Friday, April 26, 2024
More
    Home Blog Page 1932

    Encryption-We All Use it

    0

    “Alan headshot Image”

    There has been an effort to from post-September 11th, to amend the Patriot Act regarding encryption. Before I get into the implications of this proposed amendment of the Patriot Act, let’s look into some of the more popular encryption programs:

    PGP — Pretty Good Privacy Originally created by Philip Zimmerman. Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) provides a method to encrypt data files on your computer. It is very popular program to send e-mail confidentially. Sending “un-encrypted” email is like sending a postcard. With PGP, it’s still sending a postcard, except only the recipient can read it. And no, it’s not illegal, it’s called privacy.

    The time needed to break (decode) a 2048 bit PGP encryption is 3 billion-billion years. The outside estimate of the age of the universe is 20 billion years.

    DES and Triple-DES — Data Encryption Standard (1977) DES is a 56-bit encryption process, and Triple-DES encrypts the data three times (Triple). It is still in use for securing data for a commercial (Banking, retail) and government (NSA, military, CIA, FBI) organizations. It has been shown that it takes about 20 hours for a super-computer to break a single DES encryption. If a supercomputer could break a single DES encryption in one second, it would take a billion years to break a Triple-DES message.

    AES — Advance Encryption Standard (1997) Though Triple-DES is, to say the least, difficult to break, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) saw the need to create an even higher encryption process, the Advance Encryption Standard (AES), which has encryptions of 128, 192, and 256-bit. If Triple-DES could be cracked in a billion years, AES would take a 149 trillion (149 thousand-billion) years.

    Two things bring up this article about encryption: First we are all using encryption knowingly and unknowingly in our daily lives: Talking on our digital cell phones, punching in our ATM code, purchasing items on the Internet, doing a bank wire transfer, or even local credit card purchases.

    Second, the proposed amendment to the Patriot Act wants to add a five year prison sentence for using encryption in a willful and knowing way while committing a felony. This is in a similar vein of thought as the punishment for using a firearm while robbing a bank. It is not the same. It is a knee-jerk reaction with unintended and far-reaching consequences. It is similar to the proposed three strikes bill running though the Hawaii Legislature, but that is another story.

    Law enforcement has not been hampered by encryption over the Internet, and criminals will continue to use easier and more obvious methods to commit felonies. The 9/11 hijackers did not use encryption in their e-mails, they didn’t have to. With e-mail traffic estimated at 24 Billion each week, it is really just trying to filter it. Knowing where to look is the issue. In the end, why support an amendment that has more potential for harm and mis-use (remember, we all use encryption), and give our politicians credit for solving a problem that never was.

    Oh, by the way, here’s my credit card number, knock yourself out, 1 second, 2 second . 1 day, 1 month, 1 year ..30 Billion-billion years:

    —–BEGIN PGP MESSAGE—–

    qDdGgXFS7K6osQB/9fRIOqUQqYzmvUlQEJdOIwIQPGAjtcYyHnrDBMzAmLjYjcbPzsz6l

    AyYX4wupzRTRovHUoVTJjteonVjT5lklcW5VWwfaHszDz8GjgSqVAXPAtz1hNCUqZoQ2N

    KYzw+agBKqh+7IGO86vtT+BI/CcZeU/+zi1h+2ZmHIQvomf39MpMG+vVNdpEMfXytAZmY

    UlsXWElGrrNih5U8iULoo0NgO/4jFovuoaD9yWWYnshr6NesY0R1Y9On1C2LKqEfOCKw7

    aQZbW1F8NXw9C1oY3sJQwE1Y7UfQwEj48XydjSa5gqHFBnlPtloxye64jQXuqkc6EjZ8G

    NK3yy4UODpfI6CADQdYoDeQv0LSGGmDMnuIE8le0/P26t0jm4rqF3NKS36mgzK0opqNUN

    eJPRd2W3OrQqy3dMaACvLaSrR7S7Joi2wmzKeyDjiNkpcB0yJJS9CZhmZ5/v2a9absca3

    PJZ0Jwwhbkgg5ikSAvGl+LsgR1fKgtFwT9Lln5aUCjkwSH/cUEcwQY6435wI+gk9I5tRR

    6Gf9GljmJdtYhafOq/qSzN1kSLOkazGbnMp13fFhdxBJYHFcg1xzXMt5Z+RpTlaaGhTvk

    g5LvpNMSRIy8dkG0WfQump64zl2fGCNFTsqOx8vTieCLYVXL/kKSnZZO6G19HVpLBBswv

    ez8qzchW9x5pySxK9gJHgIiBUezIDU1TDFFjWUGk0MucoS9RIq2TVpmJ6BC112Ff7Lc5g

    rV/Tw===HyzK

    —–END PGP MESSAGE—–

    Grassroot Perspective – April 14, 2003-Big Fat Number; Wal-Mart Flower; Blues-Most Uninsured Can Get Coverage Already; Role of Religion in Early Business Solutions

    0

    “Dick Rowland Image”

    ”Shoots (News, Views and Quotes)”

    – Big Fat Number

    Is there fat and then Asian fat? Do Asians get obese at lower levels of
    fat than other folks do? And if that is true, might it also be true
    that, say, black folks and white folks get fat differently from one
    another? In short, could it be that all the hard and fast rules about
    diet and obesity are hopelessly simplistic?

    These questions are raised by plans to redefine the definition of
    obesity downward based on information from the World Health
    Organization. The WHO is notoriously flaky on such matters, but there
    seems to be some evidence that Asians become at risk for diabetes at
    lower levels of body fat than non-Asians. This higher risk for diabetes,
    the thinking goes, should be accompanied by an official label of “obese”
    for people with that level of body fat.

    But public health types seem to always want to make any given “at-risk
    population” numbers larger, whether or not that actually helps people
    stay healthy. (That strategy helps ramp up spending for those very same
    public health bureaucracies to play with.)

    The official body-mass numbers already dismiss individual differences in
    muscle mass and bone density, resulting in categories of “fit” natural
    only for tri-athletes and runway models. The result is the body mass
    index stuff is just laughed off as obviously ridiculous. Lower it still
    further and the public will tune out obesity talk for years.

    https://www.post-gazette.com/healthscience/20030317fat0317p5.asp

    – Wal-Mart Flower

    South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford (R) drew snickers for daring to suggest
    that his state government try to run itself like Wal-Mart. Blue smocks,
    greeter at the door, huge cans of cheese doodles. Ha ha. But Sanford
    gets it.

    Wal-Mart is alternately mocked and derided as the big-box killer of
    small towns, bringer of asphalt, and fake, plastic consumer culture, and
    as the temple of redneck America, all double-wides, gun racks, and
    stretch pants. This plays into common prejudices against both
    megamarketing and the hopelessly vulgar people who support it. But those
    casual insults miss the key to Wal-Mart’s success: the tremendous effort
    it puts into the back-end of its operation.

    Wal-Mart was years ahead of the curve in trying to streamline and
    rationalize its logistics and supply chain, squeezing profits out of
    improved efficiencies that compounded over time. This is precisely the
    area where state and local government (forget the feds, they’re
    hopeless) could stand to make huge improvements and save tons of
    taxpayer money.

    Many state organizations have no idea how much they spend on a given
    component of their end product, let alone how to spend less. The recent
    revelation that many states have cell phone bills running out of control
    is a perfect example. Since the added value of cell phones was never
    defined — probably not even considered — cost literally became no
    object.

    Wal-Mart, though, knows its costs down to the penny. It knows its costs
    and it knows its customers. That allows Wal-Mart to hit its target more
    times than not. Governments are constrained by not having as good a
    feedback loop as a market to provide the same kind of info, but Sanford
    is right to wonder if government couldn’t at least try to act like costs
    and customers matter.

    https://www.charleston.net/stories/031303/sta_13sanford.shtml

    Above articles are quoted from Reason Express, Reason’s Weekly Dispatch
    March 18, 2003 Vol.6 No.11

    – Blues-Most Uninsured Can Get Coverage Already

    By Greg Scandlen (mailto:galen@galen.org) Consumer Choice Matters #6

    Just in time, a couple of reports have come out discussing some of the nitty-gritty numbers behind the uninsured. The Blue Cross Blue Shield Association has release a study of “The Uninsured in America” that finds the population more diverse than is often thought. Of the 41 million uninsured, more than 14 million already are eligible for Medicaid or SCHIP but haven’t enrolled; more than 15 million have incomes of $50,000 or more and could purchase coverage if they thought it was valuable; and 5.7 million are short-term uninsured, often people between jobs or recent college graduates. The report notes that 5.2 million of the eligible but unenrolled live in just three states — California, Texas and New York. It also points out that the greatest growth in the uninsured is in people earning $75,000+, rising 70 percent from 1999-2001. Only 8.2 million are long term uninsured, too poor to afford coverage and ineligible for public programs. The paper proposes giving tax credits to employers to enroll their low-income workers, but that idea misses the real lessons in these numbers — many people do not like to be in government programs, many others do not find value in existing private coverage, and many others are not associated with an employer. The solution to all three groups could be tax credits to individuals (not employers), so they can purchase the coverage they prefer and value.

    ”Roots (Food for Thought)”

    – Role of Religion in Early Business Solutions

    A World of Ideas

    By Leonard P. Liggio

    During the coming season of Passover and Easter, it is useful to examine
    the relationship between religion and economics. Several think tanks,
    including the Minaret of Freedom (founded by Dean Ahmad), Toward
    Tradition (founded by Rabbi Daniel Lapin), and the Acton Institute for
    the Study of Religion and Liberty (founded by Father Robert Sirico) are
    engaged in this work. On the back cover of this Investor Report, we
    share early correspondence about plans for the development of Acton, for
    which Alex Chafuen and I became founding trustees.

    In this column, however, I would like to focus attention on one
    particular example of recent scholarship that has contributed to our
    understanding of the rise of modern economic institutions. Professor
    Avner Grief (Stanford University), a recipient of a prestigious
    five-year fellowship from the MacArthur Foundation, has identified how
    the problem of agency – creating trust among unfamiliar partners – was
    overcome to enable a vast expansion of international trade during the
    eleventh century.

    Professor Grief’s scholarship has centered upon the Geniza documents,
    commercial agreements among Jewish merchants in Cairo from the 9th to
    13th centuries AD. Since the name of God was stated in these agreements,
    they took on sacred status and could not be destroyed. These papyri were
    deposited in the storeroom (geniza in Persian, derived from the Arabic
    word kanz for treasure) of the Old Synagogue of Old Cairo, then were
    removed unsystematically in the late nineteenth century, and ended in
    five great collections and other smaller ones.

    These documents show that the Jewish merchants of the period, called
    Magrabi (or western) traders, were doing business with the emirates of
    Tunis and Palermo (to the west) and Baghdad, Aden and India (to the
    east). In the words of Avner Grief: “The geniza contains more than one
    thousand documents which reflect the eleventh-century Mediterranean
    trade. These documents depict this trade as free, private, and
    competitive. The authorities’ stance with respect to international trade
    reflected the tolerance and liberalism that characterized the period.
    Moslem rulers, especially the Fatimids (who ruled North Africa, Sicily,
    Egypt, and Palestine), sought to promote trade and no official
    restrictions fettered migration or the transfer of raw material,
    finished goods, or money across the Mediterranean. Both transportation
    and mail delivery were competitive and largely private, and shipping was
    available even to a small merchant, who could rent storage space on a
    ship. The trade within each trade center was free and competitive, with
    many buyers and sellers interacting in bazaars and storehouses, where
    they negotiated and competed over prices, using brokers, open-bid
    auctions, and direct negotiations.”(1)

    But how did this trade take place, given the problem of agency — the
    risk that one partner in the enterprise would disappear with goods or
    money? It was common at the time for an older partner to contribute 2/3
    of the capital for a trading venture, with a younger partner
    contributing 1/3 as well as his time and trouble to travel abroad. The
    simplest solution, even today, is to limit one’s financial partners to
    one’s own family.

    The Geniza documents show that Maghribi traders used the common bond of
    shared religious and family ties to expand the circle of agents with
    whom they could trust in trading ventures. Often the younger partner
    selected, was, when not a son, a nephew. Since the younger partner was
    tied so closely to the capitalist by synagogue and family bonds,
    defection was made very costly and permanent, as one could not ever
    return to one’s community whether in Cairo or where ever Maghribi
    traders resided.

    There are seven thousand self-contained Geniza documents, mostly written
    in Arabic with Hebrew letters. Many are partnerships or contracts made
    in a formal declaration; others are rabbinical court cases adjudicating
    disputes. The most accessible source of these documents is the
    six-volume collection, A Mediterranean Society: The Jewish Communities
    of the Arab World as Portrayed in the Cairo Geniza, edited by the late
    S. D. Goitein (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1967),
    reissued in paperback in 1999. Goitein notes that:

    “…the most common type of literature found in the Geniza, the
    so-called responsa, or “answers” of authoritative scholars on questions
    of religious, legal, or general character addressed to them. The
    responses and their Muslim counterparts, the fatwa’s, or opinions of the
    muftis, were collected in books, which, in Judaism and Islam, fulfill a
    role similar to collections of cases and decisions of high courts in
    English and American law …the responsa of Moses Maimonides
    (1135-1204)(2) and his son Abraham (1186-1237)… [were actually] legal
    decisions in the Geniza synagogue” (S.D. Goitein, A Mediterranean
    Society, pp. 13-14).

    The enduring importance of religion in economics remains a fruitful area
    for study. In medieval open society, markets flourished on the basis of
    personal and family reputation. From credibility to global brands,
    personal judgments determine the failure or success of an enterprise.(3)

    (1) Avner Grief, “Reputations and Coalitions in Medieval Trade: Evidence
    of the Maghribi Traders,” The Journal of Economic History, Vol. XLIL,
    no. 4 (Dec., 1989); reprinted in Daniel Klein, ed., Reputation: Studies
    in the Voluntary Elicitation of Good Conduct (Series in Economics,
    Cognition and Society, edited by Timur Kuran), Ann Arbor, Michigan,
    University of Michigan Press, 1997, p. 140.
    (2) Moses Maimonides was born in Cordoba, Spain, and spent much of his
    life in Cairo where he served as physician to the Sultan, Saladin, who
    replaced the Fatimids. As a renowned scholar, one who acknowledged his
    philosophical debt to Aristotle yet strove to preserve and order Jewish
    learning with respect to the divine law, he had a great influence on
    medieval thought.
    (3) For a contemporary example, regarding how rabbinical courts and
    exclusion animate relations among New York’s Jewish diamond dealers, see
    Lisa Bernstein, “Opting out of the Legal System: Extralegal Contractual
    Relations in the Diamond Industry,” Journal of Legal Studies (vol. 21,
    1992, pp. 115-57).

    Above article is quoted from Atlas Economic Research Foundation, Atlas
    Investor Report Spring 2003 www.atlasusa.org

    ”Evergreen (Today’s Quotes)”

    “Cato is now the hot policy shop, respected for not compromising its
    core beliefs even when they get in the way of practical politics.”
    — Washington Post

    “Cato has helped change the terms of debate by challenging Washington’s
    conventional wisdom with a provocative appeal for the future.”
    — Newsweek

    ”’Edited by Richard O. Rowland, president of Grassroot Institute of Hawaii. He can be reached at (808) 487-4959 or by email at:”’ mailto:grassroot@hawaii.rr.com ”’For more information, see its Web site at:”’ https://www.grassrootinstitute.org/

    From Planning Ahead to Resisting Marriage

    0

    “Suzanne Gelb Image”

    ”Future Travel – Why Not Now?”

    Dear Dr. Gelb:

    Why is it that before I go to a social event or something professional where I need to participate, I rehearse many scenarios in my mind of what the event will be like, so that I’m living a lot in the future. The event usually doesn’t turn out like I had rehearsed, but still it is hard to let go of all the thinking ahead. Any thoughts?

    Forward to the Future

    Dear Future:

    It is difficult to predict the outcome of an event or what one may experience that will call on one’s professional expertise or social skills. The rehearsing is often a result of self-doubt and fear of perhaps making a fool of oneself. Acknowledgment of one’s skills and abilities invariably triggers needed self-confidence to be able to speak extemporaneously on topics related to one’s skills and abilities.

    ”Engaged – Is it Forever?”

    Dear Dr. Gelb:

    My fianc

    Legislative Hearing Notices – April 14, 2003

    0

    The following hearing notices, which are subject to change, were sorted and taken from the Hawaii State Capitol Web site. Please check that site for updates and/or changes to the schedule at

    “Hawaii State Legislature Sidebar”

    Go there and click on the Hearing Date to view the Hearing Notice.

    Hearings notices for both House and Senate measures in all committees:

    Hearing

    ”Date Time Bill Number Measure Title Committee”

    4/14/03 9:15 AM HCR96 CONTINUING THE JOINT SENATE-HOUSE INVESTIGATIVE COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE THE STATE’S EFFORTS TO COMPLY WITH THE FELIX CONSENT DECREE. JHW

    4/14/03 9:15 AM HCR119 HD1 REQUESTING THE DEPARTMENT OF HAWAIIAN HOME LANDS TO REVIEW THE SALE OF LEASES AND SUBMIT RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE LEGISLATURE FOR THE ADOPTION OF POLICIES THAT ARE FAIR TO AWARDEES, LEASE PURCHASERS, AND TO THE STATE. JHW

    4/14/03 9:15 AM HCR198 HD1 SUPPORTING THE PRESERVATION OF THE HAWAIIAN LANGUAGE AND THE PERPETUATION OF ITS STUDY AND USE. JHW/EDU

    ”Date Time Bill Number Measure Title Committee”

    4/14/03 1:15 PM HCR31 REQUESTING STRONG SUPPORT BY CONGRESS FOR TITLE IX, THE PATSY TAKEMOTO MINK EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IN EDUCATION ACT. EDU

    4/14/03 1:15 PM HCR146 REQUESTING MEMBERS OF HAWAII’S CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION TO WORK TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL FUNDS NECESSARY TO MEET THE MANDATES OF THE FEDERAL “NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT OF 2001”. EDU

    4/14/03 1:15 PM HCR160 HD1 DESIGNATING APRIL AS “FINANCIAL LITERACY FOR YOUTH IN HAWAII MONTH.” EDU

    ”Date Time Bill Number Measure Title Committee”

    4/14/03 2:45 PM GM287 Submitting for consideration and confirmation to the Civil Defense Advisory Council, Gubernatorial Nominee CAPTAIN GERALD L. COFFEE, for a term to expire 06-30-07. TMG

    4/14/03 2:45 PM HCR20 AFFIRMING THE LEGISLATURE’S COMMITMENT TO HUMAN RIGHTS, CIVIL LIBERTIES, AND ALL PROTECTIONS GUARANTEED BY THE CONSTITUTIONS OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE STATE OF HAWAII, AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL CHARTERS AND COVENANTS. TMG/JHW

    4/14/03 2:45 PM HCR26 HD1 REQUESTING THE SPEAKER OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO EDUCATE AND SENSITIZE MEMBERS OF CONGRESS ON THE UNFORTUNATE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE INTERNMENT OF CIVILIANS DURING WORLD WAR II. TMG/JHW

    ”Date Time Bill Number Measure Title Committee”

    4/14/03 4:00 PM GM306 Submitting for consideration and confirmation to the Statewide Independent Living Council, Gubernatorial Nominee DIANA C. TIZARD, for a term to expire 06-30-05. HMS

    ”Date Time Bill Number Measure Title Committee”

    4/14/03 4:15 PM SR50 URGING THE GOVERNOR TO CONVENE A TASK FORCE TO ADDRESS THE CONTINUAL NEED AND UNMET DEMAND FOR TRANSITIONAL HOUSING FACILITIES ON OAHU. HMS

    ”’To reach legislators, see:”’ “Representatives at a Glance” and “Senators at a Glance”

    Newly Elected Hawaii Congressman Ed Case Looks for Ways to Help Hawaii Businesses, Schools-He'll Meet with Small Business Owners at Today's Small Business Hawaii Meeting – Public Invited

    0

    U.S. Rep. Ed Case has a great deal of news to share with the people of Hawaii. Elected to office just months ago, Case already has been appointed at his request to the small business and education/labor committees in Congress, and is finding ways from his Washington base to make improvements in Hawaii’s business climate and public education system.

    But he is always looking for more input, new ideas and feedback from his constituents.

    That is why, while in Hawaii next week, he plans to meet with small business owners at the Small Business Hawaii Sunrise Breakfast meeting, Tuesday, April 15, from 7 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. at the Pacific Club. The meeting is open to Small Business Hawaii members, their guests and the public.

    Case, a former winner of the Small Business Hawaii “Legislator of the Year” award, has been in office for just four months. He won his congressional seat after two special elections held in November 2002 and January 2003 to find a replacement for Congresswoman Patsy Mink who died while in office Sept. 28, 2002.

    Formerly in the Hawaii State Legislature representing the Manoa district in the House of Representatives for 8 years, Case, a veteran politician, made a failed attempt for the governor’s seat in 2002 before winning the two special elections for the Hawaii Second Congressional seat.

    He had a strategy from the beginning of his campaign for Congress — to win both elections so he’d have seniority over other newly elected members of Congress, essentially because he’d be elected one month before all other freshman members.

    When it came time for committee assignments to be handed out in Congress, Case jumped ahead of 53 other newly elected congress members to get the committee assignments he wanted — the small business and education and labor committees.

    ”’For more information on Case’s talk scheduled for April 15 at 7 a.m., call Small Business Hawaii at 396-1724 or email at:”’ mailto:sbh@lava.net ”’Small Business Hawaii members and their guests are $20 and all others are $30. Reservations must be made in advance.”’

    Newly Elected Hawaii Congressman Ed Case Looks for Ways to Help Hawaii Businesses, Schools-He’ll Meet with Small Business Owners at Today’s Small Business Hawaii Meeting – Public Invited

    0

    U.S. Rep. Ed Case has a great deal of news to share with the people of Hawaii. Elected to office just months ago, Case already has been appointed at his request to the small business and education/labor committees in Congress, and is finding ways from his Washington base to make improvements in Hawaii’s business climate and public education system.

    But he is always looking for more input, new ideas and feedback from his constituents.

    That is why, while in Hawaii next week, he plans to meet with small business owners at the Small Business Hawaii Sunrise Breakfast meeting, Tuesday, April 15, from 7 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. at the Pacific Club. The meeting is open to Small Business Hawaii members, their guests and the public.

    Case, a former winner of the Small Business Hawaii “Legislator of the Year” award, has been in office for just four months. He won his congressional seat after two special elections held in November 2002 and January 2003 to find a replacement for Congresswoman Patsy Mink who died while in office Sept. 28, 2002.

    Formerly in the Hawaii State Legislature representing the Manoa district in the House of Representatives for 8 years, Case, a veteran politician, made a failed attempt for the governor’s seat in 2002 before winning the two special elections for the Hawaii Second Congressional seat.

    He had a strategy from the beginning of his campaign for Congress — to win both elections so he’d have seniority over other newly elected members of Congress, essentially because he’d be elected one month before all other freshman members.

    When it came time for committee assignments to be handed out in Congress, Case jumped ahead of 53 other newly elected congress members to get the committee assignments he wanted — the small business and education and labor committees.

    ”’For more information on Case’s talk scheduled for April 15 at 7 a.m., call Small Business Hawaii at 396-1724 or email at:”’ mailto:sbh@lava.net ”’Small Business Hawaii members and their guests are $20 and all others are $30. Reservations must be made in advance.”’

    No New Taxes! No New Taxes!-Public Rally Set to Protest Unprecedented $430 Million Tax Hike on State Taxpayers

    0

    “Malia Lt Blue top Image”

    No New Taxes! No New Taxes!

    That will be the war cry by small business owners and other concerned citizens at the “No New Taxes” rally on April 17 from 6 a.m. to 10 a.m. at the Hawaii State Capitol.

    Outraged by the plan by Hawaii Democrat lawmakers to raise state taxes an unprecedented $430 million a year, Rick Hamada, morning talk show host on KHVH, is coordinating the rally and is urging small business owners and concerned citizens to join the protest rally scheduled during Hamada’s morning broadcast.

    This is the second rally he’s helped coordinate this month to help send lawmakers a message that the Hawaii citizenry will not stand for another series of tax increases, especially since Hawaii already is the fourth highest taxed state in the nation, and the proposed increases will take Hawaii to first in the nation.

    Democrats, with a few exceptions in the Senate, voted to raise Hawaii’s taxes by $430 million through three proposals, including a 12.5 percent increase in the general excise tax ($180 million); a 7-year plan that imposes a monthly tax on anyone with business interests, land ownership or residency in Hawaii to fund a socialist long-term care government fund ($100 million +); and to give the Honolulu City & County the right to tax anyone purchasing goods on Oahu an additional 1 percent sales tax in addition to the 4.5 percent general excise tax they increased ($120 million). Democrats in the House are supporting both the long-term care tax increase and the new county sales tax proposal.

    The governor says she is not planning to support legislation that will increase taxes, however Democrat lawmakers are already counting the number of votes they have so they can override her vetoes.

    Hamada coordinated a similar all out “No New Taxes” protest in 1998 over then Gov. Benjamin Cayetano’s proposal to raise the state’s general excise taxes.

    Hundreds of people turned out to what was deemed the “Hawaii Tea Party,” and Hamada and others who attended the rally were credited with sending an effective message to lawmakers that ultimately helped kill the tax increase proposal.

    Bob Twogood, owner of Twogood Kayaks and Canoes Hawaii, a Kailua-based business that sells and rents high performance and recreational kayaks and canoes and offers paddling lessons, attended the 1998 rally and is planning to go to the April 17 protest.

    Twogood says in 1998, he shut down his store, pulled his kids from school, and recruited his employees and family members to attend the Hawaii Tea Party.

    “Most people do not get involved in politics. But the only way the politicians will respond to what citizens want is if citizens get involved and send lawmakers a message,” Twogood says. “We must help create an awareness for others in the community so they will realize what is being proposed and take action.”

    Twogood says he is adamantly opposed to lawmakers raising taxes when Hawaii is already the forth highest taxed state in the nation, and while government is so “inefficient and ineffective.” He plans to shut down his store for the morning of April 17 and give his employees the morning off if they will agree to attend the rally. He also will take his children out of school during the morning of April 17 so they can benefit from a “good civics lesson” and he will encourage the management of his children’s school to take all of the students to the state Capitol that morning so they can learn one of the most important lessons in life: an engaged citizenry is of utmost importance and can impact decisions made by government leaders that affect their lives and businesses.

    HawaiiReporter.com staff and supporters will attend the rally, along with members of Small Business Hawaii, the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii and the Hawaii Realtors Association.

    ”’Those attending are asked to bring protest signs and old No New Taxes shirts from the 1998 rally. Anyone wanting a new No New Tax shirt at a cost of $12 can call HawaiiReporter.com at 524-4500 before the event. No shirts will be sold on state property. There is a limited supply.”’

    Will Anyone Notice the Irony?

    The problem for socialist liberals is that they refute their own policies without meaning to do so. A recent report by the University of Washington is a case in point.

    The report states that the “bare-minimum costs” for living in Hawaii are three times that of the federal standard for poverty. The intent of the study is clearly to justify further wealth redistribution in the form of social programs on the part of government but has real implications for the current legislative session. To quote KITV’s HawaiiChannel.com, “The goal of the study is to help state policy makers to be more realistic when trying to lift Hawaii families out of poverty.”

    https://www.thehawaiichannel.com/news/2102694/detail.html

    And there is the following from the HonoluluAdvertiser article on the same report, “To bridge that gap, the report recommends opening access to job training and education, subsidized child care, housing, health care and food stamps to low-wage workers.” In other words, increase socialist programs and welfare spending.

    https://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2003/Apr/10/bz/bz07a.html

    Thus the report says it costs a family of three over $50,000 to meet its basic needs while the federal poverty level for the same family is a mere $17,550. It seeks to bolster the justification for the aforementioned increased subsidies for the poor on the basis of this disparity. But there is another conclusion that can be drawn. Every penny taken in taxes is that much less for meeting the “bare-minimum” costs of living in this state. In this case, it is robbing Paul to give back to Paul. It simply makes no sense.

    According to the report a single adult would need to earn $10.71 an hour to be self-sufficient, second only to San Francisco. That means a single person would have to make over $22,000 a year just to meet the “bare-minimum.’ One wonders how much of this goes for taxes, but with the tax structure in this state it must be considerable.

    Now this is where it gets interesting. Our Democrat-controlled Legislature is considering increasing every tax and fee possible, in the face of a cost of living that is three times the federal poverty guidelines. They are going to intentionally increase that poverty by taking even more of individual income in the form of increased taxes.

    The increases in the General Excise Tax, the misnamed Long-Term-Care Tax, the proposed City Sales Tax authority, the increase in the Motor Vehicle Registration Fees, and the plethora of other fee increases are all considered to be regressive taxes. This means that the poorer one is, the more punishing these taxes are and the more they will impoverish precisely those who can least afford it. In addition, it will increase the cost of living in a city and state where that cost of living is already prohibitive, as documented by a socialist liberal study.

    The fact that the cost of living is documented to be so high in Hawaii should, for any logical person, preclude any further tax increases as being detrimental to the poorest, most unfortunate among us. In their quest to pander to the poor the Democrat majority in this state’s Legislature would do real damage to the livelihood of the very constituency they claim to intend to help. Every tax increase now being considered will take money out of pockets of those very people that other socialists have documented as being below the poverty line and already struggling to merely survive. This whole scenario is clearly self contradictory.

    It is time to point out the Democrat majority assertions that these tax increases are for the benefit of the people of Hawaii is false. They are not. They simply cannot be. The cost of living here is so high already that any and every tax increase is going to be far more punitive to the general population than any possible benefit.

    Even with the income tax deduction, which was reported to have been reduced from the $100 originally proposed to $80 when finally passed by the Senate, the cost to the individual by the GET, the General Excise Tax, will never be offset by this deduction. The hidden wholesale costs of the GET means that most people will never see the tax increase that actually comes directly out of their pocket. They will just notice prices will increase for everything they buy and it will get harder to make ends meet. The GET will tax far more than just the 4.5 percent they pay retail at the counter. It is truly a highly sophisticated shell game.

    The stated reason for the increase in GET is to increase funding for schools. If that is the case then why isn’t the whole $180 million being allocated to the schools instead of only $120 million, with the remaining $60 million going into the general fund? This is plainly disingenuous. It is transparent misdirection. It is simply a tax increase, plain and simple.

    In the face of this study these tax increases are clearly ill considered. One has to ask to what degree the high cost of living documented is directly due to the current GET and high tax policies with which the Democrat majority has already saddled this state. When is one of the socialist liberal university studies going to get around to exploring this question? The answer is never, the truth is too terrible to contemplate.

    To return to the final line of the KITV article, “The goal of the study is to help state policy makers to be more realistic when trying to lift Hawaii families out of poverty.” What would be the most realistic thing to do to lift Hawaii families out of poverty? Leave more money in their pockets instead of taxing it to fund one boondoggle after another. Don’t increase excise taxes, income taxes, bus passes, motor vehicle registrations, city taxes, and every other fee possible. Let the people keep the money they have worked so hard to earn.

    Stop punishing businesses by taxing them to the point that it becomes a choice between paying those taxes or giving employees wage increases. Stop taxing everything that moves so that it becomes nearly impossible to successfully run a business in this state. Stop insisting that the only solution to the problems in this state is for government to spend ever increasing amounts of money.

    Linda Lingle was elected governor on a platform pledge not to raise taxes. If these resolutions pass then she will have to veto them, although she has refused to say she that so far. If she does, the Democrats will scream bloody murder about her not caring about the poor, not caring about education, not caring about the needs of the state. They will scream about cuts that are, in fact, not cuts but reductions in spending increases. Mostly they will just scream.

    If she doesn’t veto these proposals then she will be regaled as a hypocrite who can’t keep her campaign pledges, who couldn’t even honor her own platform. What the Democrats are attempting to do is set up a scenario where they can attack Gov. Lingle no matter what she does, whichever path she takes she loses. That is what this is really all about, it is a cynical struggle for political power.

    The best case scenario is also the worst case scenario. The Democrats pass these bills, Gov. Lingle vetoes them, and the Democrats override the vetoes. Taxes will go up, living here will become even more difficult, more people will leave in disgust, more people will go into slip into poverty, more businesses will go bankrupt or pull up anchor and leave altogether, and the general economic condition of the islands will deteriorate.

    The connection between this economic deterioration and the Democrat Party’s insistence on increasing taxes will be inescapable. They will no longer be able to hoodwink the people into thinking it is due to anything other than their insistence upon implementing their socialist spending schemes. It will simply not be possible to take hundreds of millions of dollars out of this economy without doing great damage to it. And this time they won’t be able to escape the responsibility of causing that damage. It will be too obvious.

    So the economy of Hawaii will sink. The Democrats will do irreparable damage to their party in the process and the state will move even further to the right, as it has demonstrated at tendency to do the last two election cycles. The harm on a personal scale will be terrible and it will take years to repair, this is worst case side. That the Democrats will weaken their party’s grip on the state even further in the process is the best case side. The cost will be documented by another socialist liberal study that won’t make the connection either, but will study the damage done by the very policies they once proposed.

    Will anyone notice the irony?

    ”’Don Newman is a free-lance writer in Honolulu. He can be reached via email at:”’ mailto:newmand001@hawaii.rr.com

    The Moral Case for Use of Force to Disarm Iraq

    The other day we watched as the Iraqi people pulled down a statue of Saddam Hussein in downtown Baghdad. We watched as they dragged the head of that statue through the streets of that city which has for so long been under the tyranny of this madman. We watched as children used their shoes to hit posters of the now deposed ruler of Iraq.

    We were able to watch these things because when it mattered Americans did not stand by and watch but got involved. We saw a compelling reason to take up arms in defense of world peace and security against an evil man with weapons of mass destruction.

    In recent weeks, and even now while we speak, we hear and read of people who say that the use of force is never justified, that war is never morally acceptable, and that our very presence there is evil.

    They protest. They march. But in the end they do nothing to oppose a man who has murdered his own citizens, a man who celebrated the 9/11 attack and who is amassing weapons of mass destruction to use against the “infidels of America.”

    It is clear that believers of all faith agree that war was never part of God’s plan. All was perfect in the beginning — whether by Christian, Jewish or Muslim theology. Before that, all was idyllic in the universe, at least until Lucifer sinned. Then there was war in heaven, and Lucifer was expelled

    Propaganda Machines in Hawaii Should Take a Lesson from Iraqi Minister of Information

    Did you see that Iraqi Minister of Information on TV? He was great, a classic.

    I wish that if people here in Hawaii were going to propagate misinformation to that same extent, that they’d at least do it with that flair and panache — rather than in all seriousness. Then at least we’d know when to laugh. Otherwise, like the Arabian audience who really took them seriously, they lose all faith and confidence in the reports and media.

    Today’s local media offerings indicate some union is readying itself for contract negotiations by planting the notion that in Hawaii, the poverty level is three times higher than what it is as a national standard.

    So while it would be at the poverty level for three to live on an income of $18,000 in the rest of the U.S., in Hawaii, a family of three needs $51,000 just to match that poverty level.

    The Honolulu Advertiser’s writer couldn’t tell the difference between the University of Washington and Washington University, where presumably he got that authoritative information.

    The KITV article omitted attributing that to any Mainland source but instead quoted some person affiliated with the University of Hawaii for his credibility.

    The pathetic thing is that neither source apparently have anybody on their staffs who can discern the preposterously bogus from real science — and that is the indictment of the education one expects to get in Hawaii. Why is that worth a premium?

    The ultimate objective of education is to produce citizens capable of learning and thinking for themselves — and not going through their whole lives relying on these “experts” to do their thinking for them.

    Such a system is referred to as a technocracy — in which those who have been given the benefit of the credit for being knowledgeable in a field, then claim that trust as their divine jurisdiction. And thus they claim in future discussions on these matters, that only these experts, know and have a right to direct the course of the agenda, which invariably comes to be, that they endlessly need to get more money because the problem they were charged with addressing in the first place, has now gotten totally out of control, requiring all our society’s resources.

    When this occurs, obviously we are investing in the problem rather than its solution and elimination. The object of health care is not to have better, more expensive health care and well-paid professionals in this field — but to have health to obviate the need for health care.

    But we also notice when these health-care workers go out on strike that they’re not exactly paragons of good health themselves but often as it turns out, are the prime candidates for their own services. Likewise in education, one would think that the good teacher is the one to which his students feel less reliance on his continued, perpetual guidance.

    Isn’t that the product we hope to produce through education? Or is it these people who are so easily manipulated and deceived because they cannot discern any differences that they will believe anything any propagandist and con artist wishes them to believe? And that’s why we need the people to reclaim education and health as their essential rights — rather than continue to be exploited for the benefit of a few self-designated people (oligarchs).

    So as we see the people being liberated in Iraq, here in Hawaii, we need to be mindful that we too are not really a democracy in this true sense but are controlled by the powerful vested self-interests, whose only skill and talent seems to be in learning how to play the game. And that is what we reward rather than the person of honor, integrity and good health. Thus we see in the reports this pervasive cynicism and corruption of those who have known and know nothing else. And that is all they ever communicate to us — their utter despair of ever having met somebody who ever told them the truth about anything. “What difference does it make?”

    The objective of any healthy society are people who can tell these differences and therefore make intelligent choices — for themselves, and not to produce as its ultimate product, people who cannot — and thinking that is a compassionate, intelligent, well-meaning society, liberal and tolerant society. Societies like that are the evil in the world.

    ”’Mike Hu is a resident of Honolulu and can be reached via email at:”’ mailto:humikhu@aol.com