25 charter schools fall into this new category. The statutory requirements for allocating funds were amended. The allocation is based on departmental funding for budget programs EDN100, 200, 300, and 400, and official regular education enrollment for the current fiscal year. EDN150 funds for special education are excluded, as are changes to the department?s budget made by the Legislature or governor, departmental restrictions and collectively bargained sums. Additionally, the Auditor must exclude funds for necessary state-level services; programs or projects for specific schools, complexes, or districts; grants in aid; and resources for new facilities. We used a per pupil allocation methodology for FY2002-03, resulting in an allocation rate of $3,805 per regular education student officially enrolled in a charter school. The amounts allocated to the charter schools range from $76,100 to $1,795,960. The total allocated to all charter schools is $11,723,205. Finally, we note three additional concerns: 1) a retroactive provision in Act 262 may require an additional appropriation; 2) the statute relating to new century conversion charter schools needs clarification; and 3) the continued role of the Auditor in the allocation process is problematic. Act 262 changes the allocation computation retroactively, beginning with FY2001-02. However, Act 262 was signed into law on July 5, 2002, after the completion of FY2001-02, and does not appropriate additional funds to cover the recalculation for the previous fiscal year. In the absence of a clear legislative directive and adequate appropriations, we did not address the retroactive allotments issue. Act 2 establishes a new class of charter schools called new century conversion charter schools. The statute now provides for two distinct methods of allocating charter school funds, one for new century charter schools and the other for newly converted new century conversion charter schools. However, it is unclear whether the allocation method for newly converted schools applies to schools to be converted in the future only, or also to the already converted charter schools. It is also unclear whether the Auditor?s responsibilities continue after the first year of operation, when a school is no longer a newly converted school. Additionally, the statutes are ambiguous regarding newly converted charter schools. The Department of Education is required to provide appropriate transitional resources to a conversion charter school for its first year of operation based on the school?s prior year allocation. However, the Auditor is obligated to develop a methodology for newly converted charter schools based on departmental program budgets. We recommend that the Legislature clarify its intent. Regarding the role of the Auditor, we continue to note, as we have in previous reports, that our role in the allocation process should be reviewed. We acknowledge the legislative preference that we determine the allocation but note that this is an executive branch function more properly placed in that branch. ‘Recommendations and Response’ The Department of Education responded that it agrees with our concern that the allocation process places the Office of the Auditor in a potential conflict with its constitutional and statutorily assigned audit functions. Also, the department indicated that, should the Auditor continue to be assigned the allocation function for charter schools, legislation is needed to clarify that the Auditor should use the same methodology for existing and newly established conversion charter schools. The department also agrees that the Auditor was unable to provide retroactive funding because Act 262 was not signed until July 5, 2002, and was absent any appropriation. The department also noted some issues of concern. The department requested that the Auditor notify the department of the per pupil allocation by Sept. 1 of each year in order to facilitate the department?s final distribution to the charter schools by Oct. 15. We note, however, that this request is unreasonable since the department is not required to give us its official enrollment counts until Sept. 15, and the allocation calculations cannot begin without those counts. The department also indicated that the July 5, 2002 signing of Act 262 did not allow new century charter schools to enter into an annual memorandum of agreement with the department for centralized services prior to the beginning of the school year as required by the revised law. Finally, the department requests that the Auditor allocate a per pupil amount for all students, including special education students. We remind the department that the current law does not provide for Auditor?s allocations for special education students. ”To see this and other reports of the Auditor, go to:” https://www.state.hi.us/auditor/Years/2003reports.htm

    Entertaining To Win Clients

    0

    The Super Bowl can teach us a lot about business. Are you one of the

    millions who admit they actually took their break while the game was on, and sat through the commercials? Or tuned in to the Super Bowl just to see the commercials?

    We’ve come a long way in the advertising industry. I can remember “the olden days” when we lived without remote controls. When you would rather physically get off your couch to “turn the dial” than to suffer through arduous in-your-face sales commercials.

    If your business is still thinking about marketing and advertising in the traditional way, you may be losing more clients than you realize. To make sure your not, let’s examine some traditional marketing lessons to see where you may need to add a twist to improve your results.

    You may have learned to develop a Unique Selling Proposition (USP). A message that sells your product or service in a way that customers
    understand in what ways you’re better than your competition. You may have learned that it is important to repeat your company name over and over again so people remember it, and automatically come to you when they need your product or service.

    Ultimately, no matter how cute your message is, if it doesn’t bring people clamoring to you with money in hand, it’s all money down the drain.

    While old marketing approaches and strategies are not necessarily wrong, many are out-dated. Which makes these approaches the long and hard way of doing things. As you begin to work smarter, you learn how to leverage your message in such a powerful way that you’ll be remembered in 60 seconds, and customers will call you immediately after they experience your message.

    Commercials have taken on a whole new image — and that image comes from emotion. More and more we are finding ourselves being entertained by companies. You may experience yourself laughing, learning or loving during some of these powerfully creative messages. (Think about Hallmark, the Budweiser Frogs and the anti-drug commercials in years past.) For instance during this year’s Super Bowl, there was an ad Celine Dion starred in for Chrysler that was more like a music video than a commercial. Celine’s voice, the visual images, the way the photography was shot all combined to create an emotional stimulus. When people are being entertained, they are more likely to accept your product or service, because they drop their defenses.

    ”Coaches Challenge:”

    Here are a few thoughts that will get you thinking innovatively about your message.

    *1. How can you learn from big business on how you can operate and promote your small business? If you think of your USP or commercial as your powerful message to another person, you’ll promote your business in a more profitable way.

    *2. Think about your reactions and time constraints when it comes to advertisements and commercials. Do you really have the time to read and listen to every business owner’s promotion? In this time-limited generation, people will only pay attention to the messages that captures their attention. If the message is providing you with something you need or want, you will stay alert and want more information. The rest is just a distraction.

    *3. Will your message be a distraction that annoys the viewer or reader? Or will your message be one that inspires, excites, educates or captivates your target audiences’ attention to accept, understand and want more of what you are offering? If it’s the former, you’ll find yourself whining about business, and blame the lack of funds on something like the economy. But if it’s the latter, you’ll find yourself winning.

    It’s time to decide if you and your company will be the leader within your industry, or if you will simply follow the rules of how business has always been done. When you innovate your message and focus on emotion-based results-generating advertising, you’ll be capturing people’s attention while your competition gets stuck in the past.

    To learn more secrets about how your small business can profit from the same principles the big dollar advertisers of the Super Bowl use, send me an email, and I’ll send you more examples that you can model, and use in your own business economically. Your message will be turning people on before they ever think of turning you off.

    ”’Deborah Cole Micek, the Performance Results Coach and President of RPM Success Group, can be reached by email at:”’ mailto:DCM@RPMSuccess.com ”’or toll-free at 888-334-8151.”’

    Taking Care of Yourself

    0

    “Suzanne Gelb Image”

    Dear Readers:

    As an added resource, over the next few months I will be supplementing my responses with references to self-help materials. Supplemental reading for today’s answers can be found in my book “Welcome Home. A Book About Overcoming Addictions” (pp. 5-6 relates to Answer No. 1; pp. 7-10 relates to Answer No. 2). For more information visit my Web site at https://www.DrGelbSays.com

    ”Helping Others – When do I Care for Me?”

    Dear Dr. Gelb:

    I try to be a giving person, but I am so busy taking care of others, and I don’t only mean my responsibilities to my family, but it seems like I am always trying to help others to the point that I end up drained and exhausted. It is hard for me to say “no,” even if it means neglecting myself. How do I learn when and how to say no?

    Exhausted

    A: Dr. Gelb says . . .

    Dear Exhausted:

    People who engage in the type of behavior you describe often find that their worth is dependent on being “a good girl” or a “good boy” — as the terminology implies, these behavioral goals tend to be a carry over from childhood. To such individuals, being “a good girl” or “a good boy,” as the case may be, means doting over the concerns of others and their needs. As long as such individuals are able to cater to these needs, then on some level, they feel like they are that good girl or boy, even to the point of self-neglect and exhaustion. If someone has a need, such individuals are there for the rescue.

    Please consider taking a moment for yourself. Of course, the guilt that can arise when making such a self-directed choice, can cause one to feel selfish. This is not the case at all. Taking care of Self is a necessary and sustaining behavior.

    ”Confidence — Why do I Battle Insecurity?”

    Dear Dr. Gelb:

    I am successful socially and professionally, but inside I battle feelings of insecurity and self-criticism. It’s almost like I have a pile driver in my head, constantly putting me down. It’s harder, I think, because no one knows how I really feel. I don’t really know how I’ve learned to pull it off as far as the outside world sees me, but what can I do to make peace with myself?

    At War

    A: Dr. Gelb says . . .

    Dear At War:

    Your question is one that is asked by many people. I wish there was a simple answer or a quick fix, but that is not so. As silly as it may sound to people who are outwardly successful and even thriving, there are competent mental health practitioners who can assist with those internal problems that are hidden from the surface. Many insurances pay for this type of service, usually under the medical coverage.

    Why live with a self-debilitating affliction when there is help to resolve it. Good Luck.

    ”’Suzanne J. Gelb, Ph.D., J.D. authors this daily column, Dr. Gelb Says, which answers questions about daily living and behavior issues. Dr. Gelb is a licensed psychologist in private practice in Honolulu. She holds a Ph.D. in Psychology and a Ph.D. in Human Services. Dr. Gelb is also a published author of a book on Overcoming Addictions and a book on Relationships.”’

    ”’This column is intended for entertainment use only and is not intended for the purpose of psychological diagnosis, treatment or personalized advice. For more about the column’s purpose, see”’ “An Online Intro to Dr. Gelb Says”

    ”’Email your questions to mailto:DrGelbSays@hawaiireporter.com More information on Dr. Gelb’s services and related resources available at”’ https://www.DrGelbSays.com

    Taking Care of Yourself

    0

    Suzanne Gelb Image Dear Readers: As an added resource, over the next few months I will be supplementing my responses with references to self-help materials. Supplemental reading for today’s answers can be found in my book “Welcome Home. A Book About Overcoming Addictions” (pp. 5-6 relates to Answer No. 1; pp. 7-10 relates to Answer No. 2). For more information visit my Web site at https://www.DrGelbSays.com ‘Helping Others – When do I Care for Me?’ Dear Dr. Gelb: I try to be a giving person, but I am so busy taking care of others, and I don’t only mean my responsibilities to my family, but it seems like I am always trying to help others to the point that I end up drained and exhausted. It is hard for me to say “no,” even if it means neglecting myself. How do I learn when and how to say no? Exhausted A: Dr. Gelb says . . . Dear Exhausted: People who engage in the type of behavior you describe often find that their worth is dependent on being “a good girl” or a “good boy” — as the terminology implies, these behavioral goals tend to be a carry over from childhood. To such individuals, being “a good girl” or “a good boy,” as the case may be, means doting over the concerns of others and their needs. As long as such individuals are able to cater to these needs, then on some level, they feel like they are that good girl or boy, even to the point of self-neglect and exhaustion. If someone has a need, such individuals are there for the rescue. Please consider taking a moment for yourself. Of course, the guilt that can arise when making such a self-directed choice, can cause one to feel selfish. This is not the case at all. Taking care of Self is a necessary and sustaining behavior. ‘Confidence — Why do I Battle Insecurity?’ Dear Dr. Gelb: I am successful socially and professionally, but inside I battle feelings of insecurity and self-criticism. It’s almost like I have a pile driver in my head, constantly putting me down. It’s harder, I think, because no one knows how I really feel. I don’t really know how I’ve learned to pull it off as far as the outside world sees me, but what can I do to make peace with myself? At War A: Dr. Gelb says . . . Dear At War: Your question is one that is asked by many people. I wish there was a simple answer or a quick fix, but that is not so. As silly as it may sound to people who are outwardly successful and even thriving, there are competent mental health practitioners who can assist with those internal problems that are hidden from the surface. Many insurances pay for this type of service, usually under the medical coverage. Why live with a self-debilitating affliction when there is help to resolve it. Good Luck. ”Suzanne J. Gelb, Ph.D., J.D. authors this daily column, Dr. Gelb Says, which answers questions about daily living and behavior issues. Dr. Gelb is a licensed psychologist in private practice in Honolulu. She holds a Ph.D. in Psychology and a Ph.D. in Human Services. Dr. Gelb is also a published author of a book on Overcoming Addictions and a book on Relationships.” ”This column is intended for entertainment use only and is not intended for the purpose of psychological diagnosis, treatment or personalized advice. For more about the column’s purpose, see” “An Online Intro to Dr. Gelb Says” ”Email your questions to mailto:DrGelbSays@hawaiireporter.com More information on Dr. Gelb’s services and related resources available at” https://www.DrGelbSays.com

    Drug Testing of Students Proposed by Senate President, Endorsed by Governor-Following the Federal Funding May Offer Some Explanation for This Out-of-left-field Proposal

    0

    “Laura Brown Image”

    The days of rulers rapped across students’ knuckles to enforce discipline in schools are gone.

    Now, according to federal and state officials, children have gone hog wild and are using tobacco, alcohol and drugs. Hawaii has a plan to bring them under control: Drug test every one of them.

    This is the proposal of Hawaii Senate President Robert Bunda, referred to by Gov. Linda Lingle in her Jan. 21, 2003, State of the State address as an idea that has merit. For those in the audience who thought the idea came out of left field, they need only follow the money that precedes the idea, back to the hand that feeds our state — the federal government.

    The U.S. Departments of Education, Justice and Health and Human Services recently announced more than $80 million in grants to 46 communities to prevent aggressive and violent behavior and drug and alcohol use among the nation’s youth through the Safe Schools/Healthy Students (SSHS) Program.

    This collaboration among the three federal agencies heaps education, mental health, social service, law enforcement and juvenile justice all onto the plate of local public schools.

    “We know from our work with the U.S. Secret Service and from other research that the best way to deal with youth who are troubled is through the development of a comprehensive strategy that involves schools, mental health providers and law enforcement,” U.S. Secretary of Education Rod Paige said. “It is absolutely critical to bring mental health professionals, school officials and law enforcement to the table to address the issue of safe schools. The SSHS grants do just that.”

    It is more likely that at the most these programs merely expand the profits of drug testing and research companies while violating students’ right to privacy, and stretching school and taxpayer resources to the breaking point.

    As Hawaii faces budget cuts and deficits, why spend scarce resources on drug testing?

    Hawaii is still reeling from the Felix Consent Decree spurred by federal research on methods to reduce the costs of mental health care nationally.

    In 1993, the Children’s Mental Health Services (CMHS) arm of Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) division under the federal Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) embarked on the Children and Their Families research project in 22 states, including Hawaii.

    Unsuccessful attempts by local agencies and principal investigators to replace qualified mental health care with bogus “fix the family” treatments resulted in the federal court’s intervention to force Hawaii to shift the responsibility for child mental health services to public schools.

    The Legislature had no choice but to comply. Hawaii Session Laws, Act 91 (1999) required the Departments of Education and Health to do just that. This move resulted in the state agencies’ inability to collect Medicaid payments under the School Based Behavioral Health model, the exodus of qualified mental health personnel to other states, teacher and administrator burnout, exploding education budgets and, most frightening of all, damaged children and families.

    ”Lesson Goes Unlearned by Local Legislators”

    The promise by Lingle that drug testing would be “voluntary” and “preventative” not “punitive” is not reflected in bills making drug testing mandatory for enrollment in public school.

    HB1297 would require the identification of drug users, followed by counseling and treatment. This would miraculously improve student academic performance by reducing retention, suspension and expulsion rates, while deterring high school students from a life of crime.

    More importantly though, in conformance to requirements of the federal grant, Hawaii’s schools must perform a needs assessment and create an integrated database of information on the prevalence of drug use and the level of need for services.

    Twenty-five percent of all students would be tested. In other words, schools would perform a research marketing survey for predatory mainland consultants to come sell their services to solve Hawaii’s youth drug “crisis.” Would a consent decree — a la Felix — follow?

    Another bill to watch is SB1471, requiring the testing of all public school children using urinalysis. (This is in a public school system that is known for its lack of toilet paper.) Educators and staff would be “trained” on how to spot users of illicit drugs. (Putting that training in “best practices” for reading on hold.)

    SB 716 allows for the expulsion of children selling or using “intoxicating” liquor or drugs and allows for random drug testing of all public school children. A student may be tested even if he “reasonably appears” to have used illicit substances. If a student tests positive, the principal may refer the student to a treatment program, bypassing parental consent.

    SB 1471 prefers the hair testing method to be done on all students within the first 20 school days of each school year. Students who test positive will have another drug test 90 days later. The Department of Health will be in charge of student and family drug surveys. Students who are eligible for free and reduced lunch will get a discount on their drug testing.

    ”’Next Rotten Apple: Hawaii’s Education Beat will explore the costs of drug testing.”’

    ”’Laura Brown is the education reporter for HawaiiReporter.com and can be reached via email at”’ mailto:LauraBrown@hawaii.rr.com

    School Performance and Improvement in Hawaii 2001-Report Issued In 2002 by the State Dept. of Education

    0

    The Superintendent’s Annual Report on School Performance and Improvement in Hawaii is one of two reports in the state’s system of school accountability. This report contains collective data on our schools for school year 2000-01, showing trends over time and, where appropriate, comparisons with data from other states.

    The other report, the School Status and Improvement Report, is prepared annually for each school. These reports contain school data and summaries of the schools’ standards implementation plans and improvement activities. They are available at public libraries and online at https://arch.k12.hi.us on the World Wide Web.

    These reports are the most visible parts of the Department of Education’s assessment and accountability system, the purpose of which is to hold everyone in the department, including me, responsible for student learning. These reports grew out of the department’s initiative, begun over 10 years ago, to develop a comprehensive accountability system for the public schools of Hawaii. The department’s efforts have laid a sound foundation for the system, but the system is very much a “work in progress.”

    We have in place a strategic plan for standards-based reform, at the core of which is the implementation of a truly statewide assessment and accountability system. Recently, we have undertaken major revisions of our plan to conform our efforts to the requirements of the “No Child Left Behind Act of 2001” (Public Law 107-110), which
    was signed into law on Jan. 8, 2002.

    These new requirements are substantial and will necessitate considerable effort and investment on our part. Future editions of both this Superintendent’s Report on School Performance
    and Improvement and the School Status and Improvement Reports will include our progress toward the federal goal of having all children meet high standards of educational achievement.

    ”Highlights of the Report”

    *SCOPE. The report for school year 2000-01 covers public education in kindergarten through 12th grade, including data from 254 regular public schools and 6 public charter schools in the seven administrative districts in Hawaii.

    *ENROLLMENT. Overall enrollment growth, which had exceeded 1.5 percent for the five years from 1991-92 through 1995-96, has ended for now. After peaking in 1995-96, overall enrollment has declined in the last two years. However, schools are still experiencing the effects of population shifts, especially the westward movement of population on Oahu.

    *SPECIAL NEEDS. The numbers of students in need of special services are increasing much more rapidly than the population of students at large. These students are those from poor economic circumstances, those with limited English proficiency, and those who need special education services. Students with these special needs have increased in numbers by 40 to 100 percent in the last decade. This means that the task facing public schools is steadily becoming more difficult and more costly.

    *STAFFING. Hawaii has a relatively high pupil-to-teacher ratio, which has remained stable since 1992-93 while the ratios of other states have declined. Hawaii has fewer of its professional staff performing administrative functions than comparison states. Shortages of both teachers and administrators are looming, as many certificated personnel will become eligible for retirement within a few years.

    *FINANCE. The state’s commitment to public education has persistently lagged behind that of other states. Hawaii is among the top ten states in combined state and local expenditures per capita, but it ranks last in the percentage of state and local expenditures allocated to public schools. Hawaii is the only state that funds its public schools from state revenues without using local government funds.

    *FACILITIES. Hawaii has made great progress in easing classroom shortages in the last six years; only Leeward and Maui Districts still have net shortages of classrooms. However, schools’ library facilities are chronically underdeveloped; almost half of our schools have inadequate library space. The state’s schools remain among the largest in the nation.

    *National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Hawaii’s 4th and 8th grade students performed about the same on the 2000 NAEP mathematics assessment as they did in 1996. Their performance on the 2000 NAEP science assessment was at or near the bottom of the states participating. (Pages 27-30)

    *DROPOUTS AND SCHOOL COMPLETION. Dropout rates for students in grades 9-12 average about 5.1 percent per year. The estimated cumulative dropout rate is just under 20 percent, nearly twice the Hawaii and national goal of 10 percent or less

    Drug Testing of Students Proposed by Senate President, Endorsed by Governor-Following the Federal Funding May Offer Some Explanation for This Out-of-left-field Proposal

    0

    Laura Brown Image The days of rulers rapped across students’ knuckles to enforce discipline in schools are gone. Now, according to federal and state officials, children have gone hog wild and are using tobacco, alcohol and drugs. Hawaii has a plan to bring them under control: Drug test every one of them. This is the proposal of Hawaii Senate President Robert Bunda, referred to by Gov. Linda Lingle in her Jan. 21, 2003, State of the State address as an idea that has merit. For those in the audience who thought the idea came out of left field, they need only follow the money that precedes the idea, back to the hand that feeds our state — the federal government. The U.S. Departments of Education, Justice and Health and Human Services recently announced more than $80 million in grants to 46 communities to prevent aggressive and violent behavior and drug and alcohol use among the nation’s youth through the Safe Schools/Healthy Students (SSHS) Program. This collaboration among the three federal agencies heaps education, mental health, social service, law enforcement and juvenile justice all onto the plate of local public schools. “We know from our work with the U.S. Secret Service and from other research that the best way to deal with youth who are troubled is through the development of a comprehensive strategy that involves schools, mental health providers and law enforcement,” U.S. Secretary of Education Rod Paige said. “It is absolutely critical to bring mental health professionals, school officials and law enforcement to the table to address the issue of safe schools. The SSHS grants do just that.” It is more likely that at the most these programs merely expand the profits of drug testing and research companies while violating students’ right to privacy, and stretching school and taxpayer resources to the breaking point. As Hawaii faces budget cuts and deficits, why spend scarce resources on drug testing? Hawaii is still reeling from the Felix Consent Decree spurred by federal research on methods to reduce the costs of mental health care nationally. In 1993, the Children’s Mental Health Services (CMHS) arm of Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) division under the federal Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) embarked on the Children and Their Families research project in 22 states, including Hawaii. Unsuccessful attempts by local agencies and principal investigators to replace qualified mental health care with bogus “fix the family” treatments resulted in the federal court’s intervention to force Hawaii to shift the responsibility for child mental health services to public schools. The Legislature had no choice but to comply. Hawaii Session Laws, Act 91 (1999) required the Departments of Education and Health to do just that. This move resulted in the state agencies’ inability to collect Medicaid payments under the School Based Behavioral Health model, the exodus of qualified mental health personnel to other states, teacher and administrator burnout, exploding education budgets and, most frightening of all, damaged children and families. ‘Lesson Goes Unlearned by Local Legislators’ The promise by Lingle that drug testing would be “voluntary” and “preventative” not “punitive” is not reflected in bills making drug testing mandatory for enrollment in public school. HB1297 would require the identification of drug users, followed by counseling and treatment. This would miraculously improve student academic performance by reducing retention, suspension and expulsion rates, while deterring high school students from a life of crime. More importantly though, in conformance to requirements of the federal grant, Hawaii’s schools must perform a needs assessment and create an integrated database of information on the prevalence of drug use and the level of need for services. Twenty-five percent of all students would be tested. In other words, schools would perform a research marketing survey for predatory mainland consultants to come sell their services to solve Hawaii’s youth drug “crisis.” Would a consent decree — a la Felix — follow? Another bill to watch is SB1471, requiring the testing of all public school children using urinalysis. (This is in a public school system that is known for its lack of toilet paper.) Educators and staff would be “trained” on how to spot users of illicit drugs. (Putting that training in “best practices” for reading on hold.) SB 716 allows for the expulsion of children selling or using “intoxicating” liquor or drugs and allows for random drug testing of all public school children. A student may be tested even if he “reasonably appears” to have used illicit substances. If a student tests positive, the principal may refer the student to a treatment program, bypassing parental consent. SB 1471 prefers the hair testing method to be done on all students within the first 20 school days of each school year. Students who test positive will have another drug test 90 days later. The Department of Health will be in charge of student and family drug surveys. Students who are eligible for free and reduced lunch will get a discount on their drug testing. ”Next Rotten Apple: Hawaii’s Education Beat will explore the costs of drug testing.” ”Laura Brown is the education reporter for HawaiiReporter.com and can be reached via email at” mailto:LauraBrown@hawaii.rr.com